Article

A Theoretical Study of 8-Azaguanine Radical Cation Deprotonation

  • Wang Yinghui ,
  • Wei Simin ,
  • Wang Kang ,
  • Xu Rongrong ,
  • Zhao Hongmei
Expand
  • a College of Science, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064;
    b Shaanxi Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicine Resources Industrialization, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang 712083;
    c Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Science(BNLMS), Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received date: 2019-12-18

  Online published: 2020-02-17

Supported by

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21705029) and the Shaanxi Provincial Association for Science and Technology Young Talents Lifting Plan (No. 20190307).

Abstract

Due to the lower redox potential comparing with guanine, it is the 8-azaguanine (8-AG) as the hole trap to form 8-azaguanine radical cation (8-AG·+) after one-electron oxidation of DNA containing 8-azaguanine. In generally, the 8-AG·+ may suffer from deprotonation to generate 8-AG(-H)·. In this text, we were stimulated to investigate the deprotonation reaction of 8-AG·+ generating by one-electron oxidation at M06-2X/6-31+G(d) level with explicit water molecules and polarized continuum model (PCM) to simulate the solvent effect. By building deprotonation model with different number of explicit water molecules, we found that these four water molecules locating around N(1)-H, O(6), N(2)-H of 8-AG·+ as well as the one locating in the second water shell which was hydrogen-bonding with the water around O(6) were necessary. If the water in the second water shell was not included, the imino proton (N(1)-H) would not transfer into the bulk water. In parallel, the N(1)-H would transfer to the O(6) of 8-AG·+ by intramolecular proton transfer. If the water molecule locating around N(2)-H was removed, the 8-AG·+ deprotonation would continue but the energy barrier would be lowered from 24.8 kJ/mol to 16.3 kJ/mol. In addition, the site of the water molecule in the second water shell was also studied. If putting the water in the second water shell around N(2)-H of 8-AG·+, the proton would be stabilized between the N(1) of 8-AG·+ and the oxygen of water molecule around N(1)-H meaning the proton would not be transferred into bulk water. Further, in order to test the influence of water number on 8-AG·+ deprotonation, the fifth water molecule, which is hydrogen-bonding with the water molecule around N(2)-H and another N(2)-H, was added. The potential energy surface with 5H2O revealed that it is almost no effect on the deprotonation pathway and energy barrier (25.5 kJ/mol). Lastly, so as to obtain the exact energy barrier of 8-AG·+ deprotonation, the deprotonation model with more explicit water molecules (9H2O) was proposed, where the additional water molecules were placed around N(2)-H, N(3), O(6), N(7) and N(8). From the potential energy surface, the deprotonation energy barrier of 8-AG·+ was confirmed to be 19.5 kJ/mol. These theoretical results provide valuable dynamics information and mechanistic insights for further understanding the properties of nucleic acid base analogues and one-electron oxidation of DNA.

Cite this article

Wang Yinghui , Wei Simin , Wang Kang , Xu Rongrong , Zhao Hongmei . A Theoretical Study of 8-Azaguanine Radical Cation Deprotonation[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2020 , 78(3) : 271 -278 . DOI: 10.6023/A19120435

References

[1] Seth, P. P.; Tanowitz, M.; Bennett, C. F. J. Clin. Invest. 2019, 129, 915.
[2] Zou, X.; Zhao, H.; Yu, Y.; Su, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 4509.
[3] Zou, X.; Dai, X.; Liu, K.; Zhao, H.; Song, D.; Su, H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 5864.
[4] Jie, J.; Xia, Y.; Huang, C.-H.; Zhao, H.; Yang, C.; Liu, K.; Song, D.; Zhu, B.-Z.; Su, H. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 11514.
[5] Kim, N.; Choi, J. W.; Song, A. Y.; Choi, W. S.; Park, H. R.; Park, S.; Kim, I.; Kim, H. S. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 67, 152.
[6] Kawada, M.; Amemiya, M.; Sakamoto, S.; Ohishi, T.; Yoshida, J.; Tatsuda, D. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 157.
[7] Folkes, L. K.; O'Neill, P. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2013, 58, 14.
[8] de Araujo, A. V. S.; Borin, A. C. J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 123, 3109.
[9] Zhou, Z. N.; Hu, Z. B.; Zhang, X. W.; Jia, M. H.; Wang, X. L.; Su, H. M.; Sun, H. T.; Chen, J. Q.; Xu, J. H. ChemPhysChem 2019, 20, 757.
[10] Wierzchowski, J.; Medza, G.; Szabelski, M.; Stachelska-Wierzchowska, A. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem. 2013, 265, 49.
[11] Kawai, K.; Majima, T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2616.
[12] Cadet, J.; Wagner, J. R.; Shafirovich, V.; Geacintov, N. E. Int. J. Radiat Biol. 2014, 90, 423.
[13] Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Yang, C.; Jie, J.; Dai, X.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, K.; Song, D.; Su, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1970.
[14] Takada, T.; Kawai, K.; Fujitsuka, M.; Majima, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101, 14002.
[15] Wu, L. D.; Jie, J. L.; Liu, K. H.; Su, H. M. Acta Chim. Sinica 2014, 72, 1182(in Chinese). (吴丽丹, 节家龙, 刘坤辉, 苏红梅, 化学学报, 2014, 72, 1182.)
[16] Yang, W. Y.; Lei, Z. C.; Hong, W. J.; Huang, F. Z. Acta Chim. Sinica 2019, 77, 951(in Chinese). (杨威宇, 雷志超, 洪文晶, 黄飞舟, 化学学报, 2019, 77, 951.)
[17] Kobayashi, K.; Tagawa, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10213.
[18] Wu, L. D.; Liu, K. H.; Jie, J. L.; Song, D.; Su, H. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 259.
[19] Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Zhou, Q.; Dai, X.; Liu, K.; Song, D.; Su, H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 2853.
[20] Rokhlenko, Y.; Cadet, J.; Geacintov, N. E.; Shafirovich, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5956.
[21] Rokhlenko, Y.; Geacintov, N. E.; Shafirovich, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4955.
[22] Zhang, Q. H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Yang, Z. Z. Acta Chim. Sinica 2014, 72, 956(in Chinese). (张千慧, 王阳, 刘翠, 杨忠志, 化学学报, 2014, 72, 956.)
[23] Lonkar, P.; Dedon, P. C. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 128, 1999.
[24] Wu, Y. J.; Zhai, S. G.; Lu, K.; Gao, L. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2014, 18, 1593.
[25] Li, X.; Cai, Z.; Sevilla, M. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 10115.
[26] Kumar, A.; Sevilla, M. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 11359.
[27] Wang, Y. H.; Jie, J. L.; Zhao, H. M.; Bai, Y.; Qin, P. X.; Song, D. Acta Chim. Sinica 2018, 76, 475(in Chinese). (王英辉, 节家龙, 赵红梅, 白羽, 秦佩萱, 宋迪, 化学学报, 2018, 76, 475.)
[28] Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215.
[29] Wei, S. M.; Wang, Y. H.; Zhao, H. M. Acta Chim. Sinica 2019, 77, 278(in Chinese). (魏思敏, 王英辉, 赵红梅, 化学学报, 2019, 77, 278.)
[30] Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 1095.
[31] Galano, A.; Alvarez-Idaboy, J. R. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 12476.
[32] Candeias, L. P.; Steenken, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1094.
[33] Berkelbach, T. C.; Lee, H. S.; Tuckerman, M. E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 238302
[34] Marx, D.; Tuckerman, M. E.; Hutter, J.; Parrinello, M. Nature 1999, 397, 601.
[35] Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Ha-segawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 09, Revision A. 01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2009.
Outlines

/