SIOC English
化学学报
高级检索

化学学报 >

2021 , Vol. 79 >Issue 11: 1394 - 1400

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6023/A21080358

研究论文

双齿氮配体螯合五价碘试剂介导的苯酚氧化去芳构化机理的理论研究

  • 张丹琪 ,
  • 邵英博 ,
  • 郑汉良 ,
  • 周碧莹 ,
  • 薛小松
展开
  • 南开大学元素有机化学国家重点实验室 化学学院 天津 300071

收稿日期: 2021-08-01

  网络出版日期: 2021-09-10

基金资助

项目受国家自然科学基金(21933004); 项目受国家自然科学基金(21772098); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助

收起

Mechanistic Study on the Bidentate Nitrogen-Ligated Iodine(V) Reagent Promoted Oxidative Dearomatization of Phenols

  • Danqi Zhang ,
  • Yingbo Shao ,
  • Hanliang Zheng ,
  • Biying Zhou ,
  • Xiao-Song Xue
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Elemento-Organic Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
* E-mail:

Received date: 2021-08-01

  Online published: 2021-09-10

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(21933004); National Natural Science Foundation of China(21772098); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Fold

摘要

采用密度泛函理论方法研究了不同配体螯合五价碘试剂介导的苯酚氧化去芳构化反应机理以及配体对试剂活性的影响机制. 揭示了双齿氮配体具有双重作用: 一方面通过配位螯合作用增强五价碘试剂2-碘酰苯甲酸(2-iodoxybenzoic acid, IBX)的反应活性, 另一方面作为碱捕获反应中生成的强酸, 避免强酸与邻醌产物发生进一步反应, 从而提高反应的总收率. 研究结果将增加和深化对配体调控高价碘试剂反应性的认识和理解, 为理性设计与开发新配体和反应提供理论依据.

关键词： 双齿氮配体; 五价碘试剂; 氧化去芳构化; 邻醌; 密度泛函理论计算

本文引用格式

张丹琪 , 邵英博 , 郑汉良 , 周碧莹 , 薛小松 . 双齿氮配体螯合五价碘试剂介导的苯酚氧化去芳构化机理的理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2021 , 79(11) : 1394 -1400 . DOI: 10.6023/A21080358

Abstract

Hypervalent iodine reagents, as a type of environmentally friendly and economical oxidants, have received extensive attention from synthetic chemistry in recent years. There are two kinds of common hypervalent iodine reagents: iodine(III) and iodine(V) reagents. Among various iodine(V) based reagents, 2-iodoxybenzoic acid (IBX) is one of the most commonly used oxidants in organic chemistry and has been widely used in selective oxidation of phenols, alcohols, thioethers and many other compounds. Although the IBX can efficiently oxidize electron-rich phenols to obtain o-quinones, which have important applications in catalysis and materials science, the synthesis of electron-deficient o-quinones is still challenging and remains an unsolved problem. Recently, a novel bidentate nitrogen-ligated iodine(V) reagent has been found to efficiently and selectively promote the oxidative dearomatization of electron-deficient phenols to o-quinones. The bidentate-nitrogen ligand has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in the successful oxidative dearomatization of electron-deficient phenols. To understand the origin of the effect of bidentate-nitrogen ligand on oxidative dearomatization, we herein conducted a detailed mechanistic study on the oxidative dearomatization of phenols promoted by iodine(V) reagents with different ligands by using density functional theory (DFT). Geometry optimizations and frequency calculations were carried out at the M06-2X/[6-31G(d,p)+LANL2DZ(I)] level of theory. To obtain more accurate electronic energies, single-point energy were calculated at the M06-2X/[6-311+G(2d,p)+def2-TZVPP(I)] level of theory. The solvation model based on density (SMD) was used to account for the solvation effect of chloroform, the solvents used in the experiment. Calculations revealed that the bidentate-nitrogen ligand not only enhances the reactivity of iodine(V) reagent but also acts as a base to neutralize the strong acid generated in the reaction to prevent product degradation. The insights into the effect of the bidentate-nitrogen ligand on the reactivity of hypervalent iodine reagent obtained from this study would facilitate the future design of novel ligand- regulated hypervalent iodine reagents for new reactions.

Key words： bidentate-nitrogen ligand; iodine(V) reagent; oxidative dearomatization; o-quinone; DFT calculation

参考文献

[1]
(a) Zhdankin V. V. Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry: Preparation, Structure, and Synthetic Applications of Polyvalent Iodine Compounds, Wiley, New York, 2013.
[1]
(b) Chen J.; Qu H.; Peng J.; Chen C. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 35, 937. (in Chinese)
[1]
( 陈静, 曲红梅, 彭静, 陈超, 有机化学, 2015, 35, 937.)
[1]
(c) Duan Y.; Jiang S.; Han Y.; Sun B.; Zhang C. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 36, 1973. (in Chinese)
[1]
( 段亚南, 姜山, 韩永超, 孙博, 张弛, 有机化学, 2016, 36, 1973.)
[1]
(d) Yoshimura A.; Zhdankin V. V. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 3328.
[1]
(e) Zhang X.; Cong Y.; Lin G.; Guo X.; Cao Y.; Lei K.; Du Y. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 36, 2513. (in Chinese)
[1]
( 张翔, 丛颖, 林光宇, 郭旭亮, 曹阳, 雷坤华, 杜云飞, 有机化学, 2016, 36, 2513.)
[1]
(f) Ma J.; Chen L.; Yuan Z.; Cheng H. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 38, 1586. (in Chinese)
[1]
( 马姣丽, 陈立成, 袁中文, 程辉成, 有机化学, 2018, 38, 1586.)
[1]
(g) Parra A. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 12033.
[1]
(h) Cai Q.; Ma H. Acta Chim. Sinica 2019, 77, 213. (in Chinese)
[1]
( 蔡倩, 马浩文, 化学学报, 2019, 77, 213.)
[1]
(i) Zhang B.; Li X.; Guo B.; Du Y. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 14119.
[1]
(j) Yang X.; Hu Z.; Jia M.; Du F.; Zhang C. Synlett 2021, 32, 1289.
[2]
(a) Qin K.; Su G.; Rao W.; Tan G. M. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 26, 1623. (in Chinese)
[2]
( 覃开云, 苏桂发, 饶万平, 谭光明, 有机化学, 2006, 26, 1623.)
[2]
(b) Satam V.; Harad A.; Rajule R.; Pati H. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 7659.
[2]
(c) Duschek A.; Kirsch S. F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1524.
[2]
(d) Zhang S.; Wu H.; Tang Y. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 41, 490. (in Chinese)
[2]
( 张书瑜, 吴昊天, 汤峨, 有机化学, 2021, 41, 490.)
[3]
(a) Pierpont C. G. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 216, 99.
[3]
(b) Kharisov B. I.; Méndez-Rojas M. A.; Garnovskii A. D.; Ivakhnenko E. P.; Ortiz-Méndez U. J. Coord. Chem. 2002, 55, 745.
[3]
(c) Sun L.; Campbell M. G.; Dinca M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 3566.
[3]
(d) Sato S.; Sakata K.; Hashimoto Y.; Takikawa H.; Suzuki K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 12608.
[3]
(e) Esguerra K. V. N.; Lumb J.-P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1514.
[3]
(f) Zhang R.; Luo S. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29, 1193.
[4]
(a) Magdziak D.; Rodriguez A. A.; Van De Water R. W.; Pettus T. R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 285.
[4]
(b) Lebrasseur N.; Gagnepain J.; Ozanne-Beaudenon A.; Léger J. M.; Quideau S. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6280.
[4]
(c) Wu A.; Duan Y.; Xu D.; Penning T. M.; Harvey R. G. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 2111.
[4]
(d) Uyanik M., Mutsuga T., Ishihara K. Molecules 2012, 17, 8604.
[4]
(e) Usui K.; Yamamoto K.; Shimizu T.; Okazumi M.; Mei B.; Demizu Y.; Kurihara M.; Suemune H. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 6502.
[4]
(f) Mishra A. K.; Moorthy J. N. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 6472.
[4]
(g) Uyanik M.; Mutsuga T.; Ishihara K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3956.
[4]
(h) Pulvirenti L.; Muccilli V.; Cardullo N.; Spatafora C.; Tringali C. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 1648.
[4]
(i) Bizzarri B. M.; Botta L.; Capecchi E.; Celestino I.; Checconi P.; Palamara A. T.; Nencioni L.; Saladino R. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 3247.
[4]
(j) Stack D. E.; Mahmud B. Synth. Commun. 2018, 48, 161.
[5]
(a) Xiao X.; Greenwood N. S.; Wengryniuk S. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 131, 16327.
[5]
(b) Xiao X.; Roth J. M.; Greenwood N. S.; Velopolcek M. K.; Aguirre J.; Jalali M.; Ariafard A.; Wengryniuk S. E. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 6566.
[6]
(a) Weiss R.; Seubert J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1994, 33, 891.
[6]
(b) Zhdankin V. V.; Koposov A. Y.; Yashin N. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5735.
[7]
(a) Zhou B.; Yan T.; Xue, X. S.; Cheng, J. P. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 6128.
[7]
(b) Yan T.; Zhou, B.; Xue, X. S.; Cheng, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 9006.
[7]
(c) Zhou B.; Xue X. S.; Cheng J. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 1287.
[7]
(d) Zhou B.; Haj M. K.; Jacobsen E. N.; Houk K. N.; Xue X. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 15206.
[7]
(e) Zheng H.; Sang Y.; Houk K. N.; Xue X. S.; Cheng J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 16046.
[7]
(f) Yang J.; Li M.; Xue X. S. Chin. J. Chem. 2019, 37, 359.
[7]
(g) Zheng H.; Xue X. S. Curr. Org. Chem. 2020, 4, 1.
[8]
Frisch M. J.; Trucks G. W.; Schlegel H. B.; Scuseria G. E.; Robb M. A.; Cheeseman J. R.; Scalmani G.; Barone V.; Petersson G. A.; Nakatsuji H.; Li X.; Caricato M.; Marenich A. V.; Bloino J.; Janesko B. G.; Gomperts R.; Mennucci B.; Hratchian H. P.; Ortiz J. V.; Izmaylov A. F.; Sonnenberg J. L.; Williams-Young D.; Ding F.; Lipparini F. Egidi F.; Goings J.; Peng B.; Petrone A.; Henderson T.; Ranasinghe D.; Zakrzewski V. G.; Gao J.; Rega N.; Zheng G.; Liang W.; Hada M.; Ehara M.; Toyota K.; Fukuda R.; Hasegawa J.; Ishida M.; Nakajima T.; Honda Y.; Kitao O.; Nakai H.; Vreven T.; Throssell K.; Montgomery Jr., J. A.; Peralta J. E.; Ogliaro F.; Bearpark M. J.; Heyd J. J.; Brothers E. N.; Kudin K. N.; Staroverov V. N.; Keith T. A.; Kobayashi R.; Normand J.; Raghavachari K.; Rendell A. P.; Burant J. C.; Iyengar S. S.; Tomasi J.; Cossi M.; Millam J. M.; Klene M.; Adamo C.; Cammi R.; Ochterski J. W.; Martin R. L.; Morokuma K.; Farkas O.; Foresman J. B.; Fox D. J. Gaussian 16, Revision A.03, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2016.
[9]
Marenich A. V.; Cramer C. J.; Truhlar D. G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 6378.
[10]
Zhao Y.; Truhlar D. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 157.
[11]
Hay P. J.; Wadt W. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 299.
[12]
(a) Weigend F.; Furche F.; Ahlrichs R. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 12753.
[12]
(b) Weigend F.; Ahlrichs R. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3297.
[12]
(c) Jiang H.; Sun T. Y.; Wang X.; Xie Y.; Zhang X.; Wu Y. D.; Schaefer III H. F. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 6502.
[12]
(d) Sun T.; Chen K.; Zhou H.; You T.; Yin P.; Wang X. J. Comput. Chem. 2021, 42, 470.
[13]
Legault C. Y. CYLview, 1.0b, Université de Sherbrooke, 2009;
[14]
The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0.4, Schrödinger, LLC.
[15]
Kaur A.; Ariafard A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 1117.
[16]
(a) Feldman K. S.; Sambandam A.; Bowers K. E.; Appel H. M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5794.
[16]
(b) Mitchell J. S.; Wu Y.; Cook C. J.; Main L. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 268.
[17]
在审稿期间,Ariafard等人在有机化学杂志发表了相关反应的机理研究工作, 该工作得到了与我们工作相似的结论: Jalali M.; Bissember A. C.; Yates B. F..; Wengryniuk S. E.; Ariafard A. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 12237.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉