Chinese Journal of Organic Chemistry >
Design, Synthesis and Activity Evaluation of New Tylosin Derivatives
Received date: 2021-07-24
Revised date: 2021-08-29
Online published: 2022-02-24
Supported by
National Key Research and Development Project of China(2017YFD0501400)
Tylosin, as one of the important members of 16 membered macrolide antibiotics, has been widely used in the treatment of infectious diseases caused by gram-positive bacteria and mycoplasma, but has little therapeutic effect on infectious diseases caused by gram-negative bacteria and drug-resistant bacteria. At present, one of the purposes modifying tylosin is to expand its antibacterial spectrum. In this paper, using tylosin and its hydrolysate decarbomycin tylosin (desmycosin) and 5-O-mycaminosyltylonolide (OMT) as mother nucleus, 18 new tylosin semisynthetic derivatives were designed and synthesized by modifying the C-20 position, introducing side chain containing 3-quinoline or 3-pyridine, and then their antibacterial activities were evaluated. The target compounds were confirmed by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS. The in vitro anti-sensitive bacteria activity showed that 20-deoxy-20-(N-p-fluorobenzyl-N-(1-(3-quinolyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methylamino)-5-O-my- caminosyltylonolide (4g) performed the most prominently. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of compound 4g against S. aureus and E. coli were < 0.0625 and 4 μg•mL–1. The in vitro anti-drug resistant bacteria activity showed that MIC values of compound 4g against S. hemolyticus and E. coli were < 0.0625 and 8 μg•mL–1. This provides a theoretical basis for further structural optimization and discovery of novel tylosin derivatives with wider antibacterial spectrum and better antibacterial activity.
Huanhuan Wang , Pu Yang , Hongjin Zhai , Shuo Zhang , Yaquan Cao , Yingxue Yang , Chunli Wu . Design, Synthesis and Activity Evaluation of New Tylosin Derivatives[J]. Chinese Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2022 , 42(2) : 557 -572 . DOI: 10.6023/cjoc202107050
| [1] | Blondeau, J. M. Expert. Opin. Pharmaco. 2002, 3, 1131. |
| [2] | Culic, O.; Erakovic, V.; Parnham, M. J. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2001, 429, 209. |
| [3] | Kirst, H. A. Prog. Med. Chem. 1994, 31, 265. |
| [4] | Clancy, J.; Dib-Hajj, F.; Petitpas, J. W. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 23. |
| [5] | Przybylski, P. Curr. Org. Chem. 2011, 15, 328. |
| [6] | Arsic, B.; Barber, J.; Cikos, A. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 51, 283. |
| [7] | Kirst, H. A. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 1997, 6, 103. |
| [8] | Hamill, R. L.; Haney, M. E.; Stamper, M.; Wiley, P. F. Antibiot. Chemother. 1961, 11, 328. |
| [9] | Blondeau, J. M. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2002, 3, 1131. |
| [10] | Culic, O.; Erakovic, V.; Parnham, M. J. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2001, 429, 209. |
| [11] | Tsutsui, A.; Hirose, T.; Ishiyama, A. J. Antibiot. 2013, 66, 191. |
| [12] | Fu, H.; Marquez, S.; Gu, X. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 1259. |
| [13] | Pan, H.-L. Chem. Eng. Equip. 2012, 9, 12. (in Chinese) |
| [13] | ( 潘海龙, 化学工程与装备, 2012, 9, 12.) |
| [14] | Kolb, H.C.; Finn, M. G.; Shapless, K. B. Angew. Chern., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 11. |
| [15] | Mizoguchi, H.; Watanabe, R.; Minami, S.; Oikawa, H.; Oguri, H. ChemInform 2015. 13, 5955. |
| [16] | Sugawara, A.; Maruyama, H.; Shibusawa, S. J. Antibiot. 2017, 70, 878. |
| [17] | Dunkle, J. A.; Xiong, L.; Mankin, A. S. PNAS 2010, 107, 17157. |
| [18] | Kirst, H. A.; Toth, J. E.; Wind, J. A. J Antibiot. 1987, 40, 823. |
| [19] | Shun, J. K.; Tsutomu, T.; Sumio, U. B. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1992, 65, 3405. |
| [20] | Lorenc, J.; Dyminska, L.; Mohmed, A. F. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 334, 90. |
| [21] | Zhuang, W.; Liu, H.; Li, J.; Chen, L.; Wang, G. Front. Microb. 2017, 8, 2573. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |