研究论文

愈创木薁衍生物的设计合成及其抗氧化、抗炎活性研究

  • 李蕾 ,
  • 朱聪聪 ,
  • 朱全刚 ,
  • 陈中建 ,
  • 高希珂
展开
  • a 上海师范大学化学与材料科学学院 上海 200234
    b 中国科学院上海有机化学研究所 中国科学院有机功能分子合成与组装化学重点实验室 上海 200032
    c 上海市皮肤病医院 上海 200443
    d 上海中药外用制剂创新工程技术研究中心 上海 200443

收稿日期: 2022-04-11

  修回日期: 2022-05-19

  网络出版日期: 2022-06-09

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(22075310); 上海市科学技术委员会(19XD1424700); 上海市科学技术委员会(20DZ2255200)

Design, Synthesis and Bioactivity Evaluation of Guaiazulene Derivatives with Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Activities

  • Lei Li ,
  • Congcong Zhu ,
  • Quangang Zhu ,
  • Zhongjian Chen ,
  • Xike Gao
Expand
  • a College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234
    b Key Laboratory of Synthetic and Self-Assembly Chemistry for Organic Functional Molecules, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032
    c Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Shanghai 200443
    d Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Topical Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200443
* Corresponding authors. E-mail: ;

Received date: 2022-04-11

  Revised date: 2022-05-19

  Online published: 2022-06-09

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(22075310); Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality(19XD1424700); Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality(20DZ2255200)

摘要

动植物来源的愈创木薁(GA)具有抗菌、抗氧化、抗炎、抗过敏和低毒等特点, 其水溶性衍生物愈创木薁磺酸钠(GAS-Na)同样具有抗炎、促进上皮细胞生长和促进伤口愈合的作用. 然而, 商品化活性分子GAGAS-Na对光、热等稳定性较差. 为了探索具有更高活性和稳定性的愈创木薁类生物功能分子, 合成了2,2'-二愈创木薁(BGA)和[2,2'-二愈创木薁]-1,1'-二磺酸钠(BGAS-Na), 并以GAGAS-Na为对照, 评价了四个化合物的抗氧化能力, 研究了其对脂多糖(LPS)诱导小鼠巨噬细胞RAW 264.7的NO释放及细胞存活率的影响. 结果表明, BGABGAS-Na具有良好的抗氧化能力, 且稳定性较GAGAS-Na有所提升; BGAS-Na在抗炎活性测试中具有最优的NO抑制率(IC50值为5.64 μg/mL), 优于商品化分子GAS-Na, 且该抑制作用具有浓度依赖性. 此外, 四种化合物均不影响巨噬细胞的生长, 具有较低的细胞毒性. 因此, BGAS-Na有望成为具有发展潜力的抗炎药物.

本文引用格式

李蕾 , 朱聪聪 , 朱全刚 , 陈中建 , 高希珂 . 愈创木薁衍生物的设计合成及其抗氧化、抗炎活性研究[J]. 有机化学, 2022 , 42(9) : 2906 -2913 . DOI: 10.6023/cjoc202204025

Abstract

Animal and plant-derived guaiazulene (GA) has the characteristics of antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic and low toxicity. Sodium guaiazulene sulfonate (GAS-Na), a water-soluble derivative of GA, also has the effects of anti-inflammatory, promoting epithelial cell growth and wound healing. However, the commercial active molecules GA and GAS-Na have poor stability to light and heat. Therefore, in order to explore the guaiazulene biomedical functional molecules with higher activity and stability, 2,2'-biguaiazulene (BGA) and (2,2'-biguaiazulene)-1,1'-disulfonic acid sodium (BGAS-Na) were synthesized. Compared with GA and GAS-Na, the antioxidant activities of BGA and BGAS-Na were evaluated, and their biological effects on NO release and cell viability of LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages were studied. The results showed that BGA and BGAS-Na had better antioxidant capacity and improved stability compared with GA and GAS-Na; BGAS-Na had the best NO inhibition rate in the anti-inflammatory activity test (the IC50 value was 5.64 μg/ mL), which was better than that of the commercial molecule GAS-Na, and the inhibitory effect was dose-dependent. In addition, the four compounds did not affect the growth of macrophages and had low cytotoxicity. Therefore, BGAS-Na is expected to become a potential anti-inflammatory drug.

参考文献

[1]
(a) Gao, H.-L.; Yang, X.-D.; Xin, H.-S.; Gao, T.-Z.; Gong, H.-G.; Gao, X.-K. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 38, 2680. (in Chinese)
[1]
(高洪磊, 杨笑迪, 辛涵申, 高铁阵, 龚和贵, 高希珂, 有机化学, 2018, 38, 2680.)
[1]
(b) Hou, B.; Li, J.; Xin, H.; Yang, X.; Gao, H.; Peng, P.-Z.; Gao, X.-K. Acta Chim. Sinica 2020, 78, 788. (in Chinese)
[1]
(侯斌, 李晶, 辛涵申, 杨笑迪, 高洪磊, 彭培珍, 高希珂, 化学学报, 2020, 78, 788.)
[2]
(a) Fusetani, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Konosu, S. Experientia 1981, 37, 680.
[2]
(b) Seo, Y.; Rho, J.-R.; Geum, N.; Yoon, J. B.; Shin, J. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 985.
[3]
(a) Yamasaki, H.; Irino, S.; ocirc; zo; Uda, A.; Uchida, K.; Ohno, H.; Saito, N.; Kondo, K.; Jinzenji, K.; Yamamoto, T. Folia Pharmacol. Jpn. 1958, 54, 362.
[3]
(b) Yamasakl, H.; Kondo, K.; Uda, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Endo, K. Folia Pharmacol. Jpn. 1960, 56, 1249.
[4]
Pratsinis, H.; Haroutounian, S. Nat. Prod. Lett. 2002, 16, 201.
[5]
Wang, D.-L.; Dong, Z.; Xu, J.; Li, D. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 33, 1559. (in Chinese)
[5]
(王道林, 董哲, 徐姣, 李帝, 有机化学, 2013, 33, 1559.)
[6]
Cao, T.; Li, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yuan, M.; Li, Y.; Yang, H.; Feng, Y.; Yin, S. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2016, 88, 264.
[7]
(a) Wada, T.; Maruyama, R.; Irie, Y.; Hashimoto, M.; Wakabayashi, H.; Okudaira, N.; Uesawa, Y.; Kagaya, H.; Sakagami, H. In Vivo 2018, 32, 479.
[7]
(b) Uehara, M.; Minemura, H.; Ohno, T.; Hashimoto, M.; Wakabayashi, H.; Okudaira, N.; Sakagami, H. In Vivo 2018, 32, 541.
[7]
(c) Ayaz, F.; Yuzer, A.; Ince, T.; Ince, M. Inflammation 2020, 43, 1009.
[8]
(a) Yanagisawa, T.; Kosakai, K.; Tomiyama, T.; Yasunami, M.; Takase, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 1990, 38, 3355.
[8]
(b) Zhao, Y.-T.; Cai, C.-M.; Yang, S.-Z. Med. Inf. 2020, 33, 51. (in Chinese)
[8]
(赵亚婷, 蔡春梅, 杨树忠, 医学信息, 2020, 33, 51.)
[8]
(c) Guarrera, M.; Turbino, L.; Rebora, A. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2001, 15, 481.
[9]
Wei, Q.; Su, Y.; Xin, H.; Zhang, L.; Ding, J.; Chen, X. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2021, 13, 56719.
[10]
(a) Chen, J.; Duan, W.; Bai, R.; Yao, H.; Shang, J.; Xu, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 3407.
[10]
(b) Chen, J.; Wang, R.; Wang, T.; Ding, Q.; Khalil, A.; Xu, S.; Lin, A.; Yao, H.; Xie, W.; Zhu, Z.; Xu, J. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 443.
[11]
(a) Posner, G. H.; Ploypradith, P.; Parker, M. H.; O'Dowd, H.; Woo, S.-H.; Northrop, J.; Krasavin, M.; Dolan, P.; Kensler, T. W.; Xie, S.; Shapiro, T. A. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4275.
[11]
(b) Fröhlich, T.; Çapcı Karagöz, A.; Reiter, C.; Tsogoeva, S. B. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 7360.
[12]
Andersen, F. A. Int. J. Toxicol. 1999, 18, 27.
[13]
Utsumi, N.; Wang, Y.; Sato, S.; Yamaguchi, Y. Jpn. J. Oral Biol. 1975, 17, 311.
[14]
Shimizu, H.; Hayashida, S.; Wagatsuma, N. Yakugaku Zasshi 1988, 108, 1203.
[15]
(a) Matsubara, Y.; Takekuma, S.-I.; Yokoi, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Nozoe, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1987, 60, 1415.
[15]
(b) Nozoe, T.; Takekuma, S.-I.; Doi, M.; Matsubara, Y.; Yamamoto, H. Chem. Lett. 1984, 13, 627.
[16]
Narita, M.; Murafuji, T.; Yamashita, S.; Fujinaga, M.; Hiyama, K.; Oka, Y.; Tani, F.; Kamijo, S.; Ishiguro, K. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 1298.
[17]
Sato; Ohki; Sakai; Ryuto Heterocycles 2018, 96, 1259.
[18]
(a) Zhang, L.-Y.; Yang, F.; Shi, W.-Q.; Zhang, P.; Li, Y.; Yin, S.-F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 5722.
[18]
(b) Peet, J.; Selyutina, A.; Bredihhin, A. Biorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 1653.
[19]
Brahmi, F.; Nury, T.; Debbabi, M.; Hadj-Ahmed, S.; Zarrouk, A.; Prost, M.; Madani, K.; Boulekbache-Makhlouf, L.; Lizard, G. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 184.
[20]
Kourounakis, A. P.; Rekka, E. A.; Kourounakis, P. N. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1997, 49, 938.
[21]
Chen, S.; Zhu, H.; Sun, J.; Zhu, L.; Qin, L.; Wan, J. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 1049.
[22]
Moshage, H.; Kok, B.; Huizenga, J. R.; Jansen, P. L. Clin. Chem. 1995, 41, 892.
[23]
Guarrera, M.; Turbino, L.; Rebora, A. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2001, 15, 486.
文章导航

/