However, the tendencies of the AIE behaviors in DMSO/water and CH
3CN/water mixtures were differences, due to the different solvent polarities and viscosities of DMSO and CH
3CN. As is well known, the solvent polarity is largest for water (
ε=80.1,
μ=1.85 D) in three solvents, and that is smallest for CH
3CN (
ε=37.5,
μ=3.92 D) and that is moderate for DMSO (
ε=46.7,
μ=3.96 D). The viscosities are 0.89, 1.99~2.20, and 0.34~0.37 mPa• s (25 ℃) for water, DMSO and CH
3CN, respectively. In the strong polar DMSO/water mixture, the emission peak was located at 622 nm (excited at 370 nm) as
fw=0%, and that was located at 613 nm as
fw=60% (the aggregate state), respectively. In the weak polar CH
3CN/water mixture, the emission peak was located at 627 nm (excited at 390 nm) as
fw=0%, and that was located at 538 nm as
fw=70% (the aggregate state). The blue-shift in the emission wavelength and enhancement in the emission intensity were induced by hydrophobic environment and the restricted intramolecular rotation in the aggregate state.
[31] And compared with in pure solvent, the intensity exhibited nine times increase in the aggregate state of the DMSO/ water mixture, whereas it showed two times increase of the CH
3CN/water mixture, indicating that AIE property had a significantly change with solvent polarity.
[32] Furthermore, the viscosities were 0.89, 1.99~2.20, and 0.34~0.37 mPa•s (25 ℃) for water, DMSO and CH
3CN, respectively. The increased viscosity was further hindrance the free motions of single bond within molecules, which rigidified their conformation and decreased their nonradiative energy loss rate. The significant fluorescence intensity increase appeared at
fw=60% in DMSO/water mixture, while it occurred at
fw=70% in CH
3CN/water mixture. This was because the viscosity in DMSO/water mixture was larger than that in CH
3CN/water mixture under the same other condition.
[33]