Efficient Removal of Levofloxacin Hydrochloride from Environment by UiO-66/CoSO4 Composites
Received date: 2018-12-25
Online published: 2019-03-20
Supported by
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21507023, 21876045 and 21777038), Key Scientific Research Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Henan Province (No. 2016GGJS-047) and Scientific and Technological Department of Henan Province (No. 182102310656).
In this work, a newly UiO-66/CoSO4 composite was prepared by introducing UiO-66 as precursor carrier. The morphology and structure of the presented UiO-66/CoSO4 composite were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, elemental analysis, specific surface area analysis and X-ray diffraction. The adsorption performance of UiO-66/CoSO4 towards levofloxacin hydrochloride (LV) in aqueous solution was investigated, and some parameters, such as pH value, temperature, contact time and initial concentration have been optimized. The results showed that the UiO-66/CoSO4 composite has significant adsorption performance for levofloxacin hydrochloride. Compared with the control material UiO-66, the removal efficiency of the composite towards levofloxacin hydrochloride increased by 20% under the same conditions, which indicated that the properties of the composites have been greatly improved. Within 5 min, 95.3% of levofloxacin hydrochloride can be removed, and the equilibrium adsorption (99.8%) was achieved within 30 min and the adsorption process could be described by pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The adsorption isotherm verified that the maximum adsorption capacity was up to 108.42 mg·g-1 and fitted well with the Langmuir isotherm model, which indicated that monolayer coverage of levofloxacin hydrochloride was formed on the surface of UiO-66/CoSO4 composite. Data obtained from thermodynamic study showed that the adsorption process is spontaneous endothermic reaction and the chemical adsorption might play major role to control step. The UiO-66/CoSO4 composite was easy to prepare with good reusability, and the adsorption efficiency is still higher than 92.2% after five cycles. Additionally, under the optimized condition, the UiO-66/CoSO4 composite was successfully applied for the removal of levofloxacin hydrochloride from environmental water and soil samples. It was found that above 94.7% of target can be removed by the as-prepared UiO-66/CoSO4 composite. This result proved that the composite with excellent recognition has been synthesized. The new UiO-66/CoSO4 composite prepared in this work provided a way to treatment levofloxacin hydrochloride in environment with broad application prospect.
Key words： UiO-66/CoSO4; levofloxacin hydrochloride; environmental samples; removal
Zhu Guifen , Chen Letian , Cheng Guohao , Zhao Juan , Yang Can , Zhang Yaozong , Wang Xing , Fan Jing . Efficient Removal of Levofloxacin Hydrochloride from Environment by UiO-66/CoSO4 Composites[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2019 , 77(5) : 434 -441 . DOI: 10.6023/A18120511
[1] Yang, T.; Cui, Y. N.; Chen, H. Y.; Li, W. H. Acta Chim. Sinica 2017, 75, 339(in Chinese). (杨涛, 崔亚男, 陈怀银, 李伟华, 化学学报, 2017, 75, 339.)
[2] Cao, L. Y.; Wang, T. T.; Wang, C. Chin. J. Chem. 2018, 36, 754.
[3] Li, Y.; Zou, B.; Xiao, A. S.; Zhang, H. X. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 1501.
[4] Zhang, H.; Li, G. L.; Zhang, K. G.; Liao, C. Y. Acta Chim. Sinica 2017, 75, 841(in Chinese). (张贺, 李国良, 张可刚, 廖春阳, 化学学报, 2017, 75, 841.)
[5] Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zhao, G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 2322.
[6] Pang, C. M.; Luo, S. H.; Hao, Z. F.; Gao, J.; Huang, Z. H.; Yu, J. H.; Yu, S. M.; Wang, Z.Y. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 38, 2606(in Chinese). (庞楚明, 罗时荷, 郝志峰, 高健, 黄召昊, 余家海, 余思敏, 汪朝阳, 有机化学, 2018, 38, 2606.)
[7] Cao, J.; Yang, Z. H.; Xiong, W. P. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 353, 126.
[8] Jin, T.; Yuan, W.; Xue, Y. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 5238.
[9] Yan, B.; Niu, C. H.; Wang, J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 8048.
[10] Dong, S.; Sun, Y.; Wu, J. Chemosphere 2016, 150, 759.
[11] Yu, Y.; Wang, W.; Shi, J. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 10685.
[12] Yi, S.; Sun, Y.; Hu, X. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 25629.
[13] Li, H. R.; Song, L. N.; Hu, B. B.; Li, Z.; Li, S. M.; Wang, Z. Y. J. Shenyang Pharm. Univ. 2017, 34, 285(in Chinese). (李鹤然, 宋立娜, 胡贝贝, 李贞, 李三鸣, 王中彦, 沈阳药科大学学报, 2017, 34, 285.)
[14] Yi, S.; Gao, B.; Sun, Y. Chemosphere 2016, 150, 694.
[15] Shen, L. J.; Luo, M. B.; Liu, Y. H. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2015, 166, 445.
[16] Jin, J. H.; Yang, Z. H.; Xiong, W. P.; Zhou, Y. Y.; Xu, R.; Zhang, Y. R.; Cao, J.; Li, X. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 408.
[17] Zhu, G. F.; Fan, J.; Gao, Y. P. Talanta 2011, 84, 1124.
[18] Wu, C. L.; Zhu, G. F.; Fan, J. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 86428.
[19] Xiong, H.; Wu, X.; Lu, W. Talanta 2018, 176, 187.
[20] Zhu, G. F.; Gao, X.; Wang, X. L. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1532, 40.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
