Prediction on the Resistance of Acetohydroxyacid Synthase Mutants to Herbicide Flumetsulam
Received date: 2021-11-20
Online published: 2021-12-27
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(21837001); National Natural Science Foundation of China(21740002)
Flumetsulam is a widely used herbicide that targets the acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS). Mutations in AHAS have caused serious herbicide resistance which threatened the field application of this herbicide. We have recently established a mutation-dependent biomacromolecular quantitative structure-activity relationship method, called MB-QSAR, which could be used to quantitatively predict the mutational drug resistance in molecular level and elucidating the three dimensional structure-resistance relationships for the design of resistance evading inhibitors. In this work, we employ MB-QSAR method to predict the molecular drug resistance of AHAS mutants towards flumetsulam, and to depict the structure resistance relationships in AHAS mutants. A series of AHAS mutants concerned with the herbicide resistance were constructed, and the inhibitory properties of flumetsulam against these mutants were measured. Then the structures of these mutants were constructed, optimized and aligned for the subsequent MB-QSAR modelling. The CoMFA (comparative molecular field analysis) and CoMSIA (comparative molecular similarity indices analysis) molecular field values (steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic, hydrogen-bond donor and hydrogen-bond acceptor descriptors) were calculated in the flumetsulam binding pocket for these mutants. The CoMFA and CoMSIA molecular field values were used as independent variables, while the pKi values for each mutants were used as dependent variables in the partial least squares (PLS) regression analyses to derive the MB-QSAR models. The built MB-QSAR model showed excellent correlation between experimental and computational data (MB-QSAR/CoMFA model: q2=0.691, r2=0.947, r2pred=0.759; MB-QSAR/CoMSIA model: q2=0.625, r2=0.960, r2pred=0.619), indicating the good prediction for the inhibition properties of flumetsulam against AHAS mutants. The comparison of the molecular interaction diagrams from MB-QSAR models provides information about which positions in the polypeptide chain could have a higher propensity to acquire herbicide resistant mutations, which in turn provides guidelines for modifying the existing herbicide as well as for designing new resistance-evading herbicides. The obtained MB-QSAR model also showed reasonable predictive power toward AHAS from various species, indicating the potential application of our MB-QSAR method in the prediction of the selectivity of drugs towards targets from different species.
Baifan Wang , Yinwu He , Xin Wen , Congwei Niu , Zhen Xi . Prediction on the Resistance of Acetohydroxyacid Synthase Mutants to Herbicide Flumetsulam[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2022 , 80(2) : 141 -149 . DOI: 10.6023/A21110526
| [1] | Hao, G. F.; Yang, G. F.; Zhan, C. G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 9663. |
| [2] | Chen, Y. Z.; Gu, X. L.; Cao, Z. W. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2001, 19, 560. |
| [3] | Cao, Z. W.; Han, L. Y.; Zheng, C. J.; Ji, Z. L.; Chen, X.; Lin, H. H.; Chen, Y. Z. Drug Discov. Today 2005, 10, 521. |
| [4] | Hauser, K.; Negron, C.; Albanese, S. K.; Ray, S.; Steinbrecher, T.; Abel, R.; Chodera, J. D.; Wang, L. Commun. Biol. 2018, 1, 70. |
| [5] | Goodford, P. J. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 849. |
| [6] | Kastenholz, M. A.; Pastor, M.; Cruciani, G.; Haaksma, E. E.; Fox, T. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3033. |
| [7] | Wang, T.; Wade, R. C. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 961. |
| [8] | Murcia, M.; Morreale, A.; Ortiz, A. R. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6241. |
| [9] | Deng, Z.; Chuaqui, C.; Singh, J. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 337. |
| [10] | Cramer, R. D.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959. |
| [11] | He, Y. W.; Niu, C. W.; Wen, X.; Xi, Z. Mol. Inform. 2013, 32, 139. |
| [12] | He, Y. W.; Niu, C. W.; Wen, X.; Xi, Z. Chin. J. Chem. 2013, 31, 1171. |
| [13] | He, Y. W.; Niu, C. W.; Li, H.; Wen, X.; Xi, Z. Sci. China Chem. 2013, 56, 286. |
| [14] | Subramanian, M. V.; Gerwick, B. C. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1989, 277. |
| [15] | Hawkes, T. Monograph-British Crop Protection Council 1989, 42, 131. |
| [16] | Shaner, D.; Anderson, P. C.; Stidham, M. A. Plant. Physiol. 1984, 76, 545. |
| [17] | Ray, T. B. Plant. Physiol. 1984, 75, 823. |
| [18] | McCourt, J. A.; Duggleby, R. G. Amino Acids 2006, 31, 173. |
| [19] | Rost, T. L. J. Plant. Growth. Regul. 1984, 3, 51. |
| [20] | Tranel, P. J.; Wright, T. R. Weed Sci. 2002, 50, 700. |
| [21] | Bernasconi, P.; Woodworth, A. R.; Rosen, B. A.; Subramanian, M. V.; Siehl, D. L. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 17381. |
| [22] | Mourad, G.; Williams, D.; King, J. Planta 1995, 196, 64. |
| [23] | Sibony, M.; Michel, A.; Haas, H.; Rubin, B.; Hurle, K. Weed Res. 2001, 41, 509. |
| [24] | Hattori, J.; Brown, D.; Mourad, G.; Labbé, H.; Ouellet, T.; Sunohara, G.; Rutledge, R.; King, J.; Miki, B. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1995, 246, 419. |
| [25] | Mourad, G.; King, J. Planta 1992, 188, 491. |
| [26] | Niu, C. W. Ph.D. Dissertation, Nankai University, Tianjin, 2005. (in Chinese) |
| [26] | ( 牛聪伟, 博士论文, 南开大学, 天津, 2005.) |
| [27] | Xi, Z.; Niu, C. W.; Li, Q. X.; Ouyang, D.; Ban, S. R. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2005, 7, 215. (in Chinese) |
| [27] | ( 席真, 牛聪伟, 李庆霞, 欧阳砥, 班树荣, 农药学学报, 2005, 7, 215.) |
| [28] | McCourt, J. A.; Pang, S. S.; King-Scott, J.; Guddat, L. W.; Duggleby, R. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103, 569. |
| [29] | Xi, Z.; Niu, C. W.; Ban, S. R.; Li, Q. X.; Ouyang, D.; Huang, M. Z. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2005, 7, 311. (in Chinese) |
| [29] | ( 席真, 牛聪伟, 班树荣, 李庆霞, 欧阳砥, 黄明智, 农药学学报, 2005, 7, 311.) |
| [30] | He, Y. W. Ph.D. Dissertation, Nankai University, Tianjin, 2013. (in Chinese) |
| [30] | ( 何寅武, 博士论文, 南开大学, 天津, 2013.) |
| [31] | Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
