The Cu…Cu separation is 0.317 nm, suggesting negligible cuprophilic interaction. Each Tbpo linker connects three Cu centers in a
κ1-
κ1-
κ1-
μ3 coordination mode, and the linkage between Tbpo and Cu
2Cl
2 generates a two-dimensional layer with
fes topology (see Supporting information, Figures S1, 2b). Tbpo-Br also crystallizes in the monoclinic space group
P2
1/
c (Table S2), and adopts the same overall coordination connectivity as Tbpo-Cl. The Cu
2Br
2 cluster is bridged by two bromide ions in an analogous
κ1-
κ2-
μ2 manner. The Cu—Br distances range from 0.233 to 0.249 nm, with a torsion angle N…Cu—Br…Cu of 125.5°. The ∠Br(1)-Cu(1)-Br(2) and ∠Cu(1)-Br(2)- Cu(2) are 110.8° and 77.6°, respectively (
Figure 2c). The Cu…Cu distance decreases to 0.305 nm relative to Tbpo- Cl, while the resulting framework still forms a two-dimensional
fes net (see Supporting information, Figures S1, 2d). The Tbpo-I crystallizes in the triclinic space group
Pī (see Supporting information, Table S3). However, the coordination mode of Cu
2I
2 does differ from both of them. Each I atom bridges two Cu(I) centers, forming Cu
2I
2 moieties. And two Cu(I) centers show 3-coordinated and 4-coordinated coordination modes, respectively, where Cu(1) coordinates two I atoms and one Tbpo, Cu(2) coordinates two I atoms and two Tbpo, the double I atoms connect Cu centers in
κ2-
κ2-
μ2 coordination mode (
Figure 2e). The Cu—I ranges from 0.253 to 0.273 nm with torsion angle of N…Cu—I…Cu (118.5°) and ∠I(1)-Cu(1)-I(2) and ∠Cu(1)-I(2)-Cu(2) are 118.5° and 58.9°, respectively. Cu…Cu forms smallest distance 0.259 nm compared with Tbpo-Cl/Br. Similarly, Tbpo-I also displays
fes topology structure (see Supporting information Figure S1,
Figure 2f).