研究论文

CuO/CeO2-ZrO2/SiC整体催化剂催化甲醇水蒸气重整制氢的研究

  • 焦桐 ,
  • 许雪莲 ,
  • 张磊 ,
  • 翁幼云 ,
  • 翁玉冰 ,
  • 高志贤
展开
  • a 辽宁石油化工大学 石油化工学院 抚顺 113001
    b 贵州木易精细陶瓷有限公司 贵阳 550000

收稿日期: 2020-12-10

  网络出版日期: 2021-02-05

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(21673270)

Research on CuO/CeO2-ZrO2/SiC Monolithic Catalysts for Hydrogen Production by Methanol Steam Reforming

  • Tong Jiao ,
  • Xue-lian Xu ,
  • Lei Zhang ,
  • You-yun Weng ,
  • Yu-bing Weng ,
  • Zhi-xian Gao
Expand
  • a School of Petrochemical Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113001, China
    b Guizhou Muyee Fine Ceramics Company Limited, Guiyang 550000, China

Received date: 2020-12-10

  Online published: 2021-02-05

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(21673270)

摘要

采用溶胶凝胶法制备了CeO2-ZrO2固溶体载体涂层, 再经浸渍法制备了高空速下性能较好的甲醇水蒸气重整制氢xCuO/CeO2-ZrO2/SiC整体催化剂. 采用X射线衍射(XRD)、比表面积测试(BET)、H2程序升温还原(H2-TPR)和X射线光电子能谱(XPS)等手段对催化剂进行了表征, 结果表明, 催化剂活性主要与Cu比表面积、活性组分与载体之间相互作用以及氧空穴量有关. 其中5%CuO/CeO2-ZrO2/SiC整体催化剂的Cu比表面积较大, 活性组分CuO与CeO2-ZrO2固溶体氧化物之间相互作用较强, 氧空穴量较多, 因此表现出较好的催化性能. 在反应温度为360 ℃、水醇物质的量比为1.2、甲醇水蒸气气体空速为4840 h–1的条件下, 甲醇转化率为89.9%, 产氢速率为1556 L•m–3•s–1. 与传统颗粒催化剂相比, SiC基整体催化剂的产氢速率更高, 更适用于高空速下的甲醇水蒸气重整制氢反应, 有利于小型化制氢反应器的集成.

本文引用格式

焦桐 , 许雪莲 , 张磊 , 翁幼云 , 翁玉冰 , 高志贤 . CuO/CeO2-ZrO2/SiC整体催化剂催化甲醇水蒸气重整制氢的研究[J]. 化学学报, 2021 , 79(4) : 513 -519 . DOI: 10.6023/A20120562

Abstract

Hydrogen proton exchange membrane fuel cell is considered as the most cleanest way with high energy efficiency of hydrogen energy utilization. However, the high storage and transportation cost of hydrogen can always be the important factors hindering its development. Fortunately, on-site hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming can effectively solve this problem, which has low reforming temperature and CO content in reforming gas. Monolithic catalyst, a kind of catalytic material, on which the active components loaded on the formed support are generally honeycombed structures with multiple parallel channels. Therefore, compared to the traditional beaded catalytic materials, the monolithic catalytic material has lower pressure drop and higher mass transfer efficiency, which means that the monolithic catalysts have a certain practical application prospect. Ceria-zirconia solid solution was prepared by the sol-gel method, then a series xCuO/CeO2-ZrO2/SiC catalysts were prepared by incipient-wetness impregnation method, and demonstrated considerable catalytic activity at high velocity reaction conditions. The catalyst samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), BET specific surface area test, H2-temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) techniques. According to the results, we proposed that the catalytic performances are mainly effected by the surface area of Cu, the interaction between active component and support, and the amount of oxygen vacancy. Among those catalysts, 5%CuO/CeO2-ZrO2/SiC had relatively higher copper specific surface area, stronger interaction between CuO and support, more oxygen vacancies, thus showing better catalytic activity. When the reaction temperature reached 360 ℃, with a water/methanol molar ratio of 1.2, methanol and water total gas hourly space velocity of 4840 h–1, the methanol conversion reached 89.9%, and the H2 production rate was 1556 L•m–3•s–1. When compared with the traditional bead catalyst, monolithic catalyst seems to be more suitable for high space velocity methanol steam reforming reaction, also the SiC support is chemical stable and has favorable thermal conductivity, which avoiding the device volume increase caused by the additional heating device, thus facilitating the integration of minitype reactors for hydrogen generation.

参考文献

[1]
Jung, C.; Nagel, L.; Schindler, D.; Grau, L. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43,23161.
[2]
Muradov, N. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42,14058.
[3]
Uyar, T.S.; Besikci, D. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42,2453.
[4]
Xi, H.J.; Hou, X.N.; Liu, Y.J.; Qing, S.J.; Gao, Z.X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53,11886.
[5]
Chi, H.; Andolina, C.M.; Li, J.; Curnan, M.T.; Saidi, W.A.; Zhou, G.W.; Yang, J.C.; Veser, G. Appl. Catal., A 2018, 556,64.
[6]
Jampa, S.; Jamieson, A.M.; Chaisuwan, T.; Luengnaruemithai, A.; Wongkasemjit, S. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42,15073.
[7]
Kuc, J.; Neumann, M.; Armbruster, M.; Yoon, S.; Zhang, Y.C.; Erni, R.; Weidenkaff, A.; Matam, S.K. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6,43.
[8]
Ma, Y.F.; Guan, G.Q.; Phanthong, P.; Li, X.M.; Cao, J.; Hao, X.G.; Wang, Z.D.; Abudula, A. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39,18803.
[9]
Sa, S.; Silva, H.; Brandao, L.; Sousa, J.M.; Mendes, A. Appl. Catal., B 2010, 99,43.
[10]
Yao, C.Z.; Zhang, X.R.; Wang, L.C.; Cao, Y.; Dai, W.L.; Fan, K.N.; Wu, D.; Sun, Y.H. Acta Chim. Sinica 2006, 64,269. (in Chinese)
[10]
( 姚成漳, 张新荣, 王路存, 曹勇, 戴维林, 范康年, 吴东, 孙予罕, 化学学报, 2006, 64,269.)
[11]
Kim, W.; Mohaideen, K.K.; Seo, D.J.; Yoon, W.L. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42,2081.
[12]
Zhou, J.J.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, G.S.; Mao, D.S.; Lu, G.Z. RSC Adv. 2016, 6,30176.
[13]
Das, D.; Llorca, J.; Dominguez, M.; Colussi, S.; Trovarelli, A.; Gayen, A. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40,10463.
[14]
Figueiredo, R.T.; Martinez-Arias, A.; Granados, M.L.; Fierro, J.L. G. J. Catal. 1998, 178,146.
[15]
Liu, Y.; Hayakawa, T.; Tsunoda, T.; Suzuki, K.; Hamakawa, S.; Murata, K.; Shiozaki, R.; Ishii, T.; Kumagai, M. Top. Catal. 2003, 22,205.
[16]
Khani, Y.; Bahadoran, F.; Safari, N.; Soltanali, S.; Taheri, S.A. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44,11824.
[17]
Zhou, S.L.; Yuan, Z.S.; Wang, S.D. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2006, 31,924.
[18]
Qi, A.D.; Wang, S.D.; Fu, G.Z.; Ni, C.J.; Wu, D.Y. Appl. Catal., A 2005, 281,233.
[19]
Suetsuna, T.; Suenaga, S.; Fukasawa, T. Appl. Catal., A 2004, 276,275.
[20]
Liu, N.; Yuan, Z.S.; Zhang, C.X.; Wang, S.J.; Li, D.Y.; Wang, S.D. Chin. J. Catal. 2005, 26,1078. (in Chinese)
[20]
( 刘娜, 袁中山, 张纯希, 王淑娟, 李德意, 王树东, 催化学报, 2005, 26,1078.)
[21]
Liu, N.; Wang, S.D.; Yuan, Z.S.; Zhang, C.X.; Wang, S.J.; Li, D.Y.; Fu, G.Z. CIESC J. 2004, 55,90. (in Chinese)
[21]
( 刘娜, 王树东, 袁中山, 张纯希, 王淑娟, 李德意, 付桂芝, 化工学报, 2004, 55,90.)
[22]
Liu, Y.J.; Wang, D.Z.; Zhang, L.; Bai, J.; Chen, L.; Liu, D.S. Fine Chem. 2018, 35,2045. (in Chinese)
[22]
( 刘玉娟, 王东哲, 张磊, 白金, 陈琳, 刘道胜, 精细化工, 2018, 35,2045.)
[23]
Putna, E.S.; Bunluesin, T.; Fan, X.L.; Gorte, R.J.; Vohs, J.M.; Lakis, R.E.; Egami, T. Catal. Today 1999, 50,343.
[24]
He, J.P.; Yang, Z.X.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Pan, L.W. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42,9930.
[25]
He, J.P.; Zhang, L.; Chen, L.; Yang, Z.X.; Tong, Y.F. Chem. J. Chinese U. 2017, 38,1822. (in Chinese)
[25]
( 贺建平, 张磊, 陈琳, 杨占旭, 佟宇飞, 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38,1822.)
[26]
Yang, S.Q.; Zhou, F.; Liu, Y.J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.H.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, C.S.; Liu, D.S. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44,7252.
[27]
She, W.; Qi, T.Q. J.; Cui, M.X.; Yan, P.F.; Weng, N.S. W.; Li, W.Z.; Li, G.M. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10,14698.
[28]
Wang, D.Z.; Feng, X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.H.; Bai, J.; Zhang, C.S.; Zhang, Z.Y. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2019, 47,1251. (in Chinese)
[28]
( 王东哲, 冯旭, 张健, 陈琳, 张磊, 王宏浩, 白金, 张财顺, 张政一, 燃料化学学报, 2019, 47,1251.)
[29]
Prusty, D.; Pathak, A.; Mukherjee, M.; Mukherjee, B.; Chowdhury, A. Mater. Charact. 2015, 10,31.
[30]
Bai, Y.X.; Wu, J.J.; Qiu, X.P.; Wang, J.S.; Zhu, W.T.; Chen, L.Q. Acta Chim. Sinica 2006, 64,527. (in Chinese)
[30]
( 白玉霞, 吴建军, 邱新平, 王建设, 朱文涛, 陈立泉, 化学学报, 2006, 64,527.)
[31]
Wang, Z.H.; Shi, G.Y.; Xia, J.F.; Zhang, F.F.; Xia, Y.Z.; Li, Y.H.; Xia, L.H. Acta Chim. Sinica 2013, 71,1225. (in Chinese)
[31]
( 王宗花, 史国玉, 夏建飞, 张菲菲, 夏延致, 李延辉, 夏临华, 化学学报, 2013, 71,1225.)
[32]
Zhang, L.; Pan, L.W.; Ni, C.J.; Sun, T.J.; Zhao, S.S.; Wang, S.D.; Wang, A.J.; Hu, Y.K. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38,4397.
[33]
Song, Q.L.; Men, Y.; Wang, J.G.; Liu, S.; Chai, S.S.; An, W.; Wang, K.; Li, Y.Y.; Tang, Y.H. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45,9592.
文章导航

/