Article

Optimization Mechanism for Operational Conditions of Biomass Liquid-Catalyst Fuel Cell

  • Shan Jiang ,
  • Huan Li
Expand
  • 1 Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China

Received date: 2020-09-28

  Online published: 2020-12-01

Supported by

Special Program for Sustainable Development at Shenzhen(KCXFZ20200201100844824)

Abstract

Liquid-catalyst fuel cell (LCFC) is a novel device that can convert biomass to electricity directly under mild conditions, but its optimal operational parameters and corresponding mechanism have not been disclosed. In this study, the effect of anolyte pH and temperature on LCFC performance was analyzed comprehensively. Polarization curves and power density curves were measured using the linear sweep voltammetry to evaluate the power generation from LCFC. The Mo5+ concentration and total organic carbon in anolyte were measured to deduce the redox reaction between organics and heteropoly acid, and the Mo5+ concentration-absorbance standard curve was established using the potassium permanganate titration method and the ultraviolet visible spectrophotometry. The valence composition of Mo in anolyte was characterized using XPS spectra. The results demonstrated that a proper anolyte acidification significantly promoted the redox reaction between organic substrates and heteropoly acid, but an excessive acidification destroyed the structure of heteropoly acid and accordingly reduced its oxidizability. When the pH of anolyte was less than 1.5, the pH affected the power output of LCFC significantly. A moderate decrease of anolyte pH improved the power density greatly. At pH 0.86, the power density reached the maximum 14.85 mW•cm–2, which was 1.24 times higher than that without anolyte acidification. At extremely low pH, the power density deteriorated due to the decomposition of heteropoly acid and its weakened oxidizability. At the pH range of 1.5 to 7.5, the effect of pH on LCFC performance was relatively small. Moderate operational temperatures could enhance the performance of LCFC, but excessively high temperatures would dehydrate proton exchange membranes and consequently hindered proton transfer. Therefore, the temperature 80 ℃ was recommended for LCFC operation.

Cite this article

Shan Jiang , Huan Li . Optimization Mechanism for Operational Conditions of Biomass Liquid-Catalyst Fuel Cell[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2021 , 79(2) : 208 -215 . DOI: 10.6023/A20090453

References

[1]
Xu F.; Liu Y.; Jing Q.; Li H. Chin. J. Power Sources 2018, 42, 1682. (in Chinese)
[1]
徐帆, 刘跃玲, 景琦, 李欢, 电源技术, 2018, 42, 1682.
[2]
Wu W.; Liu W.; Mu W.; Deng Y. J. Power Sources 2016, 318, 86.
[3]
Chen J.Y. Ph.D. Dissertation, Tianjing University, Tianjing, 2016 (in Chinese).
[3]
陈嘉懿, 博士论文, 天津大学, 天津, 2016.
[4]
Liu W.; Mu W.; Liu M.; Zhang X.; Cai H.; Deng Y. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 1.
[5]
Liu W.; Mu W.; Deng Y. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 13558.
[6]
Zhang Z.; Liu C.; Liu W.; Du X.; Cui Y.; Gong J.; Guo H.; Deng Y. Energy 2017, 141, 1019.
[7]
Gong J.; Liu W.; Du X.; Liu C.; Zhang Z.; Sun F.; Yang L.; Xu G.; Guo H.; Deng Y. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 506.
[8]
Xu F.; Li H.; Liu Y.; Jing Q. Sci Rep. 2017, 7, 1.
[9]
Liu Y.; Jing Q.; Li H. Guangdong Chem. Ind. 2018, 45, 116. (in Chinese)
[9]
刘跃岭, 景琦, 李欢, 广东化工, 2018, 45, 116.
[10]
Liu Y.; Jing Q.; Xu F.; Li H. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2018, 12, 2935. (in Chinese)
[10]
刘跃岭, 景琦, 徐帆, 李欢, 环境工程学报, 2018, 12, 2935.
[11]
Xu F.; Liu Y.; Jing Q.; Li H. Guangdong Chem. Ind. 2017, 44, 39. (in Chinese)
[11]
徐帆, 刘跃岭, 景琦, 李欢, 广东化工, 2017, 44, 39.
[12]
Odyakov V.F.; Zhizhina E.G.; Maksimovskaya R.I. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2008, 342, 126.
[13]
Zhan Y.; Zhao Q.; Li L.; Liu Y.; Gong Y.; He M. Eng. Plast. Appl. 2019, 47, 135. (in Chinese)
[13]
战奕凯, 赵潜, 李莉萍, 刘玉飞, 龚勇吉, 何敏, 工程塑料应用, 2019, 47, 135.
[14]
Li J. M.S. Thesis, Shandong University, Jinan, 2018 (in Chinese).
[14]
李俊鹏, 硕士论文, 山东大学, 济南, 2018.
[15]
Wu Q.; Wang E. Chemistry 1988, 07), 52. (in Chinese)
[15]
吴庆银, 王恩波, 化学通报, 1988, ( 07), 52.
[16]
Pan J.; Chen Y.; Yan H. Chromogenic Reagents and Their Application in Spectrophotometry, Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, Shanghai, 1981, p. 65 (in Chinese).
[16]
潘教麦, 陈亚森, 严恒太 , 显色剂及其在光度分析中的应用, 上海科学技术出版社, 上海, 1981, p. 65.
[17]
Wu Q.; Wang S.; Jiang Z. Metall. Anal. 2000, ( 01), 6. (in Chinese)
[17]
吴群娣, 王盛棉, 蒋治良, 冶金分析, 2000, ( 01), 6.
[18]
Mcgarvey G.B.; Moffat J.B. J. Mol. Catal. 1991, 69, 137.
[19]
Yu Y.; Lou X.; Wu H. Energy Fuels 2008, 22, 46.
[20]
Kim K.; Song D.; Han J.I. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 241, 60.
[21]
Xu J.; Sheng G.P.; Luo H.W.; Luo H.W.; Li W.W.; Wang L.F.; Yu H.Q. Water Res. 2012, 46, 1817.
[22]
Rozendal R.; Hamelers H.; Buisman C. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 5206.
[23]
Li D. Principles of Electrochemistry, 3rd ed., Beihang University Press, Beijing, 2008, p. 142 (in Chinese)
[23]
李荻 , 电化学原理, 第3版, 北京航空航天大学出版社, 北京, 2008, p. 142.
[24]
Zhao X.; Zhu J.Y. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 197.
[25]
Lee C.H.; Park H.B.; Lee Y.M.; Lee R.D. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 7617.
Outlines

/