Study of the Dielectric Property of Monolayer Confined Water Using A Polarizable Model

doi:10.6023/A20030054

Acta Chimica Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 78 ›› Issue (6): 547-556.DOI: 10.6023/A20030054 Previous Articles Next Articles

Article

应用极化水分子模型研究单分子层受限水的介电性质

范勤, 梁洪涛, 许贤祺, 吕松泰, 梁尊, 杨洋

华东师范大学物理与电子科学学院凝聚态物理研究所上海 200241

投稿日期:2020-03-04 发布日期:2020-06-02
通讯作者: 杨洋 E-mail:yyang@phy.ecnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
项目受国家自然科学基金（Nos.11504110，11874147）、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金和华东师范大学公共创新服务平台（001）资助.

Study of the Dielectric Property of Monolayer Confined Water Using A Polarizable Model

Fan Qin, Liang Hongtao, Xu Xianqi, Lv Songtai, Liang Zun, Yang Yang

School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

Received:2020-03-04 Published:2020-06-02
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11504110, 11874147), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and East China Normal University Multifunctional Platform for Innovation (001).

The direct measurement of the dielectric properties of the confined water is exceedingly challenging, result in the lack of a quantitative understanding of its critical roles in electrochemistry, interfacial reactivity and transport thermodynamics. In this paper, we employ the equilibrium molecular dynamics simulation and the linear response theory-based analytical expressions for the local permittivity tensor, to calculate the static and dynamic dielectric response properties of the monolayer ice and water confined in the 0.65 nm size hydrophobic slab pore under 5×10⁸ Pa lateral pressure and different temperatures. We carry out a detailed comparative study on the performance of predicting the confined structure and dielectric response properties between two well known water molecule models, i.e., constant dipole moment SPC/E model and polarizable SWM4-NDP water model. We have analyzed the probability distributions of the instantaneous SWM4-NDP water molecular dipole moments and calculated the static structure factor, radial dipole-dipole correlation function, static dielectric tensor, total dipole autocorrelation function and Debye relaxation time of each simulation system. For the first time, we found the novel variation of the water molecular polarities, in the monolayer confined liquid and solid phase of water, due to the extreme confinement condition. The performance in describing the structural properties are found comparable between the two water models, and the enhancement of the confinement weakens the advantage of the SWM4-NDP model in predicting the static dielectric property. However, in the prediction of the dynamic properties such as dielectric relaxation time, SWM4-NDP water model is superior to the SPC/E model. Therefore, we suggest that using SWM4-NDP model in the future investigation of the structural phase transition kinetics, ionic transportation and solvation kinetics would be the better choice. The current achievement of the fundamental insight and computational data could potentially facilitate the theoretical advancements in designing new devices of energy storage, sensor, and medicine delivery based on confined water systems.

Key words: confined water, square ice, polarizable water model, molecular dynamics, dielectric property

Cite this article

Fan Qin, Liang Hongtao, Xu Xianqi, Lv Songtai, Liang Zun, Yang Yang. Study of the Dielectric Property of Monolayer Confined Water Using A Polarizable Model[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2020, 78(6): 547-556.

Export EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

share this article

References

[1] Eijkel, J. C. T.; Berg, A. Microfluid Nanofluid 2005, 1, 249.
[2] Granick, S. Science 1991, 253, 1374.
[3] Israelachvili, J. N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 3rd ed., Academic Press, Burlington, 2011.
[4] Leikin, S.; Parsegian, V. A.; Rau, D. C.; Rand, R. P. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1993, 44, 369.
[5] Honig, B.; Nicholls, A. Science 1995, 268, 1144.
[6] Cohen-Tanugi, D.; Grossman, J. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3602.
[7] Szymczyk, A.; Fatin-Rouge, N.; Fievet, P. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 309, 245.
[8] Lin, Y.; Shiomi, J.; Maruyama, S.; Amberg, G. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 045419.
[9] Mikami, F.; Matsuda, K.; Kataura, H.; Maniwa, Y. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 1279.
[10] Toney, M. F.; Howard, J. N.; Richer, J.; Borges, G. L.; Gordon, J. G.; Melroy, O. R.; Wiesler, D. G.; Yee, D.; Sorensen, L. B. Nature 1994, 368, 444.
[11] Ballenegger, V.; Hansen, J. P. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 114711.
[12] Bonthuis, D. J.; Gekle, S.; Netz, R. R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 166102.
[13] Zhang, C.; Gygi, F.; Galli, G. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 2477.
[14] Schlaich, A.; Knapp, E. W.; Netz, R. R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 117, 048001.
[15] Fumagalli, L.; Esfandiar, A.; Fabregas, R.; Hu, S.; Ares, P.; Janardanan, Q. Y.; Radha, B.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Gomila, G.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K. Science 2018, 360, 1339.
[16] Algara-Siller, G.; Lehtinen, O.; Wang, F. C.; Nair, R.; Kaiser, U.; Wu, H.; Geim, A.; Grigorieva, I. Nature 2015, 519, 443.
[17] Du, H.; Liang, H. T.; Yang, Y. Acta Chim. Sinica 2018, 76, 483(in Chinese). (杜涵, 梁洪涛, 杨洋, 化学学报, 2018, 76, 483.)
[18] Liang, Z.; Du, H.; Liang, H. T.; Yang, Y. Mol. Phys. 2019, 117, 2881.
[19] Vega, C.; Abascal, J. L. F. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 19663.
[20] Berendsen, H. J. C.; Grigera, J. R.; Straatsma, T. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6269.
[21] Lamoureux, G.; Harder, E.; Vorobyov, I. V.; Roux, B.; MacKerell, A. D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 418, 245.
[22] Lybrand, T. P.; Kollman, P. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 2923.
[23] Stuart, S. J.; Berne, B. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 100, 11934.
[24] Dequidt, A.; Devèmy, J.; Pádua, A. A. H. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2015, 56, 260.
[25] Shepard, A. C.; Beers, Y.; Klein, G. P.; Rothman, L. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 59, 2254.
[26] Gubskaya, A. V.; Kusalik, P. G. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 5290.
[27] Fernandez, D. P.; Mulev, Y.; Goodwin, A. R. H.; Sengers, J. M. H. L. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1995, 24, 33.
[28] Jones, A. P.; Crain, J.; Sokhan, V. P.; Whitfield, T. W.; Martyna, G. J. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 144103.
[29] Kimmel, G. A.; Matthiesen, J.; Baer, M.; Mundy, C. J.; Petrik, N. G.; Smith, R. S.; Dohnálek, Z.; Kay, B. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12838.
[30] Giovambattista, N.; Rossky, P. J.; Debenedetti, P. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 050603.
[31] Magda, J. J.; Tirell, M.; Davis, H. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 2901.
[32] Werder, T.; Walther, J. H.; Jaffe, R. L.; Halicioglu, T.; Koumoutsakos, P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 1345.
[33] Hockney, R. W.; Eastwood, J. W. Computer Simulation Using Particles, CRC Press, 1988, p. 55.
[34] Yeh, I. C.; Berkowitz, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 3155.
[35] Plimpton, S. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 117, 1.
[36] Ryckaert, J. P.; Ciccotti, G.; Berendsen, H. J. J. Comput. Phys. 1997, 23, 327.
[37] Jiang, W.; Hardy, D. J.; Phillips, J. C.; MacKerell, A. D.; Schulten, K.; Roux, B. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 87.
[38] Wu, A. K.; Lin, S. C.; Karma, A. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 054114.
[39] Luo, C. F.; Fa, W.; Zhou, J.; Dong, J. M.; Zeng, X. C. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 2607.
[40] Wang, X. H.; Feng, L.; Cao, Z. X. Acta Chim. Sinica 2014, 72, 487(in Chinese). (王新华, 冯莉, 曹泽星, 化学学报, 2014, 72, 487.)
[41] Zhou, W.; Yin, K. B.; Wang, C. H.; Zhang, Y. Y.; Xu, T.; Borisevich, A.; Sun, L. T.; Idrobo, J. C.; Chisholm, M. F.; Pantelides, S. T.; Klie, R. F.; Lupini, A. R. Nature 2015, 528, E1.
[42] Wang, F. C.; Wu, H. A.; Geim, A. K. Nature 2015, 528, E3.
[43] Chen, J.; Schusteritsch, G.; Pickard, C. J.; Salzmann, C. G.; Michaelides, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 025501.
[44] Petrenko, V. F.; Whitworth, R. W. Physics of Ice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.
[45] Hill, N. E. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1963, 59, 344.
[46] Kindt, J. T.; Schmuttenmaer, C. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 10373.
[47] Yang, P. L.; Wang, Z. X.; Liang, Z.; Liang, H. T.; Yang, Y. Acta Chim. Sinica 2019, 77, 1045(in Chinese). (杨鹏里, 王振兴, 梁尊, 梁洪涛, 杨洋, 化学学报, 2019, 77, 1045.)

应用极化水分子模型研究单分子层受限水的介电性质

Study of the Dielectric Property of Monolayer Confined Water Using A Polarizable Model

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Liu Zhenyu, Gan Li-Hua. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Acetylene Pyrolysis into Fullerenes [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2023, 81(5): 502-510.
[2]	Yizhi Han, Jianhui Lan, Xue Liu, Weiqun Shi. Advances in Molecular Dynamics Studies of Molten Salts Based on Machine Learning [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2023, 81(11): 1663-1672.
[3]	Ke Zhao, Xiayu Cheng, Xuexue Ma, Minghui Geng. Mechanism of Two-photon Absorption Enhancement for a Piperazine-based Zinc Ion Probe [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2023, 81(10): 1371-1378.
[4]	Yingzhe Du, Heng Zhang, Shiling Yuan. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Thermal Conductivity of Al₂O₃/PDMS Composites [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2021, 79(6): 787-793.
[5]	Chang-An Liu, Shi-Bo Hong, Bei Li. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Stability Behavior of Graphene in Glycerol/Urea Solvents in Liquid-Phase Exfoliation [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2021, 79(4): 530-538.
[6]	Haohao Fu, Haochuan Chen, Hong Zhang, Xueguang Shao, Wensheng Cai. Accurate Estimation of Protein-ligand Binding Free Energies Based on Geometric Restraints [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2021, 79(4): 472-480.
[7]	Zun Liang, Xin Zhang, Songtai Lv, Hongtao Liang, Yang Yang. Crystal-Melt Interface Kinetics and the Capillary Wave Dynamics of the Monolayer Confined Ice-Water Coexistence Lines [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2021, 79(1): 108-118.
[8]	Gao Simeng, Xia Kun, Kang Zhihong, Nai Yongning, Yuan Ruixia, Niu Ruixia. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of “Quasi-Gemini” Anionic Surfactant at the Decane/Water Interface [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2020, 78(2): 155-160.
[9]	Yang, Pengli, Wang, Zhenxing, Liang, Zun, Liang, Hongtao, Yang, Yang. A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study of the Effect of External Electric Field on the Water Surface Potential [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2019, 77(10): 1045-1053.
[10]	Du Han, Liang Hongtao, Yang Yang. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Monolayer Confined Ice-Water Phase Equilibrium [J]. Acta Chim. Sinica, 2018, 76(6): 483-490.
[11]	Yang Zhen, Xue Yijiang, He Yuanhang. Thermal Sensitivity of CL20/DNB Co-crystal Research via Molecular Dynamics Simulations [J]. Acta Chim. Sinica, 2016, 74(7): 612-619.
[12]	Zhang Chuan, Zhang Lujia, Zhang Yang, Huang He, Hu Yi. Study on the Stability and Enzymatic Property Improvement of Porcine Pancreas Lipase Modified by Ionic Liquids Using Molecular Simulation [J]. Acta Chim. Sinica, 2016, 74(1): 74-80.
[13]	Sun Ting, Liu Qiang, Xiao Jijun, Zhao Feng, Xiao Heming. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Interface Interactions and Mechanical Properties of CL-20/HMX Cocrystal and Its Based PBXs [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2014, 72(9): 1036-1042.
[14]	Wang Juan, Xia Shuwei, Yu Liangmin. Hydration Structure of Pb(II) from Density Functional Theory Studies and First-Principles Molecular Dynamics [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2013, 71(9): 1307-1312.
[15]	Li Bo, Zhou Rui, He Gu, Guo Li, Huang Wei. Molecular Docking, QSAR and Molecular Dynamics Simulation on Spiro-oxindoles as MDM2 Inhibitors [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2013, 71(10): 1396-1403.