有机模板剂对ZSM-11分子筛甲醇制丙烯催化性能的影响

doi:10.6023/A26050179

化学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 84 ›› Issue (9): 1452-1463.DOI: 10.6023/A26050179 上一篇下一篇

研究论文

有机模板剂对ZSM-11分子筛甲醇制丙烯催化性能的影响

原凯^a^,^*(), 李雨薇^a, 宋鑫鹏^a, 薛羽翔^a, 耿琰娜^a, 句宇廷^a, 樊升^b^,^*(), 贾翔宇^a^,^*()

^a 长治医学院药学院药物分子设计与新制剂长治市重点实验室山西长治 046000
^b 中国科学院山西煤炭化学研究所煤炭高效低碳利用全国重点实验室山西太原 030001

投稿日期:2026-06-03 发布日期:2026-06-30
通讯作者: 原凯, 樊升, 贾翔宇
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(22402012); 国家自然科学基金(22502224); 山西省基础研究计划青年基金(202403021222314); 山西省基础研究计划青年基金(202503021212409); 山西省高等学校科技创新基金(2024L272); 长治医学院博士启动基金(BS202302); 长治医学院博士启动基金(2025BS29)

Effect of Organic Template Agents on the Catalytic Performance of ZSM-11 Zeolite for Conversion of Methanol to Propene

Kai Yuan^a^,^*(), Yuwei Li^a, Xinpeng Song^a, Yuxiang Xue^a, Yanna Geng^a, Yuting Ju^a, Sheng Fan^b^,^*(), Xiangyu Jia^a^,^*()

^a Changzhi Key Laboratory of Drug Molecular Design and Innovative Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, China
^b State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, China

Received:2026-06-03 Published:2026-06-30
Contact: Kai Yuan, Sheng Fan, Xiangyu Jia
Supported by:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China(22402012); The National Natural Science Foundation of China(22502224); The Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi province(202403021222314); The Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi province(202503021212409); The Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi(2024L272); The Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Changzhi Medical College(BS202302); The Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Changzhi Medical College(2025BS29)

文章分享

1. Supporting Information-A26050179.pdf(614KB)

摘要/Abstract

分别以1,8-辛二胺(DAO)、四丁基氢氧化铵(TBAOH)和四丁基溴化铵(TBABr)为有机模板剂, 采用水热合成法制备了ZSM-11-DAO、ZSM-11-TBAOH和ZSM-11-TBABr三种ZSM-11分子筛. 通过多种表征手段, 系统研究了有机模板剂对ZSM-11分子筛粒径、酸性质及其甲醇制丙烯(MTP)催化性能的影响. 结果表明, ZSM-11-DAO虽含有更高比例的骨架铝原子落位于直孔道, 但其粒径较大; ZSM-11-TBAOH和ZSM-11-TBABr均具有较小的粒径, 且后者骨架铝原子富集于直孔道内的比例更高. 较小的粒径以及更多骨架铝原子在直孔道内的落位分布特征, 可有效抑制MTP反应中活性芳烃物种的生成及其向积碳前驱体的演变, 从而提高烯烃循环机理的相对贡献. 因此, 与ZSM-11-DAO和ZSM-11-TBAOH相比, ZSM-11-TBABr在MTP反应中表现出更高的丙烯选择性和更长的催化寿命.

关键词: ZSM-11分子筛, 有机模板剂, 粒径, 酸位分布, 甲醇制丙烯

Although ZSM-11 zeolite is an encouraging catalyst for converting methanol to propene (MTP), its inadequate catalytic durability hinders realistic application. Herein, three high-silica ZSM-11 zeolites, designated ZSM-11-DAO, ZSM-11-TBAOH and ZSM-11-TBABr, were synthesized hydrothermally using 1,8-octanediamine (DAO), tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAOH) and tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBABr) as the organic template agents, respectively. The effect of organic template agents on the crystal size and acidic properties of ZSM-11 zeolite as well as its catalytic performance and reaction mechanism in MTP was systematically studied through comprehensive characterization techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), isothermal adsorption of methanol vapor, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH₃-TPD), FT-IR spectra of pyridine adsorption (Py-IR), FT-IR spectra of 2,6-ditert-butylpyridine adsorption (dTBPy-IR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), ultraviolet-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DR UV-vis), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and ¹³C/²⁷Al/²⁹Si MAS NMR. The results indicate that although ZSM-11-DAO zeolite possesses a higher concentration of framework aluminum atoms (Al_F) situated within the straight channels, it features substantially larger crystal size. In contrast, both ZSM-11-TBAOH and ZSM-11-TBABr exhibit comparably smaller crystal size, but the latter contains a greater proportion of Al_F preferentially enriched in the straight channels relative to the former. The synergistic effect of reduced crystal size and preferential enrichment of Al_F within the straight channels effectively suppresses the formation of reactive aromatic intermediates and impedes their further condensation into coke precursors during MTP reaction; consequently, the propagation of the aromatic-based mechanism is significantly inhibited, and the relative contribution of alkene-based mechanism is improved. Compared to both ZSM-11-DAO and ZSM-11-TBAOH, ZSM-11-TBABr zeolite demonstrates higher selectivity to propene and better catalytic stability in MTP. This study not only presents an effective strategy for improving the catalytic performance of high-silica ZSM-11 zeolite in MTP but also unravels the effect of the crystal size and distribution of acid sites on the formation and evolution of active aromatic intermediates.

Key words: ZSM-11 zeolite, organic template agent, crystal size, distribution of acid sites, methanol to propene

引用此文

原凯, 李雨薇, 宋鑫鹏, 薛羽翔, 耿琰娜, 句宇廷, 樊升, 贾翔宇. 有机模板剂对ZSM-11分子筛甲醇制丙烯催化性能的影响[J]. 化学学报, 2026, 84(9): 1452-1463.

Kai Yuan, Yuwei Li, Xinpeng Song, Yuxiang Xue, Yanna Geng, Yuting Ju, Sheng Fan, Xiangyu Jia. Effect of Organic Template Agents on the Catalytic Performance of ZSM-11 Zeolite for Conversion of Methanol to Propene[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2026, 84(9): 1452-1463.

导出引用 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

分享此文

图/表 18

图1. ZSM-11分子筛的宏观(a)和微观(b)孔道结构示意图; 各种ZSM-11分子筛的XRD谱图(c)和在1600~400 cm−1范围内的FT-IR谱图(d)

Figure 1. Schematic representation of pore architectures of ZSM-11 zeolite at the macroscopic (a) and microscopic (b) scales; the XRD patterns (c) and FT-IR spectra (d) in the region 1600~400 cm−1 of various ZSM-11 zeolites

Zeolites	Crystallinity/%	Surface area/ (m²•g⁻¹)		Pore volume/ (cm³•g⁻¹)
Zeolites	Crystallinity/%	total	micro	total	micro
ZSM-11-DAO	100	325	249	0.19	0.12
ZSM-11-TBAOH	100	353	256	0.22	0.12
ZSM-11-TBABr	98	368	268	0.22	0.12

表1. 各种ZSM-11分子筛的相对结晶度和织构性质

Table 1. Relative crystallinity and textural properties of various ZSM-11 zeolites

图2. 各种ZSM-11分子筛的SEM图像

Figure 2. The SEM images of various ZSM-11 zeolites (a) ZSM-11-DAO, (b) ZSM-11-TBAOH, (c) ZSM-11-TBABr

图3. 各种ZSM-11分子筛的N2物理吸附-脱附等温线(a)和甲醇蒸汽吸附等温线(b)

Figure 3. The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (a) and methanol vapor adsorption isotherms (b) of various ZSM-11 zeolites

Zeolites	Si/Al_bulk	NH₃-TPD (μmol•g⁻¹)			Py-IR (μmol•g⁻¹)		dTBPy-IR (μmol•g⁻¹)
Zeolites	Si/Al_bulk	strong	weak	total	Brønsted	Lewis	dTBPy-IR (μmol•g⁻¹)
ZSM-11-DAO	159	84	35	119	51	19	3
ZSM-11-TBAOH	177	74	29	103	34	16	5
ZSM-11-TBABr	178	72	29	101	33	17	2

表2. 各种ZSM-11分子筛的元素组成和酸性性质a

Table 2. Elemental composition and acidic properties of various ZSM-11 zeolitesa

Zeolites	Si/Al_F	Q₃(Si(OAl)₁(OSi)₃) silicon/%	Q₄(Si(OSi)₄) silicon distribution/%
Zeolites	Si/Al_F	104	-109.6	-112.3	-113.7	-115.7
ZSM-11-DAO	165	2.4	5.7	25.4	38.8	27.7
ZSM-11-TBAOH	184	2.2	6.2	31.9	32.6	27.1
ZSM-11-TBABr	186	2.2	4.9	26.8	39.4	26.7

表3. 各种ZSM-11分子筛的29Si MAS NMR分峰拟合信号峰的面积占比a

Table 3. Proportion of integrated peaks obtained by curve fitting of the 29Si MAS NMR spectra of various ZSM-11 zeolitesa

图4. 各种ZSM-11分子筛的NH3-TPD曲线(a)及Py-IR (b)、dTBPy-IR (c)和Al 2p XPS (d)谱图

Figure 4. NH3-TPD profiles (a), Py-IR spectra (b), dTBPy-IR spectra (c) and Al 2p XPS spectra (d) of various ZSM-11 zeolites

图5. 各种ZSM-11分子筛的铝核磁(a)及其分峰拟合谱图(b)

Figure 5. 27Al MAS NMR spectra (a) as well as deconvoluted ones (b) of various ZSM-11 zeolites

Zeolites	Al_F/%	Al_EF/%	Aluminum distribution/%
Zeolites	Al_F/%	Al_EF/%	48.5	53.2	55.6	58.1
ZSM-11-DAO	100	0	6.7	45.9	30.2	17.2
ZSM-11-TBAOH	100	0	7.9	36.0	46.3	9.8
ZSM-11-TBABr	99	1	3.9	44.2	45.4	6.5

表4. 各种ZSM-11分子筛的27Al MAS NMR分峰拟合信号峰的面积占比a

Table 4. Proportion of integrated peaks obtained by curve fitting of the 27Al MAS NMR spectra of various ZSM-11 zeolitesa

图6. 各种ZSM-11分子筛的硅核磁分峰拟合谱图

Figure 6. Deconvolution of the 29Si MAS NMR spectra of various ZSM-11 zeolites

Zeolites	Al_pairs/%	Al_single/%	Aluminum distribution/%
Zeolites	Al_pairs/%	Al_single/%	α	β	γ
ZSM-11-DAO	26.1	73.9	26.8	53.8	19.4
ZSM-11-TBAOH	63.2	36.8	16.4	62.9	20.7
ZSM-11-TBABr	63.4	36.6	28.4	54.8	16.8

表5. 各种Co(II)-ZSM-11分子筛中不同类型铝物种的占比a

Table 5. Proportion of different types of Al species in various Co(II)-ZSM-11 zeolitesa

图7. 各种Co(II)-ZSM-11分子筛的紫外-可见光漫反射光谱图

Figure 7. DR UV-vis spectra of various Co(II)-ZSM-11 zeolites

图8. ZSM-11-DAO (a)、ZSM-11-TBAOH (b)和ZSM-11-TBABr (c)分子筛催化MTP反应中的甲醇转化率、产物选择性以及(P－E)/E值(d)随反应时间的变化; 各种失活ZSM-11分子筛的热重失重曲线(e)

Figure 8. Methanol conversion and product selectivity as a function of time on stream for MTP over ZSM-11-DAO (a), ZSM-11-TBAOH (b) and ZSM-11-TBABr (c); the (P－E)/E ratio (d) as a function of time on stream over the same three zeolites; TGA curves of various spent ZSM-11 zeolites (e). The reactions are performed at 430 ℃ and methanol WHSV of 2.9 h−1 under atmospheric pressure

图9. 在380 ℃、低甲醇转化率下(≈6%)各种ZSM-11分子筛催化MTP反应30 min时的产物选择性和(P－E)/E值

Figure 9. Product selectivity and (P－E)/E ratio for MTP over various ZSM-11 zeolites under conditions of 380  ℃ and low methanol conversion (≈6%) after 30 min on stream

图10. 在380 ℃、WHSV为2.9 h−1条件下通入甲醇反应30 min后, 残留在各种积碳ZSM-11分子筛上的有机物种经二氯甲烷萃取所得可溶部分的GC-MS谱图

Figure 10. GC-MS chromatogram of the CH2Cl2 soluble fraction of the retained organic species extracted from various carbon-deposited ZSM-11 zeolites after methanol reaction for 30 min at 380 ℃ and with a WHSV of 2.9 h−1

图11. 在380 ℃、WHSV为2.9 h−1条件下通入甲醇反应30 min后各种积碳ZSM-11分子筛的13C MAS NMR谱图

Figure 11. The 13C MAS NMR spectra of various carbon-deposited ZSM-11 zeolites after methanol reaction for 30 min at 380 ℃ and with a WHSV of 2.9 h−1

图12. 在380 ℃、WHSV为2.9 h−1条件下通入甲醇反应30 min后各种积碳ZSM-11分子筛的紫外-可见光漫反射光谱图(a)以及分峰拟合后特征吸收峰的积分峰面积(b)

Figure 12. The UV-vis spectra of various carbon-deposited ZSM-11 zeolites after methanol reaction for 30 min at 380 ℃ and with a WHSV of 2.9 h−1 (a), together with the integrated areas of the characteristic absorption bands derived from peak deconvolution (b)

图13. 在430 ℃、WHSV为2.9 h−1条件下通入甲醇反应不同时间后各种ZSM-11分子筛上的碳质物种含量

Figure 13. The content of carbonaceous species over various ZSM-11 zeolites after methanol reaction for varying durations at 430 ℃ and with a WHSV of 2.9 h−1

参考文献 47

[1]	Tian P.; Wei Y. X.; Ye M.; Liu Z. M. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1922. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b00007
[2]	Paunović V.; Liesche G.; Sundmacher K.; Bokhoven J. A. V. Nat. Catal. 2026, 9, 348. doi: 10.1038/s41929-026-01506-x
[3]	Lin S. F.; Li H.; Tian P.; Wei Y. X.; Ye M.; Liu Z. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 11585. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c12145
[4]	Yarulina I.; Chowdhury A. D.; Meirer F.; Weckhuysen B. M.; Gascon J. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 398. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0078-5
[5]	Dokania A.; Gong X.; Abou-Hamad E.; Dikhtiarenko A.; Shoinkhorova T.; Ye Y. R.; Patarroyo J.; Wehbe N.; Chowdhury A. D.; Gascon J. Chem. Catal. 2025, 5, 101168.
[6]	Shen Y. F.; Le T. T.; Fu D. L.; Schmidt J. E.; Filez M.; Weckhuysen B. M.; Rimer J. D. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 11042. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02274
[7]	Wang S.; Wang P. F.; Qin Z. F.; Chen Y. Y.; Dong M.; Li J. F.; Zhang K.; Liu P.; Wang J. G.; Fan W. B. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 5485. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b01054
[8]	Yuan K.; Jia X. Y.; Wang S.; Fan S.; He S. P.; Wang P. F.; Dong M.; Qin Z. F.; Fan W. B.; Wang J. G. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2023, 51, 1652. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(23)60361-5
[9]	Yuan K.; Jia X. Y.; Wang S.; Fan S.; He S. P.; Wang P. F.; Qin Z. F.; Dong M.; Fan W. B.; Wang J. G. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022, 341, 112051. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112051
[10]	Dyballa M.; Becker P.; Trefz D.; Klemm E.; Fischer A.; Jakob H.; Hunger M. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2016, 510, 233. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.11.017
[11]	Ding J.; Zhang Z. Q.; Meng C.; Zhao G. F.; Liu Y.; Lu Y. Catal. Today 2020, 347, 10. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.02.058
[12]	Wang S.; Zhang L.; Li S. Y.; Qin Z. F.; Shi D. Z.; He S. P.; Yuan K.; Wang P. F.; Zhao T. S.; Fan S. B.; Dong M.; Li J. F.; Fan W. B.; Wang J. G. J. Catal. 2019, 377, 81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.07.028
[13]	Yuan K.; Jia X. Y.; Wang S.; Fan S.; He S. P.; Wang P. F.; Qin Z. F.; Dong M.; Fan W. B.; Wang J. G. Chem Synth. 2023, 4, 31. doi: 10.20517/cs
[14]	Wu Q. H.; Ji Z.; Zhang J. H.; Jiao Q. R.; Wang Z. X.; Liu Y.; Dai W. J.; Wang Y.; Li W. L.; Zheng J. J.; Li R. F. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2026, 16, 480. doi: 10.1039/D5CY01063B
[15]	Li M.; Yuan E. H.; Dai W. J.; Wang Y.; Zhou A. N.; Liu Z. W. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 521, 167044. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.167044
[16]	Olsbye U.; Svelle S.; Lillerud K. P.; Wei Z. H.; Chen Y. Y.; Li J. F.; Wang J. G.; Fan W. B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7155. doi: 10.1039/c5cs00304k pmid: 26185806
[17]	Wang S.; Qin Z. F.; Dong M.; Wang J. G.; Fan W. B. Chem. Catal. 2022, 2, 1657.
[18]	Yaripour F.; Shariatinia Z.; Sahebdelfar S.; Irandoukht A. J. Nat. Gas. Sci. Eng. 2015, 22, 260.
[19]	Zhang Y. M.; Zu Y.; Yan K.; Zhu Y.; Luo Y. B.; Xing E. H.; Li Q.; Song L. J.; Li T.; Mei Y.; Shu X. T. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Energy. 2024, 357, 124292.
[20]	Álvaro-Muñoz T.; Márquez-Álvarez C.; Sastre E. Catal. Today 2012, 179, 27. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.07.038
[21]	Ma Y.; Tang X. M.; Hu J. Y.; Ma Y. H.; Chen W.; Liu Z. Q.; Han S. C.; Xu C.; Wu Q. M.; Zheng A. M.; Zhu L. F.; Meng X. J.; Xiao F. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 6270. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c12338
[22]	Yuan K.; Ju Y. T.; Lu N. Y.; Shi J.; Wang P. F. Acta Chim. Sinica 2025, 83, 1184 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6023/A25060240
	(原凯, 句宇廷, 路宁悦, 师晶, 王鹏飞, 化学学报, 2025, 83, 1184.)
[23]	Guo Y. X.; Wang S.; Geng R.; Wang P. F.; Li S. Y.; Dong M.; Qin Z. F.; Wang J. G.; Fan W. B. iScience 2023, 26, 107748. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107748
[24]	Li Y.; Yu M.; Cai K.; Wang M. Y.; Lv J.; Howe R. F.; Huang S. Y.; Ma X. B. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 11374. doi: 10.1039/D0CP00850H
[25]	Ke Q. L.; Khalil I.; Smeyers B.; Li Z.; Oliveira-Silva R. D.; Sels B.; Sakellariou D.; Dusselier M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 24189. doi: 10.1002/anie.202109163 pmid: 34478216
[26]	Liu P.; Ren J.; Sun Y. H. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2008, 114, 365. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.01.022
[27]	Martínez-Franco R.; Li Z. B.; Martínez-Triguero J.; Moliner M.; Corma A. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 2796. doi: 10.1039/C5CY02298C
[28]	Yu B. Y.; Wang Y. N.; Xie S. J.; Chen F. C.; Liu W.; Li X. J.; Zhu X. X.; Xu L. Y. Fuel 2024, 371, 131953. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131953
[29]	Molino A.; Łukaszuk K. A.; Rojo-Gama D.; Lillerud K. P.; Olsbye U.; Bordiga S.; Svelle S.; Beato P. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 6816. doi: 10.1039/C6CC10118F
[30]	Yu Q. J.; Cui C. Y.; Zhang Q.; Chen J.; Li Y.; Sun J. P.; Li C. Y.; Cui Q. K.; Yang C. H.; Shan H. H. J. Energy Chem. 2013, 22, 761. doi: 10.1016/S2095-4956(13)60101-1
[31]	Shen Y. F.; Le T. T.; Li R.; Rimer J. D. ChemPhysChem 2018, 19, 529. doi: 10.1002/cphc.v19.4
[32]	Park J. W.; Kim S. J.; Seo M.; Kim S. Y.; Sugi Y.; Seo G. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2008, 349, 76. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2008.07.006
[33]	Ji Y. J.; Zhang B.; Zhang K.; Xu L.; Peng H. G.; Wu P. Acta Chim. Sinica 2013, 71, 371 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6023/A12110980
	(纪永军, 张斌, 张坤, 徐乐, 彭洪根, 吴鹏, 化学学报, 2013, 71, 371.)
[34]	Zhang J.; Ding X. N.; Liu H. C.; Fan D.; Xu S. T.; Wei Y. X.; Liu Z. M. Acta Chim. Sinica 2022, 80, 590 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6023/A22010014
	(张瑾, 丁湘浓, 刘红超, 樊栋, 徐舒涛, 魏迎旭, 刘中民, 化学学报, 2022, 80, 590.)
[35]	Dědeček J.; Sobalík Z.; Wichterlová B. Catal. Rev.: Sci. Eng. 2012, 54, 135. doi: 10.1080/01614940.2012.632662
[36]	He S. P.; Fan S.; Yuan K.; Guo S. J.; Wang S.; Qin Z. F.; Dong M.; Fan W. B.; Wang J. G. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2022, 637, 118604. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2022.118604
[37]	Svelle S.; Joensen F.; Nerlov J.; Olsbye U.; Lillerud K. P.; Kolboe S.; Bjørgen M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14770. doi: 10.1021/ja065810a pmid: 17105263
[38]	Bjørgen M.; Svelle S.; Joensen F.; Nerlov J.; Kolboe S.; Bonino F.; Palumbo L.; Bordiga S.; Olsbye U. J. Catal. 2007, 249, 195. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2007.04.006
[39]	Xue Y. F.; Li J. F.; Wang P. F.; Cui X. J.; Zheng H. Y.; Niu Y. L.; Dong M.; Qin Z. F.; Wang J. G.; Fan W. B. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2021, 280, 119391. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119391
[40]	Fan S.; Wang H.; Wang P. F.; Jiao W. Y.; Wang S.; Qin Z. F.; Dong M.; Wang J. G.; Fan W. B. Chem Catal. 2024, 4, 100927.
[41]	Fan S.; Wang H.; Wang S.; Dong M.; Fan W. B. Sci China Chem. 2024, 67, 3934. doi: 10.1007/s11426-024-2078-4
[42]	Wang C.; Wang Q.; Xu J.; Qi G. D.; Gao P.; Wang W. Y.; Zou Y. Y.; Feng N. D.; Liu X. L.; Deng F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2507. doi: 10.1002/anie.v55.7
[43]	Wang J. B.; Wei Y. X.; Li J. Z.; Xu S. T.; Zhang W. N.; He Y. L.; Chen J. R.; Zhang M. Z.; Zheng A. M.; Deng F.; Guo X. W.; Liu Z. M. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 89. doi: 10.1039/C5CY01420D
[44]	Mores D.; Stavitski E.; Verkleij S. P.; Lombard A.; Cabiac A.; Rouleau L.; Patarin J.; Simon-Masseron A.; Weckhuysen B. M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 15985. doi: 10.1039/c1cp21324e
[45]	Fu D. L.; Schmidt J. E.; Ristanović Z.; Chowdhury A. D.; Meirer F.; Weckhuysen B. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 11217. doi: 10.1002/anie.v56.37
[46]	Yang L.; Yan T. T.; Wang C. M.; Dai W. L.; Wu G. J.; Hunger M.; Fan W. B.; Xie Z. K.; Guan N. J.; Li L. D. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 6491. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00641
[47]	Burkett S. L.; Davis M. E. Chem. Mater. 1995, 7, 1453. doi: 10.1021/cm00056a009

有机模板剂对ZSM-11分子筛甲醇制丙烯催化性能的影响

Effect of Organic Template Agents on the Catalytic Performance of ZSM-11 Zeolite for Conversion of Methanol to Propene

RichHTML

PDF

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

图/表 18

参考文献 47

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

[1]	原凯, 句宇廷, 路宁悦, 师晶, 王鹏飞. 有机模板剂对ZSM-22分子筛晶化行为、粒径和酸性的影响[J]. 化学学报, 2025, 83(10): 1184-1196.
[2]	陈春辉, 展恩胜, 李勇, 申文杰. α,β-不饱和酸多相不对称氢化反应中的钯粒径和载体酸性效应[J]. 化学学报, 2013, 71(11): 1505-1510.
[3]	张海燕, 杨承广, 孟祥举, 肖丰收. 无有机模板条件下晶种导向合成微孔分子筛晶体材料[J]. 化学学报, 2012, 70(23): 2387-2392.
[4]	于学华, 贺军辉, 胡玉才, 田华, 周丽. Pt/MnO₂纳米结构催化剂的制备与结构表征[J]. 化学学报, 2011, 69(20): 2445-2456.
[5]	陈汝芬, 宋珊珊, 魏雨. 可控粒径及一维链状纳米Fe₃O₄的制备[J]. 化学学报, 2011, 69(14): 1654-1660.
[6]	蒋新, 王金, 李元朴, 范冬冬. CuO/SiO₂制备过程中吸附质相间分配比的调控及其对粒径影响的研究[J]. 化学学报, 2010, 68(11): 1077-1082.
[7]	杜海燕,张军华. 悬浮聚合制备大粒径磁性聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯微珠: 反应参数对微珠粒径的影响[J]. 化学学报, 2009, 67(7): 665-670.
[8]	解丽丽,李庆华,袁昊,王利军,田震,邴乃慈. 介孔SBA-15中有机模板剂的紫外/臭氧法脱除[J]. 化学学报, 2008, 66(19): 2113-2116.
[9]	张洪涛, 陈莉, 段铃丽. 非离子型可聚合聚氨酯/苯乙烯的超浓乳液聚合[J]. 化学学报, 2007, 65(5): 437-444.
[10]	解丽丽,袁昊,胡柳花,金杏妹,吴秀华,王利军,田震,李庆华. 紫外/臭氧法在脱除沸石有机模板剂中的应用[J]. 化学学报, 2007, 65(20): 2285-2290.
[11]	毕迎普,吕功煊,耿东生,毕玉水. 甲醇重整反应中Pt/γ-Al₂O₃催化剂纳米Pt粒径与催化性能关系研究[J]. 化学学报, 2005, 63(9): 802-808.
[12]	朱银燕,张高勇,洪昕林,董金凤,张晓光,曾晖. 微乳中纳米胶囊的复凝聚法制备[J]. 化学学报, 2005, 63(16): 1505-1509.
[13]	董俊萍,余辉,谢颂海,龙英才. 全硅MEL纳米分子筛的合成及物化性质I．全硅MEL纳米分子筛的合成[J]. 化学学报, 2002, 60(5): 950-954.
[14]	张波,张占军,王斌,严捷,李经建,蔡生民. 硅基底金纳米粒子微阵列电极的制备及其电化学性质的研究— 多孔硅电致发光生物传感器研究的前期探索[J]. 化学学报, 2001, 59(11): 1932-1936.
[15]	张长拴,赵峰,张继军,王向宇,鲍改玲,白玉白,李铁津. 纳米尺寸氧化铝的红外光谱研究[J]. 化学学报, 1999, 57(3): 275-280.