Advances in Covalent Organic Frameworks Design for Proton Conduction

doi:10.6023/A25040135

Acta Chimica Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 83 ›› Issue (11): 1435-1450.DOI: 10.6023/A25040135 Previous Articles Next Articles

Review

共价有机框架的设计及质子传导性能研究进展

班渺寒^a^,^b, 双亚洲^a, 杨安平^a, 郑长勇^b, 张伟^b^,^*(), 徐飞^a^,^*()

^a 西北工业大学材料学院西安 710072
^b 西北化工研究院有限公司陕西省石油精细化学品重点实验室西安 710065

投稿日期:2025-04-28 发布日期:2025-06-09
通讯作者: 张伟, 徐飞

作者简介:

班渺寒, 西北工业大学材料学院在职博士, 西北化工研究院有限公司工程师. 研究方向为质子交换膜燃料电池关键材料的开发.

张伟, 西北化工研究院, 精细化工研究中心主任、教授级高级工程师, 三秦学者. 2009年于中科院大连化物所获理学博士学位. 负责、参加国家863、国家自然科学基金、中科院领域前沿创新、中科院重要方向性、振兴东北重点、中石化科技、中石油技术开发、陕西省重点研发计划等43项. 发表论文63篇, 主持编写标准3件; 申请授权专利57件. 主要从事煤、石油、清洁能源、天然气深加工及含氟精细化学品等领域的应用和基础研究.

徐飞, 西北工业大学材料学院教授、博士生导师、国家基金委优青、洪堡学者. 于2015年在中山大学获得博士学位, 2012~2014年在日本分子科学研究所从事联合培养博士研究, 2018~2020年在德累斯顿工业大学从事洪堡博士后研究. 主要研究方向为功能多孔聚合物和炭材料的创新制备及在新能源等领域的应用.

基金资助:
项目受国家自然科学基金面上项目(52473220); 陕西省重点研发计划(2025CY-YBXM-444)

Advances in Covalent Organic Frameworks Design for Proton Conduction

Ban Miaohan^a^,^b, Shuang Yazhou^a, Yang Anping^a, Zheng Changyong^b, Zhang Wei^b^,^*(), Xu Fei^a^,^*()

^a School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’An 710072, China
^b The Northwest Research Institute of Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Petroleum for Fine Chemicals, Xi’an 710065, China

Received:2025-04-28 Published:2025-06-09
Contact: Zhang Wei, Xu Fei
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52473220); Shaanxi Provincial Key Research and Development Program(2025CY-YBXM-444)

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have emerged as a revolutionary technology in the field of clean energy, enabling the direct conversion of chemical energy to electricity through hydrogen-oxygen electrochemical reactions. This technology fundamentally circumvents the limitations of conventional combustion-based power generation, achieving near-zero greenhouse gas emissions while presenting a critical solution for efficient and environmentally-benign utilization of chemical energy. As the critical component of PEMFCs, the proton exchange membrane (PEM) plays an essential role in determining device-level efficiency and long-term operational stability. The PEM is a proton conductive polymer membrane existing between the anode and cathode, enabling selective proton transport while blocking electrons and gases. The ideal PEM materials must concurrently satisfy two critical operational requirements: (1) establishing efficient proton conduction pathways from anode to cathode with directional specificity, while (2) exhibiting robust resistance to gas and electricity leakage. To address these competing demands, strategic innovations in nanostructured membrane architectures continue to drive progress in next-generation PEMs. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs), a novel class of porous organic crystalline materials, demonstrate exceptional potential as next-generation PEM candidates owing to their inherent advantages including precise structural tunability, periodic pore arrangements, customizable functionality, and remarkable chemical stability. The unique architectural features of COFs provide unprecedented opportunities for proton conduction engineering. Their molecular-designed frameworks allow precise engineering of proton-conductive sites through strategic chemical modifications, while the well-defined nanochannels enable effective confinement of diverse proton carriers/vehicles. The periodic and topological pore nanoarchitectures facilitate the establishment of hierarchical proton transport pathways. These characteristics demonstrate exceptional performances in either hydrated or anhydrous proton conduction systems. This review systematically examines recent advancements in the design and preparation of COF-based proton conducting materials. Beginning with a brief introduction to the PEMFCs and current PEM, the basic knowledge of COFs and their potential structural advantages for proton conduction are discussed. Subsequently, the preparation of COF-based membrane and the key performance evaluation of PEM are summarized. Particular emphasis is placed on design strategies to enhance proton conduction including: (1) Framework design with incorporation of proton-conducting functionalities, (2) Pore nanoconfinement of proton-conducting guest moieties and (3) Pore-structure engineering for building proton conducting superhighways. The proton conductivity under different temperatures and humidities are discussed, along with the correlations to their structures and proton conduction mechanisms. Finally, the summary and perspective in this field are presented, underscoring challenges and opportunities in this burgeoning field. We hope this review would offer valuable insights into designing high-performance COF-based PEMs.

Key words: covalent organic frameworks, proton conduction, framework functionalization, pore nanoconfinement, pore-structure engineering

Cite this article

Ban Miaohan, Shuang Yazhou, Yang Anping, Zheng Changyong, Zhang Wei, Xu Fei. Advances in Covalent Organic Frameworks Design for Proton Conduction[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2025, 83(11): 1435-1450.

Export EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

share this article

Fig. & Tab. 19

Figure 1. (a) Scheme of the fuel cell; (b~d) Classification of the proton conducting structure of the membrane

Figure 2. Scheme of COF structure design for proton conduction: (a) framework functionality and pore structure design and (b) pore confinement of proton carriers

Figure 3. Membrane prepared by (a) direct solid-phase compaction method, (b) interfacial polymerization method, and (c) solvent casting method

Figure 5. (a) Schematic illustration of the bottom-up synthesis of IPC-COF nanosheets and the chemical structure of NUS-9; (b) Schematic illustration of IPC-COF membrane assembly and pore structures; (c) Proton conductivity of IPC-COF membrane and Nafion 212 versus RH at 40 ℃; (d) Schematic illustration of ion transport channels changes with decreased RH for different types PEMs[38]. Copyright © 2020 Wiley- VCH GmbH

Figure 7. (a) Chemical structure evolution of the asymmetric hydrophosphonylation of TFPPY-BT-COF-H2PO3; (b) Nyquist plots of TFPPY- BT-COF-H2PO3 measured with H2O and D2O (313 K, 98% RH); (c) Illustration for the proposed proton conduction mechanism of TFPPY- BT-COF-H2PO3[55]. Copyright © 2022, American Chemical Society

Figure 8. (a) The molecule simulation of the iCOF topological structure; (b) Scheme of the -SO3H group distance in iCOFs skeleton; (c) Temperature dependent proton conductivities of the membranes under RH=100%; (d) Proton transfer mechanism in iCOFMs, schematics of a shuttle and a transfer, and the number of proton hopping as a function of the simulation time; (e) Facile proton dissociation behavior; (f) proton transfer in and between hydronium domain; (g) The probability density distribution of H3O+ in TpBd-SO3H and TpPa-SO3H[56]

Figure 9. (a) Schematic representation of synthesis of Tp-Azo and Tp-Stb; (b) Schematic representation of H3PO4 doping in COFs; (c) Crystal structure of 4-[(E)-phenyl-diazenyl]anilinium dihydrogen phosphate; (d) Proton conductivity of PA@Tp-Azo in anhydrous condition[67]

Figure 10. (a) A bottom-up strategy for the synthesis of COF-Fx (x=6, 8, 10); (b) Scheme of COF-F6-H and COF-42-H with 42% (w) H3PO4 loading under anhydrous conditions; (c) PXRD patterns of COF-F6 and COF-42 before and after H3PO4 soaking treatments; (d) 2D 1H/1D spectra for COF-F6-H; (e) Long-period test for COF-F6-H[69]. Copyright © 2020, American Chemical Society

Figure 11. (a) Illustration of the synthetic route of NKCOFs; (b) Fuel cell polarization curves and power density curves of H3PO4@NKCOF-1 measured at 60 ℃ using single H2/O2 cell assembly under 100% RH; (c) Cyclic stability of OCV and power density of H3PO4@NKCOF-1[60]. Copyright © 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

Figure 12. (a) Reconstructed one pore structures of HFPTP-PDA-COF, HFPTP-BPDA-COF, Py-2,2-BPyPh-COF, TPB-DMTP-COF, and Py-TMQPDA-COF; (b) Anhydrous proton conductivity of H3PO4@COFs at different temperatures; (c) Anhydrous proton conductivity of H3PO4@COFs at 160 ℃; (d) Activation energy barriers of H3PO4@COFs[72]. Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Angewandte Chemie International Edition published by Wiley-VCH GmbH

Figure 13. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of hierarchical macro-microporous m-TpPa-SO3H; (b, c) The SEM images and TEM image of hierarchical m-TpPa-SO3H; (d) Temperature dependence of the proton conductivities of m-TpPa-SO3H, PIL0.2@m-TpPa-SO3H, PIL0.5@m-TpPa-SO3H, and PIL0.2@s-COF; (e) Long-term proton conductivity durability of PIL0.5@m-TpPa-SO3H at 90 ℃ under RH=100%; (f) Schematic illustration of proton conduction mechanism of PIL0.5@m-TpPa-SO3H under RH=100%[73]. Copyright © 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH

Figure 14. (a) The structure of COF-1, COF-2 and COF-3 with similar pore diameters but different amounts of hydrophilic groups; (b, c) 2D 1H DQ/SQ NMR spectrum of COF-3; (d) Proton conduction pathway schematic illustration in 1D and 3D direction; (e) The temperature-dependent proton conductivity of COF-3@PA-30[31]. Copyright © 2023, Tsinghua University Press

Figure 15. (a) Illustration for the synthesis of NUST-28; (b) The hydrogen bonding between NUST-28 and H3PO4; (c) Long-term proton conduction of NUST-28-60%[64]

Figure 16. (a) Schematic representation of MEA making using pelletized COF powder: (1) Preparation of Pt coated GDL (as anode and cathode), COF pellet (as solid electrolyte), (2~4) Sandwiching of COF pellet between two electrodes, (5~7) Assembly of the MEA into a single cell stack; (b) Lifetime OCV measurement obtained using PA@TpBpy-ST and PA@TpBpy-MC as solid electrolytes in PEMFC; (c) Fuel cell polarization plot obtained at 50 ℃ using dry H2, Pt, C/COF pellet/Pt, C, dry O2 electrochemical cell[47]

Figure 17. (a) Schematic of the synthesis of EB-COF:Br; (b) Nitrogen sorption isotherms for EB-COF:Br and EB-COF:PW12; (c) Schematic of PW12O403- doping in COF; (d) Proton conductivity of EB-COF:Br and (e) EB-COF:PW12 in RH=97% condition[77]. Copyright © 2016, American Chemical Society

COFs	Sources of conductivity	Proton conductivity/(S•cm⁻¹)	T/℃	RH/%
TFPPY-BT-COF-H₂PO₃^[65]	H₃PO₄	1.12×10⁻³	60	98
NUST-28^[74]	H₃PO₄	1.46×10⁻¹	120	0
COF-3@PA-30^[31]	H₃PO₄	1.4	160	0
H₃PO₄@TPB-DMeTPCOF^[68]	H₃PO₄	1.91×10⁻¹	160	0
COF-F6-H^[69]	H₃PO₄	4.2×10⁻²	140	0
H₃PO₄@Tp-Azo-COF^[67]	H₃PO₄	6.70×10⁻⁵	67	0
H₃PO₄@NKCOFs^[70]	H₃PO₄	1.13×10⁻¹	80	98
H₃PO₄@TpBpy-MC^[47]	H₃PO₄	2.50×10⁻³	120	0
Phytic acid@TpPa- (SO₃H-Py)^[75]	Phytic acid	5.00×10⁻⁴	120	0
PTSA@TpAzo^[43]	p-Toluenesulfonic acid	7.8×10⁻²	80	95
EB-COF:PW₁₂^[77]	polyoxometalates	3.32×10⁻³	20	97
trz@TPB-DMTP-COF^[58]	Triazole	1.1×10⁻³	130	0

Table 1. The proton conduction properties of COFs materials loaded with different sources

Figure 18. Proton conductivities of COFs with modified skeletal functional groups and confining exogenous molecules under different temperatures and relative humidity

References 81

[1]	Islam A.; Islam T.; Mahmud H.; Raihan O.; Islam M. S.; Marwani H. M.; Raham M. M.; Asiri A. M.; Hasan M. M.; Hasan M. M.; Salman M. S.; Kubra K. T.; Shenashen M. A.; Sheikh M. C.; Awual M. R. Int. J. Hydrog. Energ.. 2024, 67, 458.
[2]	Ahmad S.; Nawaz T.; Ali A.; Orhan M. F.; Samreen A.; Kannan A. M. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2022, 47, 19086.
[3]	Mauritz K. A.; Moore R. B. Chem. Re.. 2004, 104, 4535.
[4]	Atanasov V.; Lee A. S.; Park E. J.; Maurya S.; Baca E. D.; Fujimoto C.; Hibbs M.; Matanovic I.; Kerres J.; Kim Y. S. Nat. Mate.. 2021, 20, 370.
[5]	Lee K.-S.; Spendelow J. S.; Choe Y.-K.; Fujimoto C.; Kim Y. S. Nat. Energ.. 2016, 1, 16120.
[6]	Xu F.; Yang S.; Chen X.; Liu Q.; Li H.; Wang H.; Wei B.; Jiang D. Chem. Sc.. 2019, 10, 6001.
[7]	Shuang Y.; Zhang R.; Wang H.; Li L.; Hao X.; Ma Z.; Wang S.; Wang J.; Wang F.; Yang X.; Guo P.; Xu F.; Wang H.; Ye Q.; Liu W.; Jian J.; Wang H. Adv. Mater. 2025, DOI: 10.1002/adma.202500468
[8]	Diercks C. S.; Yaghi O. M. Science. 2017, 355, 1585.
[9]	Liu R. Y.; Tan K. T.; Gong Y.; Chen Y.; Li Z.; Xie S.; He T.; Lu Z.; Yang H.; Jiang D.-L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 120.
[10]	Dey K.; Mohata S.; Banerjee R; ACS Nan. 2021, 15, 12723.
[11]	Yan S.-R.; Liu W.-H.; Duan F.; Chen M.-Q.; Dong W.-F.; Lu S.-L.; Du M.-L. Acta Chim. Sinica. doi: 10.6023/A25030077) (in Chinese)
	(闫生荣, 刘文浩, 段芳, 陈明清, 东为富, 陆双龙, 杜明亮, 化学学报,doi: 10.6023/A25030077)
[12]	Xie Z.; Chen X.; Wang W.; Ke X.; Zhang X.; Wang S.; Wu X.; Yu J. C.; Wang X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202410179.
[13]	Qian Z.; Wang Z. J.; Zhang K. A. I. Chem. Mate.. 2021, 33, 1909.
[14]	Li C.; Xu H.; Xiong H.; Xia S.; Peng X.; Xu F.; Chen X. Adv. Funct. Mate.. 2024, 34, 2405539.
[15]	Tan D.; Zhuang R.; Chen R.; Ban M.; Feng W.; Xu F.; Chen X.; Wang Q. Adv. Funct. Mate.. 2024, 34, 2311655.
[16]	Yu H.; Zhang X.; Chen Q.; Zhou P.-K.; Xu F.; Wang H.; Chen X. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40242- 024-4213-3
[17]	Wu J.; Xu F.; Li S.; Ma P.; Zhang X.; Liu Q.; Fu R.; Wu D. Adv. Mater. 2018, 31, e1802922.
[18]	Liu Y.; Liu X.; Su A.; Gong C.; Chen S.; Xia L.; Zhang C.; Tao X.; Li Y.; Li Y.; Sun T.; Bu M.; Shao W.; Zhao J.; Li X.; Peng Y.; Guo P.; Han Y.; Zhu Y.-H. Chem. Soc. Re.. 2024, 53, 502.
[19]	Xia C.; Kirlikovali K.-O.; Nguyen T. H.; Nguyen X. C.; Tran Q. B.; Duong M. K.; Nguyen Dinh M. T.; Nguyen D. L. T.; Singh P.; Raizada P.; Nguyen V.-H.; Kim S. Y.; Singh L.; Nguyen C. C.; Shokouhimehr M.; Le Q. V. Coord. Chem. Re.. 2021, 446, 214117.
[20]	Zhuang R.; Cai X.; Qu C.; He S.; Kaskel S.; Shenouda A. Y.; Wang H.; Xu F. Carbon. 2024, 221, 118862.
[21]	Li Z.; Zhuang R.; Xu W.; Ban M.; Xu F. J. Funct. Polym. 2024, 37, 356 (in Chinese).
	(李昭能, 庄容, 许玮航, 班渺寒, 徐飞, 功能高分子学报, 2024, 37, 356.)
[22]	Tan D.; Zhang X.; Hao S.; Ban M.; Xu F. J. Funct. Polym. 2024, 37, 451 (in Chinese).
	(谭德明, 张馨壬, 郝爽爽, 班渺寒, 徐飞, 功能高分子学报, 2024, 37, 451.)
[23]	CôTé A. P.; Benin A. I.; Ockwig N. W.; O'Keeffe M.; Matzger A. J.; Yaghi O. M. Scienc. 2005, 310, 1166.
[24]	Zhang W.; Li J.; Li H.; Ji J.; Gong C.; Ding S. Prog. Chem. 2024, 36, 48 (in Chinese).
	(张炜煜, 李杰, 李红, 姬佳奇, 宫琛亮, 丁三元, 化学进展, 2024, 36, 48.)
[25]	Zhang Q.; Dong S.; Shao P.; Zhu Y.; Mu Z.; Sheng D.; Zhang T.; Jiang X.; Shao R.; Ren Z.; Xie J.; Feng X.; Wang B. Scienc. 2022, 378, 181.
[26]	Kreuer S.; Kandambeth S.; Biswal B. P.; Sasmal H. S.; Kumar S.; Pachfule P.; Banerjee R. J. Am. Chem. So.. 2017, 139, 1856.
[27]	Shi Z.; Guo Y.; Zou X.; Zhang J.; Chen Z.; Shan M.; Zhang Z.; Guo S.; Yan F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202420619.
[28]	Zhu R.-M.; Fu J.-X.; Chen L.-H.; Gu Z.-G. Mater. Chem. Fron.. 2023, 7, 5932.
[29]	Li Q.; Gao H.; Zhao Y.; Zhou B.; Yu L.; Huang Q.; Jiang L.; Gao J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202402094.
[30]	Yang J.; Xu H.; Li J.; Gong K.; Yue F.; Han X.; Wu K.; Shao P.; Fu Q.; Zhu Y.; Xu W.; Huang X.; Xie J.; Wang F.; Yang W.; Zhang T.; Xu Z.; Feng X.; Wang B. Scienc. 2024, 385, 1115.
[31]	Yang Q.; Li X.; Xie C.; Liu N.; Yang J.; Kong Z.; Kang Z.; Wang R.; Li X.; Sun D. Nano Re.. 2023, 16, 10946.
[32]	Campbell N. L. Clowes R.; Ritchie L. K.; Cooper A. I. Chem. Mate.. 2009, 21, 204.
[33]	Peng Y.; Xu G.; Hu Z.; Cheng Y.; Chi C.; Yuan D.; Cheng H. Zhao D. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface. 2016, 8, 18505.
[34]	Wan S.; Guo J.; Kim. J.; Ihee H.; Jiang D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8826.
[35]	Yang C.-X.; Liu C.; Cao Y.-M.; Yan X.-P. ChemCom. 2015, 51, 12254.
[36]	Liu L.; Yin L.; Cheng D.; Zhao S.; Zhang, H -Y.; Zhang N.; Zhu G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 14875.
[37]	Yang J.; Wang B.; Feng X. Acc. Chem. Res. 2025, 58, 1447.
[38]	Cao L.; Wu H.; Cao Y.; Fan C.; Zhao R.; He X.; Yang P.; Shi B.; You X.; Jiang Z. Adv Mate.. 2020, 32, e2005565.
[39]	Dey K.; Pal M.; Rout K.; C. Kunjattu H. S.; Das A.; Mukherjee R.; Kharul U. K.; Banerjee R. J. Am. Chem. So.. 2017, 139, 13083.
[40]	Huang T.; Jiang H.; Douglin J. C.; Chen Y.; Yin S.; Zhang J.; Deng X.; Wu H.; Yin Y.; Dekel D. R;. Guiver M. D.; Jiang Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202209306.
[41]	Liu L.; Ma Y.; Li B.; Yin L.; Zang H. Y.; Zhang N.; Bi H.; Wang S.; Zhu G. Smal.. 2024, 20, e2308499.
[42]	Paul D. K.; McCreery R.; Karan K. J Electrochem Soc. 2014, 161, F1395.
[43]	Sasmal H. S.; Aiyappa H. B.; Bhange S. N.; Karak S.; Halder A.; Kurungot S.; Banerjee R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 10894.
[44]	Yang Y.; Zhang P.; Hao L.; Cheng P.; Chen Y.; Zhang Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 21838.
[45]	Kreuer K.-D.; Paddison S. J.; Spohr E.; Schuster M. Chem. Re.. 2004, 104, 4637.
[46]	Maiti T. K.; Singh J.; Majhi J.; Ahuja A.; Maiti S.; Dixit P.; Bhushan S.; Bandyopadhyay A.; Chattopadhyay S. Polyme.. 2022, 255, 125151.
[47]	Shinde D. B.; Aiyappa H. B.; Bhadra M.; Biswal B. P.; Wadge P.; Kandambeth S.; Garai B.; Kundu T.; Kurungot S.; Banerjee R. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016, 4, 2682.
[48]	Vengatesan S.; Panha K.; Fowler M. W.; Yuan X.-Z.; Wang H. J. Power Source. 2012, 207, 101.
[49]	Lim C.; Ghassemzadeh L.; Van Hove F.; Lauritzen M.; Kolodziej J.; Wang G. G.; Holdcroft S.; Kjeang E. J. Power Source. 2014, 257, 102.
[50]	Touhami S.; Crouillere M.; Mainka J.; Dillet J.; Nayoze-Coynel C.; Bas C.; Dubau L.; El Kaddouri A.; Dubelley F.; Micoud F.; Chatenet M.; Bultel Y.; Lottin O. J. Power Source. 2022, 520, 230880.
[51]	Ngo P. M.; Karimata T.; Saitou T.; Ito K. J. Power Source. 2023, 556, 232446.
[52]	Phang W. J.; Jo H.; Lee W. R.; Song J. H.; Yoo K.; Kim B.; Hong C. S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 5142.
[53]	Yao J.; Xu G.-X.; Zhao Z.; Guo J.; Li S.; Cai W.; Zhang S. Int. J. Hydrogen Ener.. 2019, 44, 24985.
[54]	Xu F.; Wang Y.; Lian C.; Xu Z. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 648, 120361.
[55]	Guo Y.; Zou X.; Li W.; Hu Y.; Jin Z.; Sun Z.; Gong S.; Guo S.; Yan F. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 6499.
[56]	Joos M.; Kang X.; Merkle R.; Maier J. Nat. Mater. 2025, 24, 821.
[57]	Shin D. W.; Guiver M. D.; Lee Y. M. Chem. Re.. 2017, 117, 4759.
[58]	Xu H.; Tao S.; Jiang D. Nat. Mate.. 2016, 15, 722.
[59]	Hurd J. A.; Vaidhyanathan R.; Thangadurai V.; Ratcliffe C. I.; Moudrakovski I. L.; Shimizu G. K. Nat. Che.. 2009, 1, 705.
[60]	Liu S.; Li H.; Shuai Y.; Ding Z.; Liu Y. Mater. Ad.. 2022, 3, 8647.
[61]	Ranjeesh K. C.; Illathvalappil R.; Veer S. D.; Peter J.; Wakchaure V. C.; Goudappagouda; Raj K. V.; Kurungot S.; Babu S. S. J. Am. Chem. So.. 2019, 141, 14950.
[62]	Yang S.; Yang C.; Dun C.; Mao H.; Khoo R. S. H.; Klivansky L. M.; Reimer J. A.; Urban J. J.; Zhang J.; Liu Y. J. Am. Chem. So.. 2022, 144, 9827.
[63]	Vilciauskas L.; Tuckerman M. E.; Bester G.; Paddison S. J.; Kreuer K. D. Nat. Che.. 2012, 4, 461.
[64]	Wang S.; Tang X.; Yang K.; Chen B.; Zhang K.; Xu H.; Wang W.; Zhang G.; Gu C. Macromol. Rapid Commu.. 2023, 44, e2200678.
[65]	Lu Z.; Yang C.; He L.; Hong J.; Huang C.; Wu T.; Wang X.; Wu Z.; Liu X.; Miao Z.; Zeng B.; Xu Y.; Yuan C.; Dai L. J. Am. Chem. So.. 2022, 144, 9624.
[66]	Shi B.; Pang X.; Li S.; Wu H.; Shen J.; Wang X.; Fan C.; Cao L.; Zhu T.; Qiu M.; Yin Z.; Kong Y.; Liu Y.; Zhang M.; Liu Y.; Pan F.; Jiang Z. Nat. Commu.. 2022, 13, 6666.
[67]	Chandra S.; Kundu T.; Kandambeth S.; Babarao R.; Marathe Y.; Kunjir S. M.; Banerjee R. J. Am. Chem. So.. 2014, 136, 6570.
[68]	Tao S.; Zhai L.; Dinga Wonanke A. D.; Addicoat M. A.; Jiang Q.; Jiang D. Nat. Commu.. 2020, 11, 1981.
[69]	Wu X.; Hong Y.; Xu B.; Nishiyama Y.; Jiang W.; Zhu J.; Zhang G.; Kitagawa S.; Horike S. J. Am. Chem. So.. 2020, 142, 14357.
[70]	Yang Y.; He X.; Zhang P.; Andaloussi Y. H.; Zhang H.; Jiang Z.; Chen Y.; Ma S.; Cheng P.; Zhang Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 3678.
[71]	Im Y. K.; Lee D. G.; Noh H. J.; Yu S. Y.; Mahmood J.; Lee S. Y.; Baek J. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202203250.
[72]	Tao S.; Jiang D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202408296.
[73]	Zou W.; Jiang G.; Zhang W.; Zhang L.; Cui Z.; Song H.; Liang Z.; Du L. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2213642.
[74]	Pan Y.; Shan Z.; Liu Z.; Su J.; Zhang G. CrystEngCom. 2025, 27, 111.
[75]	Chandra S.; Kundu T.; Dey K.; Addicoat M.; Heine T.; Banerjee R. Chem. Mate.. 2016, 28, 1489.
[76]	Gomes A. D. S.; Dutra Filho J. C. Int. J. Hydrogen Ener.. 2012, 37, 6246.
[77]	Ma H.; Liu B.; Li B.; Zhang L.; Li Y. G.; Tan H. Q.; Zang H. Y.; Zhu G. J. Am. Chem. So.. 2016, 138, 5897.
[78]	Ren X.-Y.; Song J.-B.; Zhang G.-Q.; Kong Y.-R.; Zhang H.; Qiao Q.; Luo H.-B.; Zhang J.; Liu J.-L.; Ren X.-M. ACS Mater. Let.. 2024, 6, 4036.
[79]	Yin Y.; Li Z.; Yang X.; Cao L.; Wang C.; Zhang B.; Wu H.; Jiang Z. J. Power Source. 2016, 332, 265.
[80]	Zhang L.; Gao Z.; Kong Y.; Xing N.; Pang X.; Liu Z.; Yao Z.; Zhu S.; Wu H.; Jiang Z. J. Membr. Sci. 2024, 708, 123088.
[81]	Zhou B.-L.; Chen L. Acta Chim. Sinic. 2015, 73, 487 (in Chinese).
	(周宝龙, 陈龙, 化学学报, 2015, 73, 487.)

共价有机框架的设计及质子传导性能研究进展

Advances in Covalent Organic Frameworks Design for Proton Conduction

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Fig. & Tab. 19

References 81

Related Articles 14

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Shengrong Yan, Wenhao Liu, Fang Duan, Mingqing Chen, Weifu Dong, Shuanglong Lu, Mingliang Du. Constructing of sp²-Carbon Linked Covalent Organic Frameworks with D-A Structure and Evaluating Their Photocatalytic Performance towards Hydrogen Peroxide Production [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2025, 83(7): 685-693.
[2]	Jianchuan Liu, Cuiyan Li, Yaozu Liu, Yujie Wang, Qianrong Fang. Highly-Stable Two-Dimensional Bicarbazole-based sp²-Carbon-conjugated Covalent Organic Framework for Efficient Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction^★ [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2023, 81(8): 884-890.
[3]	Junchang Chen, Mingxing Zhang, Shuao Wang. Research Progress of Synthesis Methods for Crystalline Porous Materials [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2023, 81(2): 146-157.
[4]	Ruilin Haotian, Ziyu Zhu, Yanhui Cai, Wei Wang, Zhen Wang, Axin Liang, Aiqin Luo. Application of Covalent Organic Framework-Based Electrochemical Biosensors in Biological Sample Detection [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2022, 80(11): 1524-1535.
[5]	Xiaohan Yu, Wei Huang, Yanguang Li. Controllable Synthesis and Photocatalytic Applications of Two-dimensional Covalent Organic Frameworks [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2022, 80(11): 1494-1506.
[6]	Zitao Wang, Yaozu Liu, Yujie Wang, Qianrong Fang. A New Covalent Organic Framework Modified with Sulfonic Acid for CO₂ Uptake and Selective Dye Adsorption [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2022, 80(1): 37-43.
[7]	Wang Youfu, Liu Hanghai, Zhu Xinyuan. Mechanically Interlocked Structures within Reticular Frameworks [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2020, 78(8): 746-757.
[8]	Mei Pei, Zhang Yuanyuan, Feng Xiao. Amino Acid Functionalized Crystalline Porous Polymers [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2020, 78(10): 1041-1053.
[9]	Wang Zhitao, Li Hui, Yan Shichen, Fang Qianrong. Synthesis of a Two-dimensional Covalent Organic Framework with the Ability of Conducting Proton along Skeleton [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2020, 78(1): 63-68.
[10]	Peng Zhengkang, Ding Huimin, Chen Rufan, Gao Chao, Wang Cheng. Research Progress in Covalent Organic Frameworks for Energy Storage and Conversion [J]. Acta Chim. Sinica, 2019, 77(8): 681-689.
[11]	Yang Tao, Cui Yanan, Chen Huaiyin, Li Weihua. Controllable Preparation of Two Dimensional Metal- or Covalent Organic Frameworks for Chemical Sensing and Biosensing [J]. Acta Chim. Sinica, 2017, 75(4): 339-350.
[12]	Li Shaozhou, Huang Xiao, Zhang Hua . Preparation and Applications of Two-Dimensional Crystals Based on Organic or Metal-Organic Materials [J]. Acta Chim. Sinica, 2015, 73(9): 913-923.
[13]	Wan Gang, Fu Yu'ang, Guo Jianing, Xiang Zhonghua. Photoelectronic Porous Covalent Organic Materials: Research Progress and Perspective [J]. Acta Chim. Sinica, 2015, 73(6): 557-578.
[14]	. Proton Conduction in La0.9M0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3－α at Intermediate Temperature and Its Application to Synthesis of Ammonia at Atmospheric Pressure [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2009, 67(7): 623-628.