媒介体催化在锂-空气电池中的应用与挑战★

doi:10.6023/A25050180

化学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 83 ›› Issue (11): 1414-1423.DOI: 10.6023/A25050180 上一篇下一篇

综述

媒介体催化在锂-空气电池中的应用与挑战^★

何璐, 王硕, 陈宇辉^*()

南京工业大学化工学院材料化学工程全国重点实验室南京 211816

投稿日期:2025-05-19 发布日期:2025-07-21
通讯作者: 陈宇辉

作者简介:

陈宇辉, 2009年本科毕业于复旦大学化学系, 2014年博士毕业于英国圣安德鲁斯大学, 随后在牛津大学从事博士后工作, 2017年入职南京工业大学任教授, 研究集中于原位电化学光谱/质谱表征和锂氧电池反应机制. 在原位电化学差分质谱和锂氧电池中媒介体催化电极反应等方面积累了丰富经验, 并取得多项研究成果, 在Nat. Catal.、Nat. Energy、Nat. Mater.、Nat. Chem.及Nat. Commum.等期刊发表论文50余篇. 现兼任Energy Mater.编委、SusMat和Chin. Chem. Lett.青年编委.

^★“中国青年化学家”专辑.

基金资助:
项目受国家自然科学基金(52173173); 江苏省自然科学基金(BK20220051)

Applications and Challenges of Redox-Mediated Catalysis in Lithium-Air Batteries^★

He Lu, Wang Shuo, Chen Yuhui^*()

State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816

Received:2025-05-19 Published:2025-07-21
Contact: Chen Yuhui
About author:
^★For the VSI “Rising Stars in Chemistry”.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52173173); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK20220051)

文章分享

摘要/Abstract

锂-空气电池是发展先进储能系统中的重要电池体系, 具有极高比能量. 然而, 锂-空气电池在正极侧仍面临着电极动力学缓慢、过电位高和电解液分解副反应等问题. 为克服上述问题, 研究者引入多种催化策略, 其中氧化还原媒介体分子催化剂的出现解决了“固-固”界面接触问题, 可有效地提高锂-空气电池的电化学性能. 聚焦于锂-空气电池的研究现状和关键挑战, 系统阐述了该体系中媒介体催化的作用机制及其应用, 进一步探讨了理想媒介体的设计要点与技术难点, 最后对该领域提出了展望.

关键词: 锂-空气电池, 氧化还原媒介体, 分子催化剂, 固-液-固界面, 电极反应动力学

Lithium-air batteries are considered promising candidates for the development of advanced energy storage systems due to their exceptionally high theoretical energy densities. Taking lithium-oxygen batteries as an example, their theoretical specific energy can reach up to 3500 Wh/kg. However, lithium-air batteries, including lithium-oxygen and lithium-carbon dioxide batteries, still face significant challenges on the cathode side, such as sluggish reaction kinetics, high overpotentials, and side reactions caused by electrolyte decomposition. During discharge, gaseous reactants such as O₂ or CO₂ are reduced at the cathode to form solid discharge products like peroxides, carbonates, or oxalates. These products typically possess poor electronic and ionic conductivity, which can passivate the electrode surface, leading to catalyst deactivation and capacity limitations. In the subsequent charging process, the poor “solid-solid” contact between the catalyst and these insulating discharge products makes them difficult to decompose efficiently, resulting in high overpotentials, low coulombic efficiency, and severe parasitic reactions. To address these issues, researchers have introduced redox mediator (RM) molecular catalysts to convert the “solid-solid” interface into a more efficient “solid-liquid-solid” interface. RMs transfer electrons between the electrode and the discharge products in solution phase, enabling their oxidation and fully decomposition, thereby improving the poor contact of “solid-solid” interface and significantly improving the electrochemical performance of lithium-air batteries. This review briefly introduces the current status and key challenges in lithium-air battery research and, using lithium-oxygen batteries as a representative system, systematically discusses the catalytic roles, mechanisms, and advantages and disadvantages of redox mediators during both discharge and charge processes. Furthermore, the design principles and technical barriers in developing ideal redox mediator catalysts are analyzed, and future perspectives for this research field are proposed.

Key words: lithium-air battery, redox mediator, molecular catalyst, solid-liquid-solid interface, electrode reaction kinetics

引用此文

何璐, 王硕, 陈宇辉. 媒介体催化在锂-空气电池中的应用与挑战^★[J]. 化学学报, 2025, 83(11): 1414-1423.

He Lu, Wang Shuo, Chen Yuhui. Applications and Challenges of Redox-Mediated Catalysis in Lithium-Air Batteries^★[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2025, 83(11): 1414-1423.

导出引用 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

分享此文

图/表 5

图1. (a)锂氧电池中O2还原示意图[溶液路径(蓝)和表面路径(灰)[54]]以及(b) DBBQ[34]、(c) AQ[55]和(d) RB[57]催化放电过程示意图

Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of O2 reduction in a Li-O2 cell [the solution pathway (blue) and the surface pathway (gray)[54]], and schematics of discharge process catalyzed by (b) DBBQ[34], (c) AQ[55] and (d) RB[57]

图2. (a) RM催化Li2O2分解示意图(电子转移步骤使用蓝色虚线框标出)、(b) SECM反馈曲线示意图[62]、(c)表观速率常数kapp与媒介体氧化还原电位E0的关系[62]及(d)含有LiTFSI的DMSO电解液中不同形式电位E ($\mathrm{I}_{3}^{-}$/I－)下$\mathrm{I}_{3}^{-}$氧化Li2O2的反应速率常数[63]

Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of Li2O2 decomposition catalyzed by the RM (the electron transfer steps highlighted by blue dashed boxes), (b) schematics of SECM feedback approach curves[62], (c) dependence of the apparent rate constant, kapp, on the redox potential, E0, of the mediators[62], (d) the kapp of $\mathrm{I}_{3}^{-}$ oxidizing Li2O2 with various E ($\mathrm{I}_{3}^{-}$/I－) in DMSO electrolyte containing LiTFSI[63]

图3. FePc作为RM在锂氧电池中的(a)作用和(b)催化反应路径[66]及(c)不同过渡金属酞菁作为RM在锂氧电池中的恒电流循环[68]

Figure 3. (a) The role and (b) the possible catalyzed reaction routes of FePc as an RM in Li-O2 batteries[66], and (c) galvanostatic cycling performance of different transition-metal phthalocyanines as RMs in Li-O₂ batteries[68]

图4. (a) TEMPO催化锂氧电池充电过程的示意图和电化学性能[73]及(b)多孔碳电极在含TTF的Li-DMSO电解质中循环时观察到不同状态下(用字母B到F标记)的紫外可见光谱[78]

Figure 4. (a) Schematics and electrochemical performance of charging process catalyzed by TEMPO in Li-O2 batteries[73], and (b) UV-vis spectra observed at different states (marked by letters from B to F) during cycling of the porous carbon electrode in the TTF-containing Li-DMSO electrolyte[78]

图5. TEMPO和PTMA的作用过程[80]

Figure 5. Working processes of TEMPO and PTMA[80]

参考文献 97

[1]	Chen Y.; Xu J.; He P.; Qiao Y.; Guo S.; Yang H.; Zhou H. Sci. Bull. 2022, 67, 2449.
[2]	Wang H.-F.; Xu Q. Matte. 2019, 1, 565.
[3]	Li Y.; Lu J. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1370.
[4]	Sun Q.; Dai L.; Luo T.; Wang L.; Liang F.; Liu S. Carbon Energ. 2023, 5, e276.
[5]	Geng D.; Ding N.; Hor T. S. A.; Chien S. W.; Liu Z.; Wuu D.; Sun X.; Zong Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502164.
[6]	Chen K.; Huang G.; Zhang X.-B. Chin. J. Chem. 2021, 39, 32.
[7]	Shao Y.; Ding F.; Xiao J.; Zhang J.; Xu W.; Park S.; Zhang J.-G.; Wang Y.; Liu J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 987.
[8]	Yu Y.; Zhang X. Acta Chim. Sinic. 2020, 78, 1434 (in Chinese).
	(于越, 张新波, 化学学报, 2020, 78, 1434.)
[9]	Chen H.; Yang D.; Huang G.; Zhang X. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2024, 40, 2305059.
[10]	Pipes R.; Bhargav A.; Manthiram A. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900453.
[11]	Lv H.; Huang X. L.; Zhu X.; Wang B. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 25406.
[12]	Zhang S.; Chen M.; Zhao X.; Cai J.; Yan W.; Yen J. C.; Chen S.; Yu Y.; Zhang J. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2021, 4, 336.
[13]	Dang C.; Mu Q.; Xie X.; Sun X.; Yang X.; Zhang Y.; Maganti S.; Huang M.; Jiang Q.; Seok I.; Du W.; Hou C. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022, 5, 606.
[14]	Wang Y.; Zhang L.; Hu T. Acta Chim. Sinic. 2015, 73, 316 (in Chinese).
	(王瀛, 张丽敏, 胡天军, 化学学报, 2015, 73, 316.)
[15]	Wang Y.-J.; Fang B.; Zhang D.; Li A.; Wilkinson D. P.; Ignaszak A.; Zhang L.; Zhang J. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2018, 1, 1.
[16]	Zhang X.; Liu Y.; Zhao X.; Cheng Z.; Mu X. Energy Fue. 2024, 38, 19236.
[17]	Cameron J. M.; Holc C.; Kibler A. J.; Peake C. L.; Walsh D. A.; Newton G. N.; Johnson L. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 5863.
[18]	Lei J.; Lu Y.-C. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2024, 11, nwae320.
[19]	Ding Y.; Li Y.; Wu Z.-S. Battery Energ. 2023, 2, 20220014.
[20]	Liang Z.; Wang W.; Lu Y.-C. Joul. 2022, 6, 2458.
[21]	Asadi M.; Sayahpour B.; Abbasi P.; Ngo A. T.; Karis K.; Jokisaari J. R.; Liu C.; Narayanan B.; Gerard M.; Yasaei P.; Hu X.; Mukherjee A.; Lau K. C.; Assary R. S.; Khalili-Araghi F.; Klie R. F.; Curtiss L. A.; Salehi-Khojin A. Natur. 2018, 555, 502.
[22]	Song K.; Agyeman D. A.; Park M.; Yang J.; Kang Y.-M. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606572.
[23]	Viswanathan V.; Thygesen K. S.; Hummelshøj J. S.; Nørskov J. K.; Girishkumar G.; McCloskey B. D.; Luntz A. C. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 135, 214704.
[24]	Wen B.; Zhou L.; Wang Y.; Li F. Chem. Commun. 2025, 61, 6095.
[25]	Zhang P.; Ding M.; Li X.; Li C.; Li Z.; Yin L. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2001789.
[26]	Dou Y.; Xie Z.; Wei Y.; Peng Z.; Zhou Z. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2022, 9, nwac040.
[27]	Lim H.-D.; Lee B.; Zheng Y.; Hong J.; Kim J.; Gwon H.; Ko Y.; Lee M.; Cho K.; Kang K. Nat. Energ. 2016, 1, 16066.
[28]	Gao X.; Chen Y.; Johnson L. R.; Jovanov Z. P.; Bruce P. G. Nat. Energ. 2017, 2, 17118.
[29]	Zhao Q.; Katyal N.; Seymour I. D.; Henkelman G.; Ma T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12553.
[30]	Sun Z.; Lin X.; Dou W.; Tan Y.; Hu A.; Hou Q.; Yuan R.; Zheng M.; Dong Q. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2102764.
[31]	Zhang C.; Dandu N.; Rastegar S.; Misal S. N.; Hemmat Z.; Ngo A. T.; Curtiss L. A.; Salehi-Khojin A. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2000201.
[32]	Kim H.-S.; Kim B.; Park H.; Kim J.; Ryu W.-H. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2103527.
[33]	Zhu C.; Wang Y.; Shuai L.; Tang Y.; Qiu M.; Xie J.; Liu J.; Wen W.; Chen H.; Nan S.; Dou M.; He Q. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 1997.
[34]	Gao X.; Chen Y.; Johnson L.; Bruce P. G. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 882.
[35]	Prehal C.; Freunberger S. A. Joul. 2019, 3, 321.
[36]	Lim H.-D.; Song H.; Kim J.; Gwon H.; Bae Y.; Park K.-Y.; Hong J.; Kim H.; Kim T.; Kim Y. H.; Lepró X.; Ovalle-Robles R.; Baughman R. H.; Kang K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 3926.
[37]	Zeng X.; Leng L.; Liu F.; Wang G.; Dong Y.; Du L.; Liu L.; Liao S. Electrochim. Act. 2016, 200, 231.
[38]	Chen Y.; Freunberger S. A.; Peng Z.; Fontaine O.; Bruce P. G. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 489.
[39]	Kim H.; Kwak W.-J.; Jung H.-G.; Sun Y.-K. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 19, 148.
[40]	Liu H.; Liu M.; Yang L.; Song Y.; Wang X.; Yang K.; Pan F. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 6567.
[41]	Chen K.; Du J.-Y.; Wang J.; Yang D.-Y.; Chu J.-W.; Chen H.; Zhang H.-R.; Huang G.; Zhang X.-B. Chin. J. Chem. 2023, 41, 314.
[42]	Cao D.; Liu X.; Yuan X.; Yu F.; Chen Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface. 2021, 13, 39341.
[43]	Lian Z.; Lu Y.; Ma S.; Wang L.; Li Z.; Liu Q. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 138400.
[44]	Wang A.; Dai J.; Guo Y.; Ning F.; Liu X.; Subhan S.; Qin J.; Lu S.; Yi J. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2025, 36, 110186.
[45]	Yin W.; Grimaud A.; Azcarate I.; Yang C.; Tarascon J.-M. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 6546.
[46]	Khurram A.; He M.; Gallant B. M. Joul. 2018, 2, 2649.
[47]	Liu H.; Chen M.; Sun F.; Zaman S.; Wang M.; Wang H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface. 2022, 14, 13891.
[48]	Nandan R.; Bisen O. Y.; Nanda K. K. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 10378.
[49]	Christensen M. K.; Storm M. M.; Norby P. ECS Meet. Abstr. 2016, MA2016-02, 4072.
[50]	Lee Y. J.; Kwak W.-J.; Sun Y.-K.; Lee Y. J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface. 2018, 10, 526.
[51]	Ahn S.; Zor C.; Yang S.; Lagnoni M.; Dewar D.; Nimmo T.; Chau C.; Jenkins M.; Kibler A. J.; Pateman A.; Rees G. J.; Gao X.; Adamson P.; Grobert N.; Bertei A.; Johnson L. R.; Bruce P. G. Nat. Chem. 2023, 15, 1022.
[52]	Aetukuri N. B.; McCloskey B. D.; García J. M.; Krupp L. E.; Viswanathan V.; Luntz A. C. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 50.
[53]	Aurbach D.; McCloskey B. D.; Nazar L. F.; Bruce P. G. Nat. Energ. 2016, 1, 16128.
[54]	Johnson L.; Li C.; Liu Z.; Chen Y.; Freunberger S. A.; Ashok P. C.; Praveen B. B.; Dholakia K.; Tarascon J.-M.; Bruce P. G. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 1091.
[55]	Zhao Z.; Zhang X.; Zhou Z.; Wang E.; Peng Z. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 501.
[56]	Ryu W.-H.; Gittleson F. S.; Thomsen J. M.; Li J.; Schwab M. J.; Brudvig G. W.; Taylor A. D. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12925.
[57]	Jiang Z.; Wen B.; Huang Y.; Guo Y.; Wang Y.; Li F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202315314.
[58]	Sun X.; Mu X.; Zheng W.; Wang L.; Yang S.; Sheng C.; Pan H.; Li W.; Li C.-H.; He P.; Zhou H. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 536.
[59]	Wang Y.-F.; Song L.-N.; Zheng L.-J.; Wang Y.; Wu J.-Y.; Xu J.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202400132.
[60]	Zhang Z.; Bai W.-L.; Cai Z.-P.; Cheng J.-H.; Kuang H.-Y.; Dong B.-X.; Wang Y.-B.; Wang K.-X.; Chen J.-S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 16404.
[61]	Liang Z.; Lu Y.-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7574.
[62]	Chen Y.; Gao X.; Johnson L. R.; Bruce P. G. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 767.
[63]	Cao D.; Shen X.; Wang A.; Yu F.; Wu Y.; Shi S.; Freunberger S. A.; Chen Y. Nat. Catal. 2022, 5, 193.
[64]	Xing S.; Zhang Z.; Dou Y.; Li M.; Wu J.; Zhang Z.; Zhou Z. CCS Chemistr. 2023, 6, 1810.
[65]	Zhang J.; Tang G.-A.; Zeng Y.; Wang B.; Liu L.; Wu Q.; Yang L.; Wang X.; Hu Z. Acta Chim. Sinic. 2020, 78, 572 (in Chinese).
	(张静, 汤功奥, 曾誉, 王保兴, 刘力玮, 吴强, 杨立军, 王喜章, 胡征, 化学学报, 2020, 78, 572.)
[66]	Sun D.; Shen Y.; Zhang W.; Yu L.; Yi Z.; Yin W.; Wang D.; Huang Y.; Wang J.; Wang D.; Goodenough J. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 8941.
[67]	Cheng Y.; Dou Y.; Zhang X.; Song Y.; Liu S.; Wang Y.; Zhang H.; Chen X.; Qiu J.; Wei Y. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14, 6749.
[68]	Mandal S.; Samajdar R. N.; Parida S.; Mishra S.; Bhattacharyya A. J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface. 2022, 14, 26714.
[69]	Ashley D. C.; Jakubikova E. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 9907.
[70]	Yao K. P. C.; Frith J. T.; Sayed S. Y.; Bardé F.; Owen J. R.; Shao-Horn Y.; Garcia-Araez N. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 16290.
[71]	Wang B.; Wang X.; Cheng X.; Zhang J.; Yan M.; Li G.; Yang L.; Wu Q.; Wang X.; Hu Z. CCS Chem. 2020, 3, 1350.
[72]	Wang J.; Li D.; Chen Z.; Wu Z.; Chen B.; Liu X. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 22754.
[73]	Bergner B. J.; Schürmann A.; Peppler K.; Garsuch A.; Janek J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15054.
[74]	Bergner B. J.; Hofmann C.; Schürmann A.; Schröder D.; Peppler K.; Schreiner P. R.; Janek J. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 31769.
[75]	Kim J.; Lee J.; Jeong J.; Hwang C.; Song H.-K. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface. 2022, 14, 9066.
[76]	Ko Y.; Kim K.; Yoo J.; Kwon G.; Park H.; Kim J.; Lee B.; Song J.-H.; Kim J.; Kang K. Energy Environ. Sci. 2023, 16, 5525.
[77]	Yang C.; Han J.; Liu P.; Hou C.; Huang G.; Fujita T.; Hirata A.; Chen M. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1702752.
[78]	Qiao Y.; Ye S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 15830.
[79]	Zhang J.; Sun B.; Zhao Y.; Kretschmer K.; Wang G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 8505.
[80]	Ko Y.; Park H.; Lee K.; Kim S. J.; Park H.; Bae Y.; Kim J.; Park S. Y.; Kwon J. E.; Kang K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 5376.
[81]	Mushtaq M.; Guo X.; Zhang Z.; Lin Z.; Li X.; Peng Z.; Yu H. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 113, 199.
[82]	Li N.; Chang Z.; Zhong M.; Fu Z.-X.; Luo J.; Zhao Y.-F.; Li G.-B.; Bu X.-H. CCS Chem. 2020, 3, 1297.
[83]	Wang Y.; Song L.-N.; Wang Y.-F.; Li F.; Wang X.-X.; Wang H.-F.; Xu J.-J. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 45, 191.
[84]	Liu L.; Ge K.; Zhou C.; Kuai M.; Zhao L.; Ding Y.; Chen Y.; Fang W.; Wu Y. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 508, 160983.
[85]	Pande V.; Viswanathan V. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 60.
[86]	Li T.; Liu D.; Gao L.; Yu D.; Liu X.; Li L.; Kang W. Adv. Energy Mater. 2025, 15, 2403406.
[87]	Han X.-B.; Ye S. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 9790.
[88]	Askins E. J.; Zoric M. R.; Li M.; Amine R.; Amine K.; Curtiss L. A.; Glusac K. D. Nat. Chem. 2023, 15, 1247.
[89]	Lee H.-W.; Hwang J.; Kim J.-Y.; Morais G. N.; Tang K. S.; Choi M.; Choi H.; Youn H.-B.; Kim S.-T.; Ha J. H.; Kang S. J.; Chen S.; Suh S.-E.; Kwak W.-J. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2415805.
[90]	He Q.-F.; Zhang Y.-J.; Yang Z.-L.; Dong J.-C.; Lin X.-M.; Li J.-F. Chin. J. Chem. 2023, 41, 355.
[91]	Liao Y.; Zhang X.; Huang Z.; Zhuang X.; Gao M. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface. 2025, 17, 19629.
[92]	Wang Q.-Y.; Zheng M.-T.; Gao M.-L.; Liao Y.-L.; Zhang X.-P.; Fan C.; Chen W.-R.; Lu J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2312723.
[93]	Sun G.; Wang Y.; Yang D.; Zhang Z.; Lu W.; Feng M. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2024, 35, 108469.
[94]	Cao R.; Chen K.; Liu J.; Huang G.; Liu W.; Zhang X. Sci. China: Chem. 2024, 67, 122.
[95]	Jordan J. W.; Vailaya G.; Holc C.; Jenkins M.; McNulty R. C.; Puscalau C.; Tokay B.; Laybourn A.; Gao X.; Walsh D. A.; Newton G. N.; Bruce P. G.; Johnson L. R. Faraday Discuss. 2024, 248, 381.
[96]	Liu T.; Frith J. T.; Kim G.; Kerber R. N.; Dubouis N.; Shao Y.; Liu Z.; Magusin P. C. M. M.; Casford M. T. L.; Garcia-Araez N.; Grey C. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1428.
[97]	Kang J.-H.; Lee J.; Jung J.-W.; Park J.; Jang T.; Kim H.-S.; Nam J.-S.; Lim H.; Yoon K. R.; Ryu W.-H.; Kim I.-D.; Byon H. R. ACS Nan. 2020, 14, 14549.

媒介体催化在锂-空气电池中的应用与挑战^★

Applications and Challenges of Redox-Mediated Catalysis in Lithium-Air Batteries^★

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

图/表 5

参考文献 97

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

媒介体催化在锂-空气电池中的应用与挑战★

Applications and Challenges of Redox-Mediated Catalysis in Lithium-Air Batteries★

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

图/表 5

参考文献 97

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

媒介体催化在锂-空气电池中的应用与挑战^★

Applications and Challenges of Redox-Mediated Catalysis in Lithium-Air Batteries^★