电催化分解水制氢是新能源开发的重要策略。其中,水氧化反应具有较高的能量势垒和缓慢的动力学,被视为该过程的瓶颈。因此迫切需要开发高效稳定的阳极电极以提高水分解效率。本文以铁(III)配合物[Fe(bpy-pma)](bpy-pma=N1-(2-([2,2'-bipyridin]-6-yl)propan-2-yl)-N2-methyloxalamide)为前体,在pH=9.0的BBS中通过电沉积法原位制备了氧化铁薄膜电极,能够在过电位540 mV下催化水氧化反应,电流密度为1 mA cm-2,塔菲尔斜率为85 mV dec-1。1.3 V电压下进行控制电位电解,电流密度可达到7.3 mA cm-2,保持10小时以上未出现电流衰减。配体的引入,不仅影响薄膜形貌,还提高了薄膜中铁负载量及其电催化活性,克服了铁离子在中性到碱性条件下易形成沉淀析出,导致薄膜电极质量差、效率低、稳定性差等问题。
The depletion of petroleum reserves and imminent environmental problems has promoted the pursuit of clean and sustainable energy. Electrocatalytic water splitting to produce hydrogen represents a critical strategy in the field of new energy development. Water oxidation reaction is regarded as the bottleneck restricting the process due to the high energy demanding and slow kinetics process. Development of efficient and stable anode electrodes to enhance the efficiency of water splitting is essential. Here, Fe-based film electrode was in-situ prepared by electrodeposition directly from complex [Fe(bpy-pma)] (bpy-pma=N1-(2-([2,2'-bipyridin]-6-yl)propan-2-yl)-N2-methyloxalamide) in BBS (pH=9.0). The morphology, composition, structure and catalytic activity of the catalytic film were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and electrochemical measurements. The results indicate that the surface of the Fe-cat electrode is covered with cubic Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) measurements showed that 1.8 μg cm-2 of Fe was deposited on the Fe-cat electrode. The catalytic film exhibits an overpotential of 540 mV at 1 mA cm-2 current density and a Tafel slop of 85 mV dec-1 for water oxidation in carbonate/bicarbonate solution (pH=9.75). A stable current density of 7.3 mA cm-2 over 10 h was observed during controlled potential electrocatalysis (CPE) with an applied potential of 1.3 V. No current attenuation occurred in the longer-term CPE for 24 h. The electrolysis products, H2 and O2, were detected using gas chromatography (GC), yielding a calculated Faradaic efficiency of 99%. During the electrodeposition process, the slow dissociation of ligands effectively suppresses Fe(OH)3 precipitation, yielding ultrathin nanomembranes with uniform density. Compared with FeCl3 as a precursor, ligand coordination not only markedly modulates the film morphology but also greatly enhances the iron loading and electrocatalytic activity. This strategy overcame the problems of poor quality, low efficiency and poor stability of film electrode caused by the precipitation of iron ions under neutral to alkaline conditions.
[1] Chow J.;Kopp R. J. and Portney, P. R. Science,2003, 302, 1528-1532.
[2] Lewis, N. S. and Nocera, D. G., Proc Natl Acad Sci., 2006, 103, 15729-15735.
[3] Chen X.;Li C.;Grätzel M.;Kostecki R. and Mao, S. S., Chem. Soc. Rev.,2012, 41, 7909-7937.
[4] Lubitz W.;Reijerse E. J. and Messinger, J., Energy Environ. Sci.,2008, 1, 15-31.
[5] Dr. Haruo Inoue;Dr. Tetsuya Shimada;Youki Kou;Dr. Yu Nabetani;Dr. Dai Masui;Dr. Shinsuke Takagi and Tachibana, D. H. ChemSusChem,2011, 4, 173-179.
[6] Prato M R. A.;Fransaer J. and Dominguez-Benetton, X., J. Mater. Chem. A,2023, 11, 20824-20838.
[7] Lin J.;Zhang Z.;Guo M.;Zhang H.;Gao M.;Deng R.;Xu C. and Zhang, Q., Sustain Energ Fuels,2026, 10, 99-118.
[8] Chen M.;Wu Y.;Han Y.;Lin X.;Sun J.;Zhang W. and Cao, R., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces,2015, 7, 21852-21859.
[9] Li F.;Bai L.;Li H.;Wang Y.;Yu F. and Sun, L. Chem. Commun.,2016, 52, 5753-5756.
[10] Najafpour, M. M. and Hosseini, S. M., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41, 22635-22642.
[11] Pizzolato E.;Scaramuzza S.;Carraro F.;Sartori A.;Agnoli S.;Amendola V.;Bonchio M. and Sartorel, A., J. Energy Chem.,2016, 25, 246-250.
[12] Zhao Q.;Li D.;Gao G.;Yuan W.;Hao G. and Li, J., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy,2016, 41, 17193-17198.
[13] Kwong W. L.;Lee C. C.;Shchukarev A.;Björn E. and Messinger, J. J. Catal.,2018, 365, 29-35.
[14] Seabold, J. A. and Choi, K.-S.,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 2186-2192.
[15] Zhu Y. B.;Hua C. Y.;Xie T. T.;Wang G. L. and Feng, P. Z., Chin. J. Inorg. Chem.,2023, 39, 1103‐1112(in Chinese). (朱亚波, 华承烨, 谢婷婷, 王广兰, 冯培忠, 无机化学学报, 2023, 39, 1103-1112.)
[16] Yang S.-H.;Gao N.-N. and Gong Y.-Q.,Chin. J. Inorg. Chem., 2025, 41, 2175-2185(in Chinese). (杨绍华, 高娜娜, 弓亚琼,无机化学学报, 2025, 41, 2175-2185.)
[17] Yang X.-T.;Geng Z.-B.;Kuang S.-L. and Feng, S.-H., Chem J Chinese U,2020, 41, 56-61(in Chinese). (杨小天, 耿智彬, 况思良, 冯守华, 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41, 56-61.)
[18] Wu Y.;Chen M.;Han Y.;Luo H.;Su X.;Zhang M. T.;Lin X.;Sun J.;Wang L.;Deng L.;Zhang W. and Cao, R., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. ,2015, 127, 4952-4957.
[19] Chowdhury D. R.;Spiccia L.;Amritphale S. S.;Paul A. and Singh, A., J. Mater. Chem. A. ,2016, 4, 3655-3660
[20] Xu X.;Wei X.-Z.;Liu Q.;Liao F.-J.;Ye C.;Tung C.-H. and Wu, L.-Z., Inorg. Chem. Front.,2025, 12, 6335-6341.
[21] Kamlesh;Mehra P.;Tavar D.;Prakash S.;Sharma R. K.;Srivastava A. K.;Paul A. and Singh, A. Langmuir,2023, 39, 6088-6101.