基于强化界面润湿调控的多羟基苯磺酸盐驱油剂的合成与性能评价

doi:10.6023/A21080413

摘要/Abstract

通过调控原油-岩石界面润湿性进而提高采收率是油田高效开发的重要思路. 现有阴离子表面活性剂改变岩石表面润湿性能力有限, 研发强化界面润湿调控性能的新型驱油剂具有重要应用意义. 本工作合成了一种新型表面活性剂二羟甲基十二烷基苯磺酸钠(SDDBS), 通过红外和核磁进行结构表征. 探究了SDDBS在亲油岩石表面的吸附行为、降低油水界面张力能力、对岩石表面润湿性调控能力、油膜剥离能力以及驱油性能. 实验结果表明SDDBS可在亲油岩石表面均匀吸附, 临界胶束浓度下可将油水界面张力降至2.54 mN/m, 亲油玻璃片经0.02% (w) SDDBS溶液处理48 h后, 其空气中水滴接触角由100.2°降低至24.5°, 水下油滴接触角由19.2°增加至153.9°, 证明SDDBS可将亲油/疏水的岩石表面调控为强亲水/水下强疏油状态. 采用0.02% (w) SDDBS溶液在60 ℃下处理原油老化的玻璃片, 24 h内油膜剥离面积高达89%, 在地层水条件下油膜剥离面积仍可达81%. 室内模拟岩心驱油实验结果显示采收率提高10.53%. 本工作通过一步法合成一种新型多羟基苯磺酸盐驱油剂, 通过引入氢键强化其界面润湿调控能力用于油膜高效剥离, 具有较强实际应用潜力.

关键词: 表面活性剂, 驱油剂, 界面润湿性, 油膜剥离

Controlling the wettability of the oil-rock interface is an important way for highly efficient oilfield development. For existing anionic surfactants, their capability of changing the wettability of the rock surface is limited. Therefore, developing novel oil displacement agent with enhanced interfacial wettability control capability is of great significance. In this work, an interfacial wettability controlling oil displacement agent, sodium dimethyloldodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDDBS), was synthesized and the structure was characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and ¹H-nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H NMR). The critical micelle concentration (cmc) of SDDBS was measured by spinning drop method and was determined as 0.02% (w). The adsorption behavior of SDDBS on oil-wet rock surface, the interfacial tension reduction property, wettability controlling property, oil film peeling performance and the oil displacement performance were evaluated. Based on the atomic force microscopy (AFM) images, SDDBS could adsorb uniformly on the surface of oil-wet rocks. The oil/water interfacial tension could be reduced to 2.54 mN/m under cmc. After immersing the oil-wet glass sheet in 0.02% (w) SDDBS solution for 48 h, the contact angle of the glass sheet towards water drop in air reduced from 100.2° to 24.5°, while the contact angle towards oil drop underwater increased from 19.2° to 153.9°, proving that SDDBS could regulate the wettability of the oil-wet/hydrophobic rock surface to strong hydrophilic/underwater oleophobic state. The oil film peeling performance of SDDBS was evaluated by calculating the remaining oil film area by graphical analysis software. When soaked in 0.02% (w) SDDBS solution at 60 ℃, the area of oil film could be reduced by 89% within 24 h. The oil film reduction rate could still reach 81% in simulated formation water, indicating good reservoir adaptability. Laboratory simulation core displacement experiments were conducted at 60 ℃ and the results showed that the oil recovery rate was increased by 10.53%. In this work, a novel polyhydroxy benzene sulfonate surfactant was synthesized by one-step method. By introducing hydrogen bond to enhance the interfacial wetting control ability of surfactant, the oil film could be peeled off efficiently, exhibiting strong practical application potential.

Key words: surfactant, oil displacement agent, interfacial wettability, oil film peeling off

引用此文

李琳, 王子昭, 刘佳伟, 陈佳, 金晓, 戴彩丽. 基于强化界面润湿调控的多羟基苯磺酸盐驱油剂的合成与性能评价[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(1): 63-68.

Lin Li, Zizhao Wang, Jiawei Liu, Jia Chen, Xiao Jin, Caili Dai. Synthesis and Performance Evaluation of Polyhydroxy Benzene Sulfonate Oil Displacement Agent Based on Enhanced Interfacial Wettability Control[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2022, 80(1): 63-68.

导出引用 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

分享此文

图/表 10

图1. SDDBS合成示意图

Figure 1. Synthesis schematic diagram of SDDBS

图2. (a) SDDBS红外光谱图和(b)核磁共振氢谱

Figure 2. (a) FT-IR and (b) 1H NMR of SDDBS

图3. 室温下SDDBS的表面张力随质量浓度变化曲线

Figure 3. Change of surface tension with mass concentration of SDDBS at room temperature

图4. (a)亲油处理云母片在0.02% (w) SDDBS溶液中吸附后AFM表面形貌3D图; (b) AFM表面形貌2D图; (c)吸附高度剖面图

Figure 4. (a) 3D figure of AFM surface morphology of oil-wet mica after adsorption in 0.02% (w) SDDBS solution; (b) 2D figure of AFM surface morphology; (c) adsorption thickness diagram of selected path

图5. SDBS与SDDBS正己烷-水界面张力随质量浓度变化曲线

Figure 5. Change of n-hexane/water interfacial tension with mass concentration of SDBS and SDDBS at 60 ℃

图6. 亲油玻璃片在去离子水配置SDBS、SDDBS及地层水配置SDDBS溶液中浸泡48 h后空气中水滴接触角(a)和水下油滴接触角(b)

Figure 6. Contact angles of water droplets in air (a) and oil droplets underwater (b) after the oil-wet glass sheets were soaked in SDBS, SDDBS solution with deionized water and SDDBS solution with formation water for 48 h

图7. (a) SDDBS和SDBS处理油膜效果; (b) 不同条件下油膜相对面积随时间变化曲线

Figure 7. (a) Oil film stripping state in SDDBS and SDBS; (b) curves of relative area of oil film over time under different conditions

图8. SDDBS剥离油膜的动态过程示意图

Figure 8. Schematic diagram of oil film stripping by SDDBS

长度/ cm	直径/ cm	渗透率/ (10^-3 µm²)	孔隙体积/ cm³		孔隙度/%	含油饱和度/%
7.482	2.526	57.0		6.05	16.21	76.00

表1. 实验所用岩心参数

Table 1. Core parameters used in the experiment

图9. SDDBS驱替实验结果

Figure 9. SDDBS displacement performance test results

参考文献 39

[1]	Zhao, F.-L. The Principle of EOR, Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 2001, Chapter 6 ; (in Chinese)
	( 赵福麟, EOR原理, 石油工业出版社, 北京. 2001, 第6章.)
[2]	Sun, L.; Tian, Y.-Y. Oilfield Chem. 2013, 30, 216 ; (in Chinese)
	( 孙琳, 田园媛, 油田化学 2013, 30, 216.)
[3]	Guo, H.-J. Pet. Geol. Eng. 2012, 26, 105 ; (in Chinese)
	( 郭洪军, 石油地质与工程, 2012, 26, 105.)
[4]	Li, L; Chen, J.; Jin, X.; Wang, Z.-Z.; Wu, Y.-N.; Dai, C.-L. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 116973.
[5]	Shen, P.-P. Reservoir Physics Experiment Technology, Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 1995, Chapter 2-5 ; (in Chinese)
	( 沈平平, 油层物理实验技术, 石油工业出版社, 北京, 1995, 第2-5章.)
[6]	Xu, B. M.S. Thesis, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, 2019 ; (in Chinese)
	( 徐冰, 硕士论文, 东北石油大学, 大庆, 2019.)
[7]	Jian, G.; Puerto, M.; Wehowsky, A. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 513, 684. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.041
[8]	Ash, P. A.; Bain, C. D. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 17, 4.
[9]	Yao, Y.; Wei, M. Z. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 294, 102477. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102477
[10]	Hu, X.-Q. M.S. Thesis, Northwestern University, Xi'an, 2014 ; (in Chinese)
	( 胡秀强, 硕士论文, 西北大学, 西安, 2014.)
[11]	Dabiri, A.; Honarvar, B. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2020, 23, 4.
[12]	Zhang, X. Q. M.S. Thesis, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 2013 ; (in Chinese)
	( 张小琴, 硕士论文, 中国海洋大学, 青岛, 2013.)
[13]	Wu, X.-J.; Zhao, L.; Wang, X.-J. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 2013, 34, 110.
[14]	Massarweh, O.; Abushaikha, A. S. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 3150.
[15]	Fuangswasdi, A.; Charoensaeng, A.; Sabatini, D. A. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2006, 9, 21. doi: 10.1007/s11743-006-0370-2
[16]	Sun, L. H.; Liu, W. D.; Sun, C. L. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 233, 2051.
[17]	Ebrahim, A. S.; Garrouch, A. A.; Lababidi, H. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2016, 138, 234. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.11.011
[18]	Paria, S.; Khilar, K. C. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 110, 75. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2004.03.001
[19]	Salager, J. L.; Forgiarini, A. M. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2017, 16, 449. doi: 10.1007/s11743-013-1470-4
[20]	Yamaguchi, M.; Tamura, S.; Sakata, T. Sens. Mater. 2018, 30, 1307.
[21]	Jian, G.; Puerto, M.; Wehowsky, A. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 513, 684. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.041
[22]	Zana, R. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 248, 203. doi: 10.1006/jcis.2001.8104
[23]	Atta, D. Y.; Negash, B. M.; Yekeen, N.; Habte, A. D. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 321.
[24]	Zhao, T.-T.; Gong, H.-J.; Xu, G.-Y.; Cao, X.-L.; Song, X.-W.; Wang, H.-Y. Oilfield Chem. 2010, 27, 112 ; (in Chinese)
	( 赵涛涛, 宫厚健, 徐桂英, 曹绪龙, 宋新旺, 王红艳, 油田化学 2010, 27, 112.)
[25]	Chen, B.-L.; Li, L.; Zhu, L.-Z. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Sci. Ed.) 2007, 34, 241 ; (in Chinese)
	( 陈宝梁, 李菱, 朱利中, 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2007, 34, 241.)
[26]	Fu, M.-L.; Zhou, Y.-X. J. Oil Gas Technol. 2012, 34, 128 ; (in Chinese)
	( 付美龙, 周玉霞, 石油天然气学报, 2012, 34, 128.)
[27]	Li, L.; Chen, J.; Xu, X.-P.; Liu, J.-W.; Xu, Z.-Z.; Sun, W.; Zhu, Z.-X.; Dai, C.-L. Oilfield Chem. 2021, 38, 90 ; (in Chinese)
	( 李琳, 陈佳, 徐效平, 刘佳伟, 徐忠正, 孙雯, 朱芷萱, 戴彩丽, 油田化学 2021, 38, 90.)
[28]	Wang, X.-Z.; Kang, W.-L.; Meng, X.-C.; Fan, H.-M.; Xu, H.; Huang, J.-W.; Fu, J.-B.; Zhang, Y.-N. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2012, 28, 2285 ; (in Chinese) doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201206291
	( 王宪中, 康万利, 孟祥灿, 范海明, 徐海, 黄经纬, 傅建斌, 张一诺, 物理化学学报, 2012, 28, 2285.)
[29]	Lu, X.-G.; Wang, X.-Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, R.-J. Acta Chim. Sinica 2010, 68, 1229 ; (in Chinese)
	( 卢祥国, 王晓燕, 李强, 王荣健, 化学学报 2010, 68, 1229.)
[30]	Cao, X.-L.; Lv, K.; Cui, X.-H.; Shi, J.; Yuan, S.-L. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2010, 26, 1959 ; (in Chinese) doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20100706
	( 曹绪龙, 吕凯, 崔晓红, 石静, 苑世领, 物理化学学报, 2010, 26, 1959.)
[31]	Zhang, P.-L. M.S. Thesis, Shandong University, Jinan, 2014 ; (in Chinese)
	( 张培利, 硕士论文, 山东大学, 济南, 2014.)
[32]	Ren, X.-J.; Liu, N.; Qu, Z.-H.; Zhang, N.-S. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2005, 32, 123 ; (in Chinese)
	( 任晓娟, 刘宁, 曲志浩, 张宁生, 石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32, 123.)
[33]	Jiang, P.; Zhang, G.-C.; Ge, J.-J.; Wang, D.-F.; Ma, T. Acta Pet. Sin., Pet. Process. Sect. 2008, 24, 222 ; (in Chinese)
	( 蒋平, 张贵才, 葛际江, 王东方, 马涛, 石油学报(石油加工), 2008, 24, 222.)
[34]	Li, J.-G. M.S. Thesis, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, 2006 ; (in Chinese)
	( 李俊刚, 硕士论文, 东北石油大学, 大庆, 2006.)
[35]	Jiang, P.; Zhang, G.-C. J. Petrochem. Univ. 2009, 22, 61 ; (in Chinese)
	( 蒋平, 张贵才, 石油化工高等学校学报, 2009, 22, 61.)
[36]	Lundborg, M.; Lindahl, E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 119, 810. doi: 10.1021/jp505332p
[37]	Li, Z.-Q.; Guo, X.-L.; Wang, H.-Y.; Li, Q.-H.; Yuan, S.-L.; Xu, G.-Y.; Liu, C.-P. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2009, 25, 16 ; (in Chinese)
	( 李振泉, 郭新利, 王红艳, 李青华, 苑世领, 徐桂英, 刘成卜, 物理化学学报, 2009, 25, 16.)
[38]	Wang, Y.-F.; Yu, W.-Z.; Hu, S.-Q. J. Univ. Pet., China, Ed. Nat. Sci. 2011, 35, 153 ; (in Chinese)
	( 王业飞, 于维钊, 胡松青, 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35, 153.)
[39]	Alqam, M.; Abu-Khamsin, S. A.; Sultan, A. S.; Okasha, T.; Yildiz, H. O. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 3.