纳米通道单分子检测P53蛋白与DNA的弱相互作用

doi:10.6023/A12110982

化学学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 71 ›› Issue (01): 44-50.DOI: 10.6023/A12110982 上一篇下一篇

研究论文

纳米通道单分子检测P53蛋白与DNA的弱相互作用

应佚伦^a, 张星^a, 刘钰^a, 薛梦竹^b, 李洪林^b,c, 龙亿涛^a

a 华东理工大学上海市功能性材料化学重点实验室上海 200237;
b 华东理工大学药学院上海 200237;
c 中国科学院上海药物研究所药物发现与设计中心上海 201203

投稿日期:2012-11-29 发布日期:2012-12-25
通讯作者: 龙亿涛 E-mail:ytlong@ecust.edu.cn
基金资助:
项目受国家自然科学基金(No. 91027035)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项(Nos. WK1013002, WB1113005)资助. 龙亿涛教授受国家杰出青年基金(No. 21125522)和上海高校特聘教授(东方学者)资助.

Single Molecule Study of the Weak Biological Interactions Between P53 and DNA

Ying Yilun^a, Zhang Xing^a, Liu Yu^a, Xue Mengzhu^b, Li Honglin^b,c, Long Yitao^a

a Shanghai Key Laboratory of Functional Materials Chemistry, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237;
b School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237;
c Drug Discovery and Design Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Academia Sinica, Shanghai 201203

Received:2012-11-29 Published:2012-12-25
Supported by:
Project supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 91027035) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. WK1013002, WB1113005). Long Yitao is supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (No. 21125522) and the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning.

文章分享

1. 纳米通道单分子检测P53蛋白与DNA的弱相互作用.PDF(1352KB)

摘要/Abstract

利用基于α-溶血素(α-HL)的纳米通道单分子检测技术在单分子水平上探测位于肿瘤抑制蛋白P53 DNA结合域的多肽分子(P53-P)与含有p21^waf1/cip1基因结合域的双链DNA (B40)之间弱相互作用. 在电场力的作用下, 单个P53-P/B40复合物被α-HL纳米通道捕获并限制在其前庭中. 通过空间限域作用, P53-P与B40之间的弱相互作用被放大为具有显著电压依赖性的复合物-α-HL间强烈的相互作用, 从而产生极易分辨的离子流特征阻断信号. 统计分析特征阻断信号显示P53-P与B40之间的弱相互作用使得B40产生微小的构型变化. 分子对接模拟进一步证明, P53-P能够插入B40的小沟并使得小沟间距变窄. 因此, 基于α-HL的纳米通道单分子检测技术可以作为研究单个生物大分子间弱相互作用的超灵敏分析方法.

关键词: 纳米通道单分子检测技术, α-溶血素, P53蛋白, 弱相互作用

Many important cellular events, including protein-DNA interactions, are attributed to weak interactions. Almost all of the known biological functions of P53 depend critically upon its DNA-binding properties via numerous weak interactions. At the single-molecule level, information about the weak interactions between each residue of the P53 DNA binding domain (P53 DBD) and DNA is essential for understanding the biological function of P53 and for anti-cancer drug design. Here, we used the α-hemolysin (α-HL) pore to detect the weak interaction between a peptide of the P53 DBD (P53-P) and a 40-bp double-stranded DNA (B40) that includes the p21^waf1/cip1 DNA response element. The weak interactions in the complex of p53-P and B40 (p53-P:B40) produce a unique current trace through an α-HL nanopore with diagnostic ionic current blockages. Each current trace at a particular potential is related to the characterized behavior of captured p53-P:B40. Nanopore analysis indicates that the conformation of B40 might be changed by binding to p53-P, this change is confirmed by the molecule docking simulation. In the presence of the weak interactions between p53-P and B40, the analyte exhibits an increase in the rate constant of association with the nanopore vestibule. This reveals that the analyte-pore interactions could be enhanced by the weak interactions between p53-P and B40. The distorted B40 might be prone to translocate through the narrow constriction in the nanopore at the higher potential (＞+120 mV). Moreover, our findings demonstrate that the structure of distorted B40 in p53-P:B40 could be broken by the electric force. Our results support the possibility of identifying the weak interaction between two biomolecules. In addition, the analyte-pore association rate constant could be used to estimate the weak binding energy between different parts of the p53 binding domain and the target sequence. The signatures of the current trace may assist in the prediction of the conformational changes of biomolecules at the single-molecule level. Our observations suggest that a biological α-HL nanopore could be a candidate biosensor for predicting the conformational changes that result from weak interactions.

Key words: nanopore, α-hemolysin, P53, weak interaction

引用此文

应佚伦, 张星, 刘钰, 薛梦竹, 李洪林, 龙亿涛. 纳米通道单分子检测P53蛋白与DNA的弱相互作用[J]. 化学学报, 2013, 71(01): 44-50.

Ying Yilun, Zhang Xing, Liu Yu, Xue Mengzhu, Li Honglin, Long Yitao. Single Molecule Study of the Weak Biological Interactions Between P53 and DNA[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2013, 71(01): 44-50.

导出引用 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

分享此文

参考文献

[1] Johnson, D. S.; Mortazavi, A.; Myers, R. M.; Wold, B. Science 2007, 316, 1497.
[2] Cho, Y.; Gorina, S.; Jeffrey, P.; Pavletich, N. Science 1994, 265, 346.
[3] Ozaki, T.; Nakagawara, A. Cancers 2011, 3, 994.
[4] Joerger, A. C.; Ang, H. C.; Fersht, A. R. Proc. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103, 15056.
[5] (a) McKinney, K.; Mattia, M.; Gottifredi, V.; Prives, C. Mol. Cell 2004, 16, 413; (b) Zhu, X.; Li, K.; Liu, L.; Wang, J.-X.; Liu, Y.-N. Acta Chim. Sinica 2008, 66, 2379. (朱旭, 李凯, 刘林, 王建秀, 刘又年, 化学学报, 2008, 66, 2379.)
[6] (a) Nagaich, A. K.; Zhurkin, V. B.; Sakamoto, H.; Gorin, A. A.; Clore, G. M.; Gronenborn, A. M.; Appella, E.; Harrington, R. E. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 14830; (b) Nagaich, A. K.; Zhurkin, V. B.; Durell, S. R.; Jernigan, R. L.; Appella, E.; Harrington, R. E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96, 1875.
[7] (a) Kasianowicz, J.; Brandin, E.; Branton, D.; Deamer, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996, 93, 13770; (b) Gu, L.-Q.; Cheley, S.; Bayley, H. Science 2001, 291, 636; (c) Deamer, D. W.; Branton, D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 817; (d) Lathrop, D. K.; Ervin, E. N.; Barrall, G. A.; Keehan, M. G.; Kawano, R.; Krupka, M. A.; White, H. S.; Hibbs, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1878.
[8] (a) Song, L.; Hobaugh, M.; Shustak, C.; Cheley, S.; Bayley, H.; Gouaux, J. Science 1996, 274, 1859; (b) Menestrina, G.; Serra, M. D.; Lazarovici, P. In Pore-forming Peptides and Protein Toxins, Vol. 5, Ed.: Lazarovici, P., London, Taylor & Francis, 2005, p. 3.
[9] (a) Schibel, A. E. P.; An, N.; Jin, Q.; Fleming, A. M.; Burrows, C. J.; White, H. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 17992; (b) Schibel, A. E. P.; Fleming, A. M.; Jin, Q.; An, N.; Liu, J.; Blakemore, C. P.; White, H. S.; Burrows, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14778; (c) An, N.; Fleming, A. M.; White, H. S.; Burrows, C. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 11504.
[10] (a) Sutherland, T. C.; Long, Y.-T.; Stefureac, R.-I.; Bediako-Amoa, I.; Kraatz, H.-B.; Lee, J. S. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1273; (b) Zhao, Q.; de Zoysa, R. S. S.; Wang, D.; Jayawardhana, D. A.; Guan, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6324; (c) Movileanu, L.; Schmittschmitt, J. P.; Martin Scholtz, J.; Bayley, H. Biophys. J. 2005, 89, 1030; (d) Wang, H. Y.; Ying, Y. L.; Li, Y.; Kraatz, H. B.; Long, Y.-T. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 1746; (e) Ying, Y. L.; Li, D. W.; Liu, Y.; Dey, S. K.; Kraatz, H. B.; Long, Y.-T. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8784; (f) Long, Y.-T.; Zhang, M. N. Sci. China Ser. B 2009, 52, 731.
[11] (a) Mohammad, M.; Prakash, S.; Matouschek, A.; Movileanu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4081; (b) Oukhaled, G.; Mathe, J.; Biance, A. L.; Bacri, L.; Betton, J. M.; Lairez, D.; Pelta, J.; Auvray, L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 158101; (c) Rotem, D.; Jayasinghe, L.; Salichou, M.; Bayley, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 2781; (d) Payet, L.; Martinho, M.; Pastoriza-Gallego, M.; Betton, J. M.; Auvray, L.; Pelta, J.; Mathé, J. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 4071; (e) Wang, H. Y.; Ying, Y. L.; Li, Y.; Long, Y.-T. Chem.-Asian J. 2010, 5, 1952.
[12] (a) Hurt, N.; Wang, H.; Akeson, M.; Lieberman, K. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3772; (b) Lieberman, K. R.; Cherf, G. M.; Doody, M. J.; Olasagasti, F.; Kolodji, Y.; Akeson, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 17961; (c) Ying, Y. L.; Li, D. W.; Li, Y.; Lee, J. S.; Long, Y.-T. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 5690; (d) Wen, S.; Zeng, T.; Liu, L.; Zhao, K.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, X.; Wu, H. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18312; (e) Ying, Y.-L.; Wang, H.-Y.; Sutherland, T. C.; Long, Y.-T. Small 2011, 7, 87.
[13] (a) Wu, H.-C.; Bayley, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6813;(b) Lu, S.; Li, W. W.; Rotem, D.; Mikhailova, E.; Bayley, H. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 921; (c) Jayawardhana, D. A.; Crank, J. A.; Zhao, Q.; Armstrong, D. W.; Guan, X. Anal. Chem. 2008, 81, 460.
[14] (a) Cherf, G. M.; Lieberman, K. R.; Rashid, H.; Lam, C. E.; Karplus, K.; Akeson, M. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 344; (b) Rosenstein, J. K.; Wanunu, M.; Merchant, C. A.; Drndic, M.; Shepard, K. L. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 487; (c) Pennisi, E. Science 2012, 336, 534;(d) Clarke, J.; Wu, H.; Jayasinghe, L.; Patel, A.; Reid, S.; Bayley, H. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 265.
[15] (a) Venkatesan, B. M.; Bashir, R. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 615; (b) Branton, D.; Deamer, D. W.; Marziali, A.; Bayley, H.; Benner, S. A.; Butler, T.; Di Ventra, M.; Garaj, S.; Hibbs, A.; Huang, X. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 1146; (c) Martin, C. R.; Siwy, Z. S. Science 2007, 317, 331.
[16] (a) Purnell, R. F.; Schmidt, J. J. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 2533; (b) Stoddart, D.; Maglia, G.; Mikhailova, E.; Heron, A. J.; Bayley, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 122, 566.
[17] (a) Cockroft, S. L.; Chu, J.; Amorin, M.; Ghadiri, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 818; (b) Deamer, D. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2010, 39, 79.
[18] (a) Gottifredi, V.; Karni-Schmidt, O.; Shieh, S. Y.; Prives, C. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 1066; (b) Xu, Z.-Y.; Zhao, L.-L.; Cao, Z.-X.; Wang, J.-H. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2012, 28, 1665. (许朝莹, 赵立岭, 曹赞霞, 王吉华, 物理化学学报, 2012, 28, 1665); (c) Song, S.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Li, G.; Fan, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8670.
[19] Henrickson, S. E.; Misakian, M.; Robertson, B.; Kasianowicz, J. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 3057.
[20] (a) Sauer-Budge, A. F.; Nyamwanda, J. A.; Lubensky, D. K.; Branton, D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 90, 238101;. (b) Howorka, S.; Bayley, H. Biophys. J. 2002, 83, 3202; (c) DeGuzman, V. S.; Lee, C. C.; Deamer, D. W.; Vercoutere, W. A. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 6425.
[21] Vercoutere, W. A.; Winters-Hilt, S.; DeGuzman, V. S.; Deamer, D.; Ridino, S. E.; Rodgers, J. T.; Olsen, H. E.; Marziali, A.; Akeson, M. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 1311.
[22] Chu, J.; González-López, M.; Cockroft, S. L.; Amorin, M.; Ghadiri, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 122, 10304.

纳米通道单分子检测P53蛋白与DNA的弱相互作用

Single Molecule Study of the Weak Biological Interactions Between P53 and DNA

PDF

补充材料

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

[1]	杨磊, 葛娇阳, 王访丽, 吴汪洋, 郑宗祥, 曹洪涛, 王洲, 冉雪芹, 解令海. 一种基于芴的大环结构的有效降低内重组能的理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(6): 613-619.
[2]	周丽, 徐立进, 龚汉元. 自组装中的苯二甲酸阴离子形貌及质子化效应[J]. 化学学报, 2014, 72(4): 447-455.
[3]	潘清江, 郭元茹, 张红星, 付宏刚. 双核Au(I)磷硫配合物激发态性质和金属间弱相互作用的从头算研究[J]. 化学学报, 2007, 65(7): 595-600.