化学学报 2009, 67(24) 2785-2790 DOI:     ISSN: 0567-7351 CN: 31-1320/O6

本期目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索                                                            [打印本页]   [关闭]
研究论文
扩展功能
本文信息
Supporting info
PDF(369KB)
[HTML全文]
参考文献[PDF]
参考文献
服务与反馈
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
引用本文
Email Alert
文章反馈
浏览反馈信息
本文关键词相关文章
磺化聚醚醚酮
质子电导率
钒离子渗透率
全钒氧化还原液流电池
本文作者相关文章
李良琼
陈金伟
鲁惠
姜春萍
高山
杨鑫
练晓娟
刘效疆
王瑞林
PubMed
Article by Li, L. Q.
Article by Chen, J. W.
Article by Lu, H.
Article by Jiang, C. P.
Article by Gao, S.
Article by Yang, X.
Article by Lian, X. J.
Article by Liu, X. J.
Article by Wang, R. L.
不同磺化度下的磺化聚醚醚酮对全钒储能液流电池性质影响的研究
李良琼,陈金伟,鲁 惠,姜春萍,高 山,杨 鑫,刘效疆,王瑞林
摘要

本文报道了采用浓硫酸作为磺化剂,成功合成了不同磺化度下的聚醚醚酮(PEEK)膜,并深入研究了磺化条件包括磺化时间和磺化剂的用量对所获薄膜性能的影响,获得了在不同磺化度(DS)下SPPEK膜的离子交换容,含水率,机械性能,质子电导率等参数,特别测定了在全钒液流电池工作条件下钒离子(Ⅳ)渗透率,首次为该类液流储能电池使用价廉质优的质子交换膜提供了基础实验数据。室温条件下的实验结果如下:1)磺化12小时后,膜的磺化度46%,含水量为28%,钒离子(Ⅳ)选择性最佳(钒离子渗透率为1.2×10-7 cm2/min-1,是Nafion117 (2.9×10-6 cm2/min-1)的1/24),其质子电导率只有0.02 S/cm;2)磺化96小时其磺化度达79%的膜,质子电导率达0.16 S/cm,是Nafion117 (0.10S/cm) 的1.6倍, 但其机械性能最差;3)与Nafion117膜相比,磺化在36到48小时的SPPEK膜其机械力学性能好,薄膜的钒离子渗透率、离子交换容IEC、质子导电率和含水率高,且对钒离子的选择性佳,尤其价格仅为Nafion膜的1/13,是理想的Nafion膜的代替物,可望直接应用于全钒氧化还原液流(VRB)电池中。本文还讨论了磺化时间和不同磺化剂量对膜的性质的影响。

关键词 磺化聚醚醚酮   质子电导率   钒离子渗透率   全钒氧化还原液流电池  
Effect of Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone) Membranes with Different Sulfonation Degrees on the Performance of Vanadium Redox Flow Battery
Abstract:

Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) materials were prepared by sulfonation of
poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) in the concentrated H2SO4 (ca. 98%) under different time, and the SPEEK
membranes were cast by a casting method and characterized by many methods. These key parameters were
firstly obtained and reported, such as the ion exchange capacity (IEC), water uptake, mechanical property,
proton conductivity of the membranes and vanadium(IV) ion permeability in SPEEK membranes with
different degrees of sulfonation (DS). The following results were observed: (1) the membrane prepared by
sulfonation for 12 h with DS of 46% had water uptake of 28%, and the vanadium(IV) ion permeability withthe lowest proton conductivity of 0.02 S•cm-1 in SPEEK had 1.2×10-7 cm2•min-1, which was 1/24 of that
in Nafion 117; (2) the membrane prepared by sulfonation for 96 h with DS of 79% had the proton conductivity
of 0.16 S•cm-1 which was 1.6 times higher than it in Nafion 117, but had the worst mechanical property;
(3) the membranes with sulfonation for 36~48 h, compared with Nafion 117, not only had good integration
properties such as good property of mechanics, high IEC, proton conductivity, water uptake and
better selectivity to V(IV) ion, but also had very low price, which was 1/13 of that of the Nafion 117. Based
upon above properties, the SPEEK membranes prepared by appropriate time are more likely to be one of the
substitutes of Nafion 117 for vanadium redox flow battery (VRF) system. The effects of the degree of sulfonation
of PEEK polymer and the amount of H2SO4 were also discussed.

Keywords: sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)   proton conductivity   vanadium ion permeability   vanadiumredox flow battery  
收稿日期 2009-03-04 修回日期 2009-05-11 网络版发布日期 2010-02-04 
DOI:
基金项目:

863

通讯作者: 王瑞林
作者简介:
作者Email: rl.wang@scu.edu.cn

参考文献:

1 (a) Sukkar, T.; Skyllas-Kazacos, M. J. Membr. Sci. 2003,
222, 249.
(b) Hwang, G. J.; Ohya, H. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 132, 55.
2 Zeng, J.; Jiang, C.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhu, S.; Zhao, B.;
Wang, R. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10, 372.
3 Chen, J.; Maekawa, Y.; Asano, M.; Yoshida, M. Polymer
2007, 48, 6002.
4 Sambandam, S.; Ramani, V. J. Power Sources 2007, 170,
259.
5 Di Vona, M. L.; Ahmed, Z.; Bellitto, S.; Lenci, A.;
Traversa, E.; Licoccia, S. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 296, 156.
6 Silva, V. S.; Ruffmann, B.; Vetter, S.; Mendes, A.; Madeira,
L. M.; Nunes, S. P. Catal. Today 2005, 104, 205.
7 Krishnan, P.; Park, J.-S.; Yang, T.-H.; Lee, W.-Y.; Kim,
C.-S. J. Power Sources 2006, 163, 2.
8 Othman, M. H. D.; Ismail, A. F.; Mustafa, A. J. Membr. Sci.
2007, 299, 156.
9 Zhang, G. W.; Zhou, Z. T. Battery 2005, 35, 4 (in Chinese).
(张高文, 周震涛, 电池, 2005, 35, 4.)
10 Wiedemann, E.; Heintz, A.; Lichtenthaler, R. N. J. Membr.
Sci. 1998, 141, 215.
11 Bishop, M. T.; Karasz, F. E.; Russo, P. S.; Langley, K. H.
Macromolecules 1985, 18, 86.
12 Jaafar, J.; Ismail, A. F.; Mustafa, A. Mater. Sci. Eng. A
2007, 460~461, 475.
13 Fu, T.; Wang, J.; Ni, J.; Cui, Z.; Zhong, S.; Zhao, C.; Na,H.; Xing, W. Solid State Ionics 2008, 179, 2265.
14 Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 226, 159.
15 Kreuer, K. D. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 185, 29.
16 Wiedemann, E.; Heintz, A.; Lichtenthaler, R. N. J. Membr.
Sci. 1998, 141, 207.
17 Meier, F.; Kerres, J.; Eigenberger, G. J. Membr. Sci. 2004,
241, 137.
18 Elabd, Y. A.; Napadensky, E.; Sloan, J. M.; Crawford, D.
M.; Walker, C. W. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 217, 227.
19 Pivovar, B. S.; Wang, Y.; Cussler, E. L. J. Membr. Sci.
1999, 154, 155.

本刊中的类似文章

Copyright by 化学学报