Au-Pt催化剂的控制合成及其对乙醇电氧化性能

doi:10.6023/A17110478

化学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 76 ›› Issue (4): 292-297.DOI: 10.6023/A17110478 上一篇下一篇

研究论文

Au-Pt催化剂的控制合成及其对乙醇电氧化性能

吴匡衡^a, 周亚威^a, 马宪印^b, 丁辰^a, 蔡文斌^a

a 复旦大学化学系能源材料化学协同创新中心上海市分子催化与功能材料表面重点实验室上海 200433;
b 上海电力学院环境与化学工程学院上海市电力材料防护与新材料重点实验室上海 200090

投稿日期:2017-11-02 发布日期:2018-03-12
通讯作者: 蔡文斌 E-mail:wbcai@fudan.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（Nos.21473039，21733004），上海市国际科技合作基金（No.17520711200）和973计划（No.2015CB932303）资助项目.

Controlled Synthesis of Gold-Platinum Catalysts for Ethanol Electro-oxidation Reaction

Wu Kuangheng^a, Zhou Yawei^a, Ma Xianyin^b, Ding Chen^a, Cai Wenbin^a

a Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433;
b Shanghai Key Laboratory of Materials Protection and Advanced Materials in Electric Power, College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090

Received:2017-11-02 Published:2018-03-12
Contact: 10.6023/A17110478 E-mail:wbcai@fudan.edu.cn
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21473039, 21733004), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Mu-nicipality (No. 17520711200) and 973 program (No. 2015CB932303).

文章分享

1. Au-Pt催化剂的控制合成及其对乙醇电氧化性能.PDF(831KB)

摘要/Abstract

乙醇电氧化（EOR）是直接乙醇燃料电池和电解乙醇制氢共有的阳极反应.Au@Pt核壳和AuPt合金是广泛使用的两种电催化材料，迄今尚无两者对EOR性能的对比研究.以CO作为还原剂和淬灭剂合成了近似Pt单层的Au@Pt/C催化剂，作为对照，以NaBH₄还原法合成了相同Au∶Pt物质的量比和金属载量的AuPt/C催化剂；运用透射电子显微镜（TEM）、扫描透射电子显微镜-能谱仪（STEM-EDS）、X射线粉末衍射（XRD）和X射线光电子能谱（XPS）等手段综合表征了两者结构之差异，同时以电化学循环伏安法和计时电流法测试了在碱性体系中其对EOR的电催化性能.结果表明，相比于商业化的Pt/C和Au/C，Au@Pt/C和AuPt/C对EOR的活性和稳定性均有着显著提升；Au@Pt/C对EOR的电催化活性和对C—C键断裂能力略优于AuPt/C.双金属催化剂中Au与Pt之间的晶格应力和部分电荷转移等效应可能是其性能提升的主要原因.

关键词: 乙醇电氧化, 电催化, 金-铂催化剂, 核壳结构, 合金结构

Ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) is a common anode process for direct ethanol fuel cell (DEFC) and ethanol reforming electrolyzer. Au@Pt and AuPt alloy are widely used bimetallic catalysts, yet no comparative study has been reported of electrocatalysis of EOR on these two differently structured catalysts. The present work aims to synthesize and characterize carbon supported Au@Pt and AuPt with controlled composition and size, and compare their electrocatalytic activities and stabilities toward EOR in alkaline media. For the synthesis of Au@Pt/C, a 5-nm Au colloid was first obtained by adding excessive amount of sodium borohydride to a chloroauric acid precursor containing sodium citrate with a mixed ice-water bath. CO gas was bubbled into the Au colloidal solution at 60℃ under strong stirring to reduce a desired amount of potassium tetrachloroplatinate(Ⅱ) to terminate Pt quasi-monolayer shell on Au nanoparticle core. A sonicated carbon black (Vulcan XC-72) aqueous slurry was then dropwise added to the above Au@Pt colloid, and the mixture was kept stirring for 48 h to ensure the exhaustive loading of Au@Pt nanoparticles onto the carbon support. For the synthesis of AuPt/C with the same Au:Pt molar ratio and metal loading as that for Au@Pt/C, coreduction of the Au(Ⅲ) and Pt(Ⅱ) species was attained by using sodium borohydride as the reducing agent with the rest procedures being same as the above mentioned. X-ray diffractometry (XRD) revealed that the diffraction peaks for Au@Pt/C were virtually same as those for Au/C, consistent with a Pt quasi-monolayer, while the diffraction peaks for AuPt/C located in between those for Au/C and Pt/C. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results were consitent with the different structures of the two catalysts, and the Pt core level shift suggested an upshift of Pt d-band center for both bimetallic catalysts. Cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry revealed markedly increased EOR current on Au@Pt/C and AuPt/C, as compared to that of Pt/C and Au/C. CO-stripping voltammetry on Au@Pt/C and AuPt/C indicated that surface reconstruction occurred by potential cycling, resulting in a decrease of exposed Pt sites but not the electrocatalytic activities. ¹H NMR analysis confirmed the C2 pathway is predominant. Nevertheless, Au@Pt/C outperformed AuPt/C and Pt/C with a lower onset oxidation potential and a higher peak current for EOR, as well as a slightly higher selectivity toward C1 pathway. Although the synergetic effect of Au-Pt bimetallic interface for EOR is not well understood, the enhanced adsorption of ethanol, OH, acetyl and CO on Pt sites may be accountable for the observed results.

Key words: ethanol oxidation reaction, electrocatalysis, AuPt bimetallic catalysts, core-shell structure, alloy structure

引用此文

吴匡衡, 周亚威, 马宪印, 丁辰, 蔡文斌. Au-Pt催化剂的控制合成及其对乙醇电氧化性能[J]. 化学学报, 2018, 76(4): 292-297.

Wu Kuangheng, Zhou Yawei, Ma Xianyin, Ding Chen, Cai Wenbin. Controlled Synthesis of Gold-Platinum Catalysts for Ethanol Electro-oxidation Reaction[J]. Acta Chim. Sinica, 2018, 76(4): 292-297.

导出引用 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

分享此文

参考文献

[1] Li, H. H.; Zhao, S.; Gong, M.; Cui, C. H.; He, D.; Liang, H. W.; Liang, W.; Yu, S. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7472.
[2] Coutanceau, C.; Baranton, S. WIREs Energy Environ. 2016, 5, 388.
[3] de Lucas-Consuegra, A.; Ana, R.; Calcerrada, A. B.; Linares, J. J.; Horwat, D. J. Power Sources 2016, 321, 248.
[4] Chen, H. M.; Xing, Z. L.; Zhu, S. Q.; Zhang, L. L.; Chang, Q. W.; Huang, J. L.; Cai, W. B.; Kang, N.; Zhong, C. J.; Shao, M. H. J. Power Sources 2016, 321, 264.
[5] Lamy, C.; Lima, A.; LeRhun, V.; Delime, F.; Coutanceau, C.; Leger, J. M. J. Power Sources 2002, 105, 283
[6] Rao, L.; Jiang, Y. X.; Zhang, B. W.; You, L. X. H.; Li, Z. H.; Sun, S. G. Prog. Chem. 2014, 26, 727(in Chinese). (饶路, 姜艳霞, 张斌伟, 游乐星, 李崭虹, 孙世刚, 化学进展, 2014, 26, 727.)
[7] Zheng, H. T.; Li, Y.; Chen, S.; Shen, P. K. J. Power Sources 2006, 163, 371.
[8] Wang, Y.; Zou, S.; Cai, W. B. Catalysts 2015, 5, 1507.
[9] Xu, C. W.; Cheng, L. Q.; Shen, P. K.; Liu, Y. L. Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9, 997.
[10] Wang, Y.; Jiang, K.; Cai, W. B. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 162, 100.
[11] Adzic, R. R.; Zhang, J.; Sasaki, K.; Vukmirovic, M. B.; Shao, M.; Wang, J. X.; Nilekar, A. U.; Mavrikakis, M.; Valerio, J. A.; Uribe, F. Top. Catal. 2007, 46, 249.
[12] Mulvaney, S. P.; Keating, C. D. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 145.
[13] Enache, D. I.; Edwards, J. K.; Landon, P.; Solsona-Espriu, B.; Carley, A. F.; Herzing, A. A.; Watanabe, M.; Kiely, C. J.; Knight, D. W.; Hutchings, G. J. Science 2006, 311, 362.
[14] Song, H. M.; Anjum, D. H.; Sougrat, R.; Hedhili, M. N.; Khashab, N. M. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 25003.
[15] Chen, Y. G.; Zhuang, L.; Lu, J. T. Chin. J. Catal. 2007, 28, 870(in Chinese).(陈酉贵, 庄林, 陆君涛, 催化学报, 2007, 28, 870.)
[16] Li, J. F.; Yang, Z. L.; Ren, B.; Liu, G. K.; Fang, P. P.; Jiang, Y. X.; Wu, D. Y.; Tian, Z. Q. Langmuir 2006, 22, 10372.
[17] Dai, Y.; Chen, S. L. ACS Appl. Mater. 2014, 7, 823.
[18] Brankovic, S. R.; Wang, J. X.; Adzic, R. R. Surf. Sci. 2001, 474, 173.
[19] Liu, Y.; Gokcen, D.; Bertocci, U.; Moffat, T. P. Science 2012, 338, 1327.
[20] Engelbrekt, C.; Seselj, N.; Poreddy, R.; Riisager, A.; Ulstrup, J.; Zhang, J. D. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 3278.
[21] Zhou, Y. W.; Du, C. Y.; Han, G.; Gao, Y. Z.; Yin, G. P. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 217, 203.
[22] Xu, C. X.; Wang, R. Y.; Chen, M. W.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, Y. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 239.
[23] Zeng, J.; Yang, J.; Lee, J. Y.; Zhou, W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 24606.
[24] Xu, Y. Y.; Dong, Y. N.; Shi, J.; Xu, M. L.; Zhang, Z. F.; Yang, X. K. Catal. Commun. 2011, 13, 54.
[25] Ye, W.; Kou, H.; Liu, Q.; Yan, J.; Zhou, F.; Wang, C. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2012, 37, 4088.
[26] Kitchin, J. R.; Norskov, J. K.; Barteau, M. A.; Chen, J. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 156801.
[27] Demirci, U. B. J. Power Sources 2007, 173, 11.
[28] Wakisaka, M.; Mitsui, S.; Hirose, Y.; Kawashima, K.; Uchida, H.; Watanabe, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 23489.
[29] Zhu, C.; Hai, Y.; Zhao, Z. G.; Yang, Y. Y. Acta Chim. Sinica 2017, 76, 30. (in Chinese) (朱婵, 海洋, 赵志刚, 阳耀月, 化学学报, 2017, 76, 30.)
[30] Zhou, W.; Lee, J. Y. Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9, 1725.
[31] Maillard, F.; Savinova, E. R.; Stimming, U. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2007, 599, 221.
[32] Qin, Y. H.; Yang, H. H.; Zhang, X. S.; Li, P.; Zhou, X. G.; Niu, L.; Yuan, W. K. Carbon 2010, 48, 3323.
[33] Liang, Z. X.; Zhao, T. S.; Xu, J. B.; Zhu, L. D. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 2203
[34] Lebedeva, N. P.; Koper, M. T. M.; Feliu, J. M.; Van Santen, R. A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2002, 524, 242.
[35] McCallum, C.; Pletcher, D. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1976, 70, 277.
[36] Gilman, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 70.
[37] Suntivich, J.; Xu, Z.; Carlton, C. E.; Kim, J.; Han, B.; Lee, S. W.; Bonnet, N.; Marzari, N.; Allard, L. F.; Gasteiger, H. A.; Hamad-Schifferli, K.; Shao-Horn, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7985.
[38] Chen, G. L.; Chen, S. P.; Zhen, C. H.; Zhou, Z. Y.; Sun, S. G. Acta Chim. Sinica 2001, 59, 1253(in Chinese). (陈国良, 陈声培, 甄春花, 周志有, 孙世刚, 化学学报, 2001, 59, 1253.)
[39] Bayer, D.; Berenger, S.; Joos, M.; Cremers, C.; Tübke, J. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2010, 35, 12660.
[40] Teng, X. In Materials and Processes for Energy:Communicating Current Research and Technological Developments, Atrazhev, V. V.; Burlatsky, S. F., Formatex Research Center, Durham, 2013, pp. 473~484.
[41] Wang, S. Y.; Kristian, N.; Jiang, S. P.; Wang, X. Nanotechnology 2008, 20, 025605.
[42] Wang, H.; Jiang, K.; Chen, Q.; Xie, Z.; Cai, W. B. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 374.

Au-Pt催化剂的控制合成及其对乙醇电氧化性能

Controlled Synthesis of Gold-Platinum Catalysts for Ethanol Electro-oxidation Reaction

PDF

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

[1]	李珊, 路俊欣, 刘杰, 蒋绿齐, 易文斌. 氟烷基亚磺酸钠盐电化学合成α-氟烷基酮[J]. 化学学报, 2024, 82(2): 110-114.
[2]	刘建川, 李翠艳, 刘耀祖, 王钰杰, 方千荣. 高稳定二维联咔唑sp²碳共轭共价有机框架材料用于高效电催化氧还原^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(8): 884-890.
[3]	杨镇鸿, 干晓娟, 王书哲, 段君元, 翟天佑, 刘友文. 金属性Ni₃N纳米粒子的制备与乙二醇电氧化性能^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(11): 1471-1477.
[4]	闫绍兵, 焦龙, 何传新, 江海龙. ZIF-67/石墨烯复合物衍生的氮掺杂碳限域Co纳米颗粒用于高效电催化氧还原[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(8): 1084-1090.
[5]	何家伟, 焦柳, 程雪怡, 陈光海, 吴强, 王喜章, 杨立军, 胡征. 金属有机框架衍生的空心碳纳米笼的结构调控与锂硫电池性能研究[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(7): 896-902.
[6]	蒋银龙, 李国超, 陈青松, 徐忠宁, 林姗姗, 郭国聪. 富晶格位错的多孔铋纳米花高效电还原二氧化碳制甲酸盐^※[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(6): 703-707.
[7]	王丹, 封波, 张晓昕, 刘亚楠, 裴燕, 乔明华, 宗保宁. 基于热解ZIF-8的氮掺杂碳电化学氧还原合成过氧化氢催化剂[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(6): 772-780.
[8]	应霞薇, 浮建军, 曾敏, 刘文, 张天宇, 沈培康, 张信义. 基于BiOCl-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂介孔复合材料的光电化学合成氨性能研究[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(4): 503-509.
[9]	李泽洋, 杨宇森, 卫敏. 二氧化碳还原电催化剂的结构设计及性能研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(2): 199-213.
[10]	安攀, 张庆慧, 杨状, 武佳星, 张佳颖, 王雅君, 李宇明, 姜桂元. 双碳目标下太阳能制氢技术的研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(12): 1629-1642.
[11]	王金格, 周伟, 李佳轶, 丁雅妮, 高继慧. 脉冲电催化的研究进展及性能强化机制[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(11): 1555-1568.
[12]	穆春辉, 张艺馨, 寇伟, 徐联宾. 镍氮掺杂有序大孔/介孔碳负载银纳米颗粒用于高效电催化CO₂还原[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(7): 925-931.
[13]	孙冬, 孙博, 裴燕, 闫世润, 范康年, 乔明华, 张晓昕, 宗保宁. 壳层厚度对骨架Fe@HZSM-5核壳催化剂费托合成催化性能的影响[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(6): 771-777.
[14]	马一宁, 施润, 张铁锐. 三相界面电催化二氧化碳还原研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(4): 369-377.
[15]	詹溯, 章福祥. 常温常压电催化合成氨的研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(2): 146-157.