研究论文

紫外光驱动的芳香醛与邻氨基苯甲酰胺构建喹唑啉酮化合物

  • 冯亚栋 , a, b, * ,
  • 毕寺恒 c ,
  • 唐明清 c ,
  • 吴养洁 a ,
  • 皮超 , a, *
展开
  • a 郑州大学化学学院 河南省高校应用化学重点实验室平原实验室炼焦煤资源绿色开发全国重点实验室 郑州 450052
  • b 厦门医学院公共卫生与医学技术学院 天然化妆品福建省高校工程研究中心 福建厦门 361023
  • c 华侨大学生物医学学院 福建省分子医学重点实验室福建省高校精准医学与分子诊断重点实验室厦门市海洋与基因药物重点实验室 福建厦门 361021

收稿日期: 2026-03-03

  修回日期: 2026-04-24

  网络出版日期: 2026-05-27

基金资助

河南省自然科学基金(252300423136)

福建省自然科学基金(2025J011469)

厦门市自然科学基金(3502Z202372064)

UV-Light-Driven Construction of Quinazolinones from Aryl Aldehydes and Anthranilamides

  • Yadong Feng , a, b, * ,
  • Siheng Bi c ,
  • Mingqing Tang c ,
  • Yangjie Wu a ,
  • Chao Pi , a, *
Expand
  • a State Key Laboratory of Coking Coal Resources Green Exploitation, Pingyuan Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Applied Chemistry of Henan Universities, Henan Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Organic Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052
  • b Engineering Research Center of Natural Cosmeceuticals College of Fujian Province, Department of Public Health and Medical Technology, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, Fujian 361023
  • c Key Laboratory of Xiamen Marine and Gene Drugs, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine and Molecular Diagnosis of Fujian Universities, Key Laboratory of Fujian Molecular Medicine, Engineering Research Centre of Molecular Medicine of Ministry of Education, School of Biomedical Sciences, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, Fujian 361021

Received date: 2026-03-03

  Revised date: 2026-04-24

  Online published: 2026-05-27

Supported by

Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province(252300423136)

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province(2025J011469)

Natural Science Foundation of Xiamen City(3502Z202372064)

Copyright

© 2026 Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences

摘要

开发了一种在无外加光催化剂条件下构建喹唑啉酮骨架的紫外光驱动策略. 廉价易得的叔丁基过氧化氢(TBHP)作为自由基引发剂, 在紫外光照射下促进邻氨基苯甲酰胺与芳香醛之间的自由基参与偶联/环化串联反应, 从而高效获得一系列喹唑啉酮衍生物. 该方法具有操作简便、原料来源广泛以及转化效率良好等优点, 同时避免了过渡金属和外加光催化剂的使用. 因此, 该方法为具有药物相关意义的重要结构单元——喹唑啉酮骨架的绿色可持续合成提供了一种有价值的补充途径.

本文引用格式

冯亚栋 , 毕寺恒 , 唐明清 , 吴养洁 , 皮超 . 紫外光驱动的芳香醛与邻氨基苯甲酰胺构建喹唑啉酮化合物[J]. 有机化学, 2026 , 46(8) : 3114 -3122 . DOI: 10.6023/cjoc202603003

Abstract

A UV-light-driven strategy for the construction of quinazolinone frameworks under photocatalyst-free conditions is developed. Readily available and inexpensive tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) serves as a radical initiator to promote a radical-involved coupling/cyclization cascade between o-aminobenzamides and aryl aldehydes under UV irradiation, affording a range of quinazolinone derivatives efficiently. This protocol features operational simplicity, high feedstock accessibility, and good conversion efficiency, while avoiding the use of transition metals and external photocatalysts. As such, it provides a valuable complementary approach to the green and sustainable synthesis of quinazolinone scaffolds, an important class of pharmaceutical relevant scaffolds.

1 Introduction

Quinazolinones constitute an important class of nitrogen-containing heterocycles that display a broad spectrum of biological and pharmacological activities, including antitumor, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral effects.[1] In addition to their pharmaceutical relevance, quinazolinone derivatives have found widespread applications in agrochemicals and materials science.[2] Consequently, there has been growing interest in the development of synthetic methodologies for quinazolinones. Classical approaches to quinazolinones typically rely on cyclocondensation reactions of o-aminobenzoic acids with amide-type substrates, exemplified by the Niementowski reaction.[3] Recently, transition-metal-catalyzed C—H activation and related catalytic transformations have emerged as powerful alternatives.[4] For instance, Wu and co- workers[5] reported a palladium-catalyzed four-component carbonylative coupling protocol to access diverse 4(3H)- quinazolinones in a concise and convergent manner from 2-bromoanilines, trimethyl orthoformate, and amines under carbon monoxide. Zhu and co-workers[6] developed a Pd- catalyzed imidoylative cycloamidation of N-alkyl-2-iso- cyanobenzamides with 2,6-disubstituted aryl iodides, furnishing axially chiral 2-arylquinazolinones with good yields and high atroposelectivities. In 2024, Das and co- workers[7] disclosed a heterogeneous Pd/C-catalyzed, one- step four-component double carbonylation cascade to synthesize 2-arylquinazolinones from 2-iodoanilines and aryl iodides. In parallel, photoinduced radical processes have emerged as attractive platforms for quinazolinone synthesis because of their operational simplicity and potential sustainability advantages. For example, Le and co- workers[8] developed a visible-light-induced tandem strategy to construct quinazolinones using in situ formed aldehydes under photocatalyst-free conditions at room temperature. Hu and co-workers[9] reported a photosensitizer-free radical cascade to access CF3-containing polycyclic quina-zolinones under visible-light irradiation. Similarly, Yu and co-workers[10] described a photo-triggered self-catalyzed fluoroalkylation/cyclization of unactivated alkenes to afford quinazolinones bearing CF2R group. Despite these advances (Scheme 1, a), the development of greener, more efficient, and simpler methodologies for quinazolinone synthesis remains highly desirable. As part of our continuing interest in green and straightforward strategies for the synthesis and functionalization of quinazolinones,[11] we herein report a photocatalyst-free, metal-free radical coupling/cyclization between aryl aldehydes and anthranilamides enabled by UV irradiation and tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) (Scheme 1, b). This protocol exhibits broad substituent tolerance on both aromatic components and provides a practical and environmentally benign approach to 2-arylquinazolinones of potential pharmaceutical interest, while avoiding transition metals and external photocatalysts.
Scheme 1 Radical coupling reaction of aryl aldehydes with anthranilamides initiated by UV-light

2 Results and discussion

Initially, benzaldehyde (1a) and 2-aminobenzamide (2a) were chosen as model substrates to optimize the reaction conditions (Table 1). To our delight, under UV-light irradiation (λmax=365 nm, 100 W) in O2, using CH3CN as the solvent and t-BuOOH (2.0 equiv.) as the radical initiator, 2-phenylquinazolin-4(3H)-one (3a) was obtained as the main product in 25% yield at 120 ℃ (Table 1, Entry 1). Only trace of 3a was obtained when the reaction was carried out without UV-light (Table 1, Entry 2). In the pre-sence of air and nitrogen, the yield of 3a was reduced to 12% and trace amounts, respectively, highlighting the crucial role of O2 in promoting the reaction (Table 1, Entries 3, 4). When the UV-light wavelength was changed to 254 nm, the reaction did not proceed effectively (Table 1, Entry 5). Increasing the UV-light power to 200, 250, 300 and 400 W resulted in yields of 28%, 33%, 32%, and 30%, respectively (Table 1, Entries 6~9). The reaction did not proceed without the addition of a radical initiato (Table 1, Entry 10). Other radical initiators, including di-tert-butyl peroxide (DTBP), benzoyl peroxide (BPO), tert-butyl peroxide (TBPO), tert-butyl perbenzoate (TBPB), and benzoyl peroxide (BP), were also ineffective in improving the yield (Table 1, Entries 11~15). Various other solvents, such as methanol, dichloroethylene (DCE), dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and toluene, did not significantly enhance the yield either (Table 1, Entries 16~20). Through further optimization of reaction temperature, it was found that increasing the temperature to 140 ℃ improved the yield of 3a to 78% (Table 1, Entry 24 vs Entries 21~23). However, no further improvement was observed at higher temperatures (Table 1, Entries 25, 26). When the reaction time is adjusted to 48 h, the yield of 3a was increased to 90% (Table 1, Entry 31). Longer or shorter reaction times resulted in decreased yields (Table 1, Entry 31 vs Entries 27~30 and 32). Based on the results, the optimal reaction conditions were identified as follows: CH3CN solvent, 140 ℃, t-BuOOH (TBHP, 2.0 equiv.) radical initiator, UV-light (λmax=365 nm, 250 W), O2, 48 h (Table 1, Entry 31).
Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditionsa
Entry λmax/nm P/W Initiator (Dosage/equiv.) Solvent T/℃ t/h Yieldb/%
1 365 100 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 25
2 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 Trace
3c 365 100 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 12
4d 365 100 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 Trace
5 254 100 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 Trace
6 365 200 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 28
7 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 33
8 365 300 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 32
9 365 400 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 30
10 365 250 CH3CN 120 24 nd
11 365 250 DTBP (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 nd
12 365 250 BPO (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 nd
13 365 250 TBPO (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 nd
14 365 250 TBPB (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 21
15 365 250 BP (2.0) CH3CN 120 24 10
16 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3OH 120 24 nd
17 365 250 TBHP (2.0) DCE 120 24 18
18 365 250 TBHP (2.0) DMF 120 24 Trace
19 365 250 TBHP (2.0) DMSO 120 24 nd
20 365 250 TBHP (2.0) Toluene 120 24 16
21 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 100 24 Trace
22 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 110 24 30
23 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 130 24 56
24 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 140 24 78
25 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 150 24 75
26 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 160 24 70
27 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 140 18 55
28 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 140 30 82
29 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 140 36 85
30 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 140 42 87
31 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 140 48 90
32 365 250 TBHP (2.0) CH3CN 140 54 89

a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.30 mmol), 2a (0.1 mmol), TBHP (70% solution in ethyl acetate), solvent (2.0 mL), O2. nd=not detected. b Isolated yields. c Air. d N2.

Under the optimized reaction conditions, the scope of substrates was investigated and the results were shown in Table 2. o-Aminobenzamide with various substituents, such as methyl, fluorine, isopropyl, and methoxy, reacted smoothly with benzaldehyde to give the desired products (3b~3f) in moderate to good yields (72%~88%), which showed that the electron-withdrawing group (F) on o-aminobenzamide has a slight effect on the reaction, while the electron-donating group (methoxy) has almost no effect on the reaction. Meanwhile, the methyl group at either the 6-position or the 7-position of anthranilamide has little effect on the reaction. Benzaldehydes with methyl group at the ortho-, meta-, and para-position provided the corresponding products 3g~3i in 82%, 88% and 90% yields, respectively, which indicated that the steric effects of these substituents had a minimal influence on the transformation. Halogen substituted benzaldehyde (F, Cl, Br) at the 2- or 4-position provided the corresponding products 3j~3m in the yields ranging from 65% to 74%, which supports the possibility of further transformations of the quinazolinone products. Additionally, other groups, such as t-butyl, methoxy and N,N-dimethyl at the 4-position of benzaldehyde were well tolerated and gave the corresponding products (3n~3p) in 72%~82% yields. Furthermore, 1-naphthaldehyde and anthracene-9-carbalde- hyde were also react with o-aminobenzamide (2a) to provide the corresponding products 3q and 3r in 70% and 65% yields, respectively.
Table 2 Scope of substratesa,b

a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.30 mmol), 2 (0.1 mmol), UV-light (365 nm, 250 W), TBHP (2.0 equiv), solvent (2.0 mL), O2, 48 h. b Isolated yields.

To demonstrate the practicality of the reaction, a 1.0 mmol-scale synthesis of compound 3a was performed. By using 3.0 mmol (0.318 g) of benzaldehyde (1a) and 1.0 mmol (0.136 g) of 2-aminobenzamide (2a), the corresponding product 3a was obtained in 78% (0.173 g) yield (Scheme 2), demonstrating the scalability of this reaction.
Scheme 2 Synthesis of product 3a on a 1.0 mmol scale
To elucidate the reaction mechanism, control experiments were carried out (Scheme 3). When 2,2,6,6-tetra- methylpiperidinooxy (TEMPO, 5.0 equiv.), a radical scavenger, was introduced under standard conditions, only trace amounts of the target product 3a was detected by gas chromatography (GC), confirming that the reaction proceeds via a radical pathway (Scheme 3, a). Additionally, in the absence of UV irradiation, the desired product 3a was not obtained, whereas the non-aromatized intermediate 4a was isolated in 42% yield, suggesting that 4a serves as a key intermediate in this reaction (Scheme 3, b). When either TBHP or oxygen was omitted from the reaction sys-tem, product 3a was still not formed, and the yields of 4a were 35% and 33%, respectively (Scheme 3, c and d). These results indicate that UV light, TBHP, and oxygen are all essential for the smooth progress of the overall reaction. When the presumed intermediate, 2-phenyl-2,3-dihy- droquinazolin-4(1H)-one (4a), was treated under standard conditions, the target product 3a was obtained in 92% yield, indicating that 4a is a key intermediate in the reaction (Scheme 3, e). Regarding the transformation of 4a to 3a, the reaction failed to proceed in the absence of either UV light or oxygen. In contrast, the conversion proceeded efficiently under UV irradiation in the presence of oxygen but without TBHP (Scheme 3, f, g and h), demonstrating that oxygen is indispensable for the dehydrogenative aromatization of 4a under UV light.
Scheme 3 Control experiments
Based on the control experiments, the references and our previous work,[12] a plausible reaction mechanism was proposed as shown in Scheme 4. The formation of 2-phen- ylquinazolin-4(3H)-one (3a) may proceed through two distinct cyclization pathways starting from benzaldehyde (1a) and 2-aminobenzamide (2a), both converging at the common dihydroquinazolinone intermediate 4a, which subsequently undergoes oxidative aromatization to afford the final product. Under thermal conditions, condensation of 1a and 2a initially gives the Schiff base intermediate A. Subsequent intramolecular nucleophilic attack of the amide nitrogen on the imine carbon leads to cyclization, thereby furnishing intermediate 4a. Alternatively, under UV irradiation in the presence of TBHP, benzaldehyde (1a) undergoes oxidation and then reacts with 2-aminobenzamide (2a) to form the same intermediate 4a through a radical cyclization pathway. Subsequently, upon exposure to UV light in the presence of molecular oxygen, intermediate 4a undergoes oxidative dehydrogenative aromatization to furnish the fully aromatic quinazolinone product 3a.
Scheme 4 Proposed reaction mechanism

3 Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a metal-free, UV-light- driven between aryl aldehydes and anthranilamides for the efficient synthesis of 2-arylquinazolinones. This transformation proceeds smoothly under ultraviolet irradiation without the need for any external photocatalyst. Notably, the protocol exhibits broad functional-group tolerance, accommodating both electron-donating and electron- withdrawing substituents on the aromatic rings with good efficiency. Overall, this method offers a simple and greener approach to access 2-arylquinazolinones with potential pharmaceutical relevance, while avoiding the use of transition-metal catalysts and photocatalysts. Further studies aimed at expanding the synthetic applications are currently underway in our laboratory.

4 Experimental section

4.1 General experimental information

All manipulations were conducted using standard Schlenk techniques under oxygen atmosphere. Unless otherwise stated, all commercial materials and solvents were used as received without further purification. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer (1H NMR 400 MHz, 13C NMR 100 MHz) using Chloroform-d and DMSO-d6 as the solvent and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard at room temperature. Chemical shifts are reported relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS) with the solvent resonance as the internal standard (Chloroform-d: δH 7.26, δC 77.2; DMSO-d6: δH 2.50, δC 39.5). Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (70~230 mesh ASTM) using the specified eluents. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on silica gel 60 F254 plates (4 cm×15 cm, 0.2 mm thickness).

4.2 Experimental method

In a 20 mL oven-dried Schlenk tub, 1 (0.30 mmol), 2 (0.10 mmol), and TBHP (0.20 mmol) were added, followed by the addition of toluene (2.0 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred in an oil bath at 140 ℃ under UV- light (λmax=365 nm, 250 W) in an oxygen atmosphere for 48 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC. After the reaction was completed, the solution was quenched with 10.0 mL of H2O, then extracted with ethyl acetate (10.0 mL×3). The combined organic phases were washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using an eluent of petroleum ether/ethyl acetate with a volume ratio changing from 10∶1 to 2∶1 to obtain the desired product 3.
2-Phenylquinazolin-4(3H)-one (3a):[11a] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=5∶1). White solid, yield 90% (20.0 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 12.52 (s, 1H), 8.14~8.18 (m, 3H), 7.81~7.83 (m, 1H), 7.72~7.75 (m, 1H), 7.62~7.45 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.7, 152.8, 149.2, 135.1, 133.2, 131.9, 129.1, 128.2, 128.0, 127.0, 126.3, 121.5.
6-Methyl-2-phenylquinazolin-4(3H)-one (3b):[11a] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=10∶1). White oil, yield 82% (19.4 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 12.45 (s, 1H), 8.15 (dd, J=7.8, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 8.03~7.86 (m, 1H), 7.64 (d, J=1.9 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (dt, J=8.6, 6.5 Hz, 3H), 2.45 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.6, 151.9, 147.2, 136.8, 136.4, 133.3, 131.7, 129.1, 128.1, 127.9, 125.7, 121.2, 21.3.
7-Methyl-2-phenylquinazolin-4(3H)-one (3c):[11a] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=10∶1). White oil, yield 84% (19.8 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 12.42 (s, 1H), 8.34~8.12 (m, 2H), 8.03 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.69~7.48 (m, 4H), 7.33 (dd, J=8.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 2.53~2.37 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.6, 152.8, 149.3, 145.5, 133.3, 131.8, 129.1, 128.5, 128.2, 127.6, 126.2, 119.1, 21.8.
6-Fluoro-2-phenylquinazolin-4(3H)-one (3d):[11a] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=10∶1). White oil, yield 78% (18.7 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 12.64 (s, 1H), 8.47~8.00 (m, 2H), 7.86~7.78 (m, 2H), 7.71 (td, J=8.7, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 7.62~7.44 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.1, 161.7, 159.2, 152.3, 146.1, 133.0, 131.9, 130.8 (d, J=8.3 Hz), 129.1, 128.2, 123.5 (d, J=24.1 Hz), 122.7 (d, J=8.2 Hz), 111.0 (d, J=23.3 Hz).
6-Isopropyl-2-phenylquinazolin-4(3H)-one (3e):[11a] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=10∶1). White solid, yield 88% (23.2 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 12.47 (s, 1H), 8.23~8.08 (m, 2H), 8.05~7.95 (m, 1H), 7.78~7.40 (m, 5H), 3.06 (p, J=6.9 Hz, 1H), 1.26 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.8, 152.0, 147.5, 134.0, 133.2, 131.7, 129.0, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.0, 122.8, 121.2, 33.7, 24.2.
6-Methoxy-2-phenylquinazolin-4(3H)-one (3f):[1j] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=2∶1). White solid, yield 85% (21.4 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO- d6) δ: 12.52 (s, 1H), 8.17 (dd, J=8.0, 1.7 Hz, 3H), 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.60~7.52 (m, 4H), 7.45 (dd, J=8.9, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.5, 158.2, 150.6, 143.7, 133.2, 131.5, 129.7, 129.0, 128.0, 124.6, 122.2, 106.3, 56.1.
2-(o-Tolyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3g):[11a] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=5∶1). White solid, yield 82% (19.4 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 12.43 (s, 1H), 8.15 (dd, J=8.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (ddd, J=8.5, 7.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (dd, J=8.3, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.57~7.46 (m, 2H), 7.42 (td, J=7.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.37~7.27 (m, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.3, 154.9, 149.2, 136.6, 134.9, 134.7, 131.0, 130.4, 129.6, 127.8, 127.1, 126.3, 126.2, 121.4, 20.0.
2-(m-Tolyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3h):[11a] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=5∶1). White solid, yield 88% (20.7 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 12.46 (s, 1H), 8.14 (dd, J=7.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.96 (dd, J=7.2, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (ddd, J=8.5, 7.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (dd, J=8.1, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (ddd, J=8.1, 7.0, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.46~7.34 (m, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.7, 152.9, 149.2, 138.4, 135.1, 133.1, 132.5, 129.0, 128.8, 128.0, 127.0, 126.3, 125.4, 121.4, 21.4.
2-(p-Tolyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3i):[11a] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=5∶1). White solid, yield 90% (21.2 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 8.15 (dd, J=7.9, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.12~8.01 (m, 2H), 7.83 (ddd, J=8.4, 7.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (dd, J=8.3, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (ddd, J=8.1, 7.0, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (s, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.8, 152.8, 141.9, 135.0, 130.3, 129.7, 128.2, 127.8, 126.9, 126.3, 121.3, 21.5.
2-(2-Fluorophenyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3j):[1h] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=10∶1). White solid, yield 72% (17.3 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 12.59 (s, 1H), 8.18 (dd, J=8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (dt, J=19.0, 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.44~7.33 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 161.9, 150.4, 149.1, 135.1, 133.3 (d, J=8.5 Hz), 131.49 (d, J=2.2 Hz), 128.0, 127.5, 126.3, 125.1 (d, J=3.4 Hz), 122.7 (d, J=13.0 Hz), 121.6, 116.6 (d, J=21.3 Hz).
2-(4-Fluorophenyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3k):[11a] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=10∶1). White solid, yield 74% (17.8 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO- d6) δ: 8.26 (dd, J=9.0, 5.4 Hz, 2H), 8.16 (dd, J=7.9, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (ddd, J=8.4, 7.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (dd, J=8.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (ddd, J=8.1, 7.1, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (t, J=8.9 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 165.7, 163.3, 162.7, 151.9, 149.0, 135.1, 130.8 (d, J=9.0 Hz), 129.7 (d, J=2.9 Hz), 127.8, 127.1, 126.3, 121.3, 116.1 (d, J=21.9 Hz).
2-(4-Chlorophenyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3l):[11a] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=10∶1). White solid, yield: 65% (16.6 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO- d6) δ: 8.20 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 8.16 (d, J=9.3 Hz, 1H), 7.89~7.80 (m, 1H), 7.74 (d, J=7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.7, 151.8, 149.0, 136.8, 135.1, 132.0, 130.1, 129.1, 127.9, 127.2, 126.3, 121.4.
2-(4-Bromophenyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3m):[11a] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=2∶1). White solid, yield 70% (21.1 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO- d6) δ: 12.62 (s, 1H), 8.14 (tt, J=9.3, 2.0 Hz, 3H), 7.85 (ddd, J=8.5, 7.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.81~7.70 (m, 3H), 7.54 (ddd, J=8.1, 7.1, 1.2 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.6, 151.9, 149.0, 135.1, 132.4, 132.1, 130.37, 128.0, 127.3, 126.3, 125.7, 121.5.
2-(4-(tert-Butyl)phenyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3n):[1g] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=5∶1). white solid, yield 82% (22.8 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO- d6) δ: 12.50 (s, 1H), 8.31~8.06 (m, 3H), 7.83 (ddd, J=8.5, 7.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (dd, J=8.3, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.60~7.46 (m, 3H), 1.32 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO- d6) δ: 162.7, 154.8, 152.62, 149.3, 135.0, 130.4, 128.0, 127.9, 126.9, 126.3, 125.9, 121.4, 35.1, 31.4.
2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3o):[11a] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=2∶1). white solid, yield 80% (20.2 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO- d6) δ: 12.42 (s, 1H), 8.17 (dd, J=24.3, 8.8 Hz, 3H), 7.82 (t, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 2H), 3.86 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.3, 135.0, 129.9, 128.7, 127.7, 126.6, 126.3, 125.3, 121.1, 117.5, 114.5, 114.1, 55.9.
2-(4-(Dimethylamino)phenyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3p):[1g] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=2∶1). White solid, yield 72% (19.1 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 12.19 (s, 1H), 8.11 (td, J=7.7, 1.8 Hz, 3H), 7.77 (ddd, J=8.5, 7.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (dd, J=8.3, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (ddd, J=8.1, 7.1, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.96~6.61 (m, 2H), 3.01 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.9, 152.7, 134.9, 129.3, 127.3, 126.3, 125.9, 120.8, 119.2, 111.7, 40.1.
2-(Naphthalen-1-yl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3q):[1g] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=5∶1). white solid, yield: 70% (19.0 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO- d6) δ: 12.68 (s, 1H), 8.23 (dd, J=7.9, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.20~8.15 (m, 1H), 8.15~8.10 (m, 1H), 8.09~8.01 (m, 1H), 7.88 (ddd, J=8.5, 7.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (dd, J=7.1, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (dd, J=8.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.69~ 7.53 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 162.3, 154.5, 148.8, 135.0, 133.6, 132.2, 130.9, 130.7, 128.8, 128.2, 127.9, 127.5, 127.3, 126.8, 126.3, 125.7, 125.6, 121.7.
2-(Anthracen-9-yl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3r):[1i] Eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=5∶1). white solid, yield 65% (20.9 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ: 9.75 (s, 1H), 8.58 (s, 1H), 8.34 (d, J=7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (dd, J=6.8, 3.4 Hz, 2H), 7.93~7.79 (m, 3H), 7.62 (ddd, J=8.0, 5.5, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 7.53~7.44 (m, 4H), 7.28 (d, J=1.4 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ: 162.1, 152.1, 149.0, 135.1, 131.1, 129.9, 129.6, 128.8, 128.1, 127.6, 127.5, 127.1, 126.6, 125.7, 124.5, 121.3.

4.3 Procedure for the synthesis of product 3a on a 1.0 mmol scale

To a oven-dried Schlenk tube, 1a (318.0 mg, 3.0 mmol), 2a (136.0 mg, 1.0 mmol), and TBHP (180.0 mg, 2.0 mmol) were added, followed by the addition of 10.0 mL of CH3CN. The resulting mixture was stirred in an oil bath at 140 ℃ under UV-light (λmax=365 nm, 250 W) in an oxygen atmosphere for 48 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC. The solution was quenched with 60.0 mL of H2O, then extracted with ethyl acetate (20.0 mL×3). The combined organic phases were washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (VV=5∶1) eluent to obtain the desired product 3a (173.0 mg, 78% yield).
Supporting Information 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of compounds 3a~3r. The Supporting Information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://sioc- journal.cn.
(Zhao, C.)
[1]
(a) Li, S.; Ma, J.-A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7439.

(b) Michael, J. P. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2003, 20, 476.

(c) Chen, X.-W.; Rao, L.; Chen, J.-L.; Zou, Y. J. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6522.

(d) Chojnacka, W.; Teng, J.; Kim, J. J.; Jensen, A. A.; Hibbs, R. E. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 5244

(e) Lv, Y.-X.; Zeng, F.-L.; Loh, T.-P.; Jia, Z.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202217386.

(f) Luo, X.-Y.; Abrams, R.; Martin, R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2025, 23, 9554.

(g) Li, H.; He, L.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M.; Wu, X-F. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 1336.

(h) Ji, M.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, H.; Gu, Y.; Chu, W. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 13798.

(i) Parua, S.; Das, S.; Sikari, R.; Sinha, S.; Paul, N. D. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 7165.

(j) Chen, J.; Liang, E.; Shi, J.; Wu, Y.; Wen, K.; Yao, X.; Tang, X. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 4966.

[2]
(a) Chen, Y.; Sun, S.-N.; Chen, X.-H.; Chen, M.-L.; Lin, J.-M.; Niu, Q.; Li, S.-L.; Liu, J.; Lan, Y.-Q. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2413638.

(b) Dong, L.-L.; Shen, S.-Q.; Jiang, X.; Ding, B.-L.; Yang, M.-L.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y.-X.; Chen, Z.-Y.; Cao, Q.-N.; Gao, Y.-M.; Ma, S.-J.; Zhang, L.-H.; Dong, J.-G.; Yang, Q. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 17410.

[3]
(a) Borah, B.; Swain, S.; Patat, M.; Chowhan, L. R. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 991026.

(b) Luo, T.-J.; Li, Z.-M.; Zhao, W.-G.; Fan, Z.-J. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 22, 741 (in Chinese).

(罗铁军, 李正名, 赵卫光, 范志金, 有机化学, 2002, 22, 741.)

(c) Alexandre, F.; Berecibar, A.; Besson, T. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 3911.

(d) Kakati, P.; Kakati, P.; Yadav, P.; Awasthi, S. K. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 6724.

(e) Amrutkar, R. D.; Ranawat, M. S. Med. Chem. 2021, 17, 453.

[4]
(a) Zou, J.-Y.; Yang, Y.-Y.; Gu, J.; Liu, F.; Ye, Z.-W.; Yi, W.-B.; He, Y. Angew. Chem., nt. Ed. 2023, 62, e202310320.

(b) Thrilokraj, R.; Małecki, J. G.; Budagumpi, S.; Kshirsagar, U. A.; Dateer, R. B. Green Chem. 2024, 26, 4723.

(c) Ghosh, P.; Ganguly, B.; Das, S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 4497.

(d) Xu, Z.-W.; Leng, Y.-T.; Song, M.-D.; Wu, Y.-S.; Wu, Y.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2025, 90, 16169.

(e) Nandy, A.; Banerjee, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 41242.

(f) Barick, S.; Chandrashekharappa, S. Tetrahedron 2025, 187, 134940.

(g) Wang, M.; Li, K.; Xue, J.; Hu, K.; Guo, D.; Cai, Q. Tetrahedron 2025, 185, 134858.

(h) Wang, J.; Gong, T.; Zhuang, Z.; Sun, B.; Zhang, F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2025, 23, 4371.

(i) Liu, C.; Wang, KJ.; Xu, M.; Luo, Q.; Wang, Z.; Tan, W.; Zhao, X.; Jia, X. New J. Chem. 2024, 48, 2367.

[5]
He, L.; Li, H.-Q.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M.; Wu, X.-F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1420.

[6]
Teng, F.; Yu, T.; Peng, Y.; Hu, W.-M.; Hu, Z.; He, Y.-M.; Luo, S.; Zhu, Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 2722.

[7]
Poonam Sharma, S.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, N.; Giri, K.; Das, P. Chem. Commun. 2024, 60, 6043.

[8]
Xie, Z.; Lan, J.; Zhu, H.; Lei, G.; Jiang, G.; Le, Z. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 1427.

[9]
Hu, Q.; Yu, W.-L.; Luo, Y.-C.; Hu, X.-Q.; Xu, P.-F. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 87, 1493.

[10]
Yang, J.; Sun, B.; Ding, H.; Huang, P.; Tang, X.; Shi, R.; Yan, Z.; Yu, C.; Jin, C. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 575.

[11]
(a) Feng, Y.-D.; Li, Y.-D.; Cheng, G.-L.; Wang, L.-H.; Cui, X.-L. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 7099.

(b) Feng, Y.-D.; Tian, N.; Li, Y.-D.; Jia, C.-Q.; Li, X.-N.; Wang, L.-H.; Cui, X.-L. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1658.

(c) Feng, Y.-D.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Fu, Q.; Yao, Q.-H.; Huang, H.-B.; Shen, J.-H.; Cui, X.-L. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 58.

(d) Feng, Y.-D.; Wu, Z.-P.; Chen, T.; Fu, Q.; Yao, Q.-H.; Shen, J.-H; Cui, X.-L. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 3263.

[12]
(a) Xiao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Feng, Y.; Cui, X. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 41, 4808 (in Chinese).

(肖玉娟, 杨阳, 张凡, 冯亚栋, 崔秀灵, 有机化学, 2021, 41, 4808.)

(b) Xu, L.; Lu, L.; Cai, J.; Feng, Y.; Cui, X. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 42, 1210 (in Chinese).

(许丽梅, 卢林燕, 蔡尽忠, 冯亚栋, 崔秀灵, 有机化学, 2022, 42, 1210.)

(c) Xie, K.-C.; Jiang, M.-X.; Chen, X.-L.; Lv, Q.-Y.; Yu, B. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 41, 4575 (in Chinese).

(谢坤宸, 江铭轩, 陈晓岚, 吕琪妍, 於兵, 有机化学, 2021, 41, 4575.)

(d) Ye, Z.-H.; Liu, H.-Q.; Zhang, F.-Z.; Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2024, 44, 840 (in Chinese).

(叶增辉, 刘华清, 张逢质, 有机化学, 2024, 44, 840.)

(e) Goti, G.; Manal, K.; Sivaguru, J.; Dell'Amico, L. Nat. Chem. 2024, 16, 684.

(f) Li, H.-J.; Chen, S.; Wang, J.-X.; Zhang, M.-X.; Wu, W.-H.; Liu, W.; Sun, P. Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 592.

(g) Tan, H.-B.; Liu, Y.-S.; Zhou, J.-Y.; Cao, M.; Lei, T.; Ren, S.-Y.; Lin, C.-Q.; Yang, Y.-F.; Hu, Z.-L.; Xu, Z.-G.; Tang, D.-Y.; Chen, Z.-Z.; Qu, X.-Y. Org. Lett. 2024, 26, 3304.

(h) Huang, H.; Steiniger, K. A.; Lambert, T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 12567.

(i) Buzzetti, L.; Crisenza, G. E. M.; Melchiorre, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 3730.

文章导航

/