含氮杂环协助的醛胺缩合反应机理的研究

doi:10.6023/A19110413

化学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 78 ›› Issue (5): 437-443.DOI: 10.6023/A19110413 上一篇下一篇

研究论文

含氮杂环协助的醛胺缩合反应机理的研究

李哲伟, 王骞阅, 蒲敏, 杨作银, 雷鸣

北京化工大学化工资源有效利用国家重点实验室化学学院计算化学研究所北京 100029

投稿日期:2019-11-26 发布日期:2020-04-08
通讯作者: 蒲敏, 雷鸣 E-mail:pumin@mail.buct.edu.cn;leim@mail.buct.ed
基金资助:
项目受国家自然科学基金（No.21672018）、厦门大学固体表面物理化学国家重点实验室开放课题（No.201811）和中央高校基本科研专项资金项目（No.XK1802-6）资助.

Theoretical Study on Nitrogenous Heterocyclic Assisted Aldimine Condensation

Li Zhewei, Wang Qianyue, Pu Min, Yang Zuoyin, Lei Ming

State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, College of Chemistry, Institute of Computational Chemistry, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2019-11-26 Published:2020-04-08
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21672018), the State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces (Xiamen University) (No. 201811) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. XK1802-6).

文章分享

1. Supporting Information-A19110413.pdf(2718KB)

摘要/Abstract

采用密度泛函理论（DFT）方法研究了在酸性条件下对带有氮杂原子的伯胺与醛的缩合反应机理.研究结果表明，在酸性条件下，碱性更强的杂环氮比羰基氧更容易被质子化，杂环氮作为氢质子桥使缩合反应能垒大大降低，计算得到的反应能量跨度为13.08 kcal/mol.同时，将伯胺上含氮杂环上的N原子调变为P，As原子及改变N原子的位置后缩合反应能垒升高，证实了杂环氮原子协助氢转移的重要性，此理论研究为揭示含氮杂环伯胺与醛的缩合反应机理提供了新的思路与理论依据.

关键词: 含氮杂环, 伯胺, 胺醛缩合, 密度泛函理论, 氢转移

Imines and the intermediate methylamine by the aldimine condensation of primary amines with aldehydes have a potential application in the field of pharmacy, life science, catalysis, material science, etc. In this reaction, the hydrogen transfer in the dehydration step normally prefers the pathway via a water bridge in aqueous solution or a directly dehydration in organic solvent. It is a different mechanism for the aldimine condensation of amine owning neighbouring nitrogenous heterocycle. Herein we investigated the mechanism of aldimine condensation of primary amine containing nitrogenous heterocycle with aldehyde in dichloromethane under acidic conditions using density functional theory (DFT) at ωB97X-D/6-31++G(d,p) level, the calculated results show that compared with specific acid catalysis, the heterocyclic nitrogen with stronger basicity is easier to be protonated than the oxygen of carbonyl group. The whole reaction proceeds two hydrogen transfer steps via nitrogen bridge owning an energy span of 13.08 kcal/mol. The rate-determing step is the second hydrogen transfer step. In each step the heterocyclic nitrogen is a bridge to assist the hydrogen transfer, which could reduce the free energy barrier of the aldimine condensation. It is unfavorable for the reaction pathway via directly hydrogen transfer with a four-membered ring transition state owning a free energy barrier of 32.73 kcal/mol, and the reaction pathway via a water bridge is not located. Meanwhile, the energy barriers increased for systems in which the N atom in heterocycle of primary amine is replaced by P/As atoms. The rate-determining step changes from the second hydrogen transfer step for N system to the first hydrogen transfer step for As system. The position effect of adjacent nitrogen atom is also investigated. The γ position owns the highest reactivity of the aldimine condensation, which implies that the ring strain plays an important role in the aldimine condensation of primary amine containing nitrogenous heterocycle with aldehyde. This theoretical study may provide insights to unveil the nature of aldimine condensation of aldehyde and primary amine owning nitrogeneous heterocycle.

Key words: nitrogenous heterocycle, primary amine, aldimine condensation, DFT, hydrogen transfer

引用此文

李哲伟, 王骞阅, 蒲敏, 杨作银, 雷鸣. 含氮杂环协助的醛胺缩合反应机理的研究[J]. 化学学报, 2020, 78(5): 437-443.

Li Zhewei, Wang Qianyue, Pu Min, Yang Zuoyin, Lei Ming. Theoretical Study on Nitrogenous Heterocyclic Assisted Aldimine Condensation[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2020, 78(5): 437-443.

导出引用 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

分享此文

参考文献

[1] Schiff, H. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1864, 131, 118.
[2] Leth, L. A.; Naesborg, L.; Reyes-Rodriguez, G. J.; Tobiesen, H. N.; Iversen, M. V.; Jorgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 12687.
[3] Rezayee, N. M.; Lauridsen, V. H.; Naesborg, L.; Nguyen, T. V. Q.; Tobiesen, H. N.; Jorgensen, K. A. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 3586.
[4] Liu, Y.; Yue, X.; Luo, C.; Zhang, L.; Lei, M. Energy Environ. Mater. 2019, 2, 292.
[5] Stana, A.; Enache, A.; Vodnar, D. C.; Nastasa, C.; Benedec, D.; Ionut, I.; Login, C.; Marc, G.; Oniga, O.; Tiperciuc, B. Molecules 2016, 21, 1595.
[6] Hong, M.; Min, J.; Wang, S. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 38, 1907(in Chinese). (洪梅, 闵洁, 王石发, 有机化学, 2018, 38, 1907.)
[7] Li, Y.; Jia, F.; Ma, L.; Li, Z. Acta Chim. Sinica 2015, 73, 1311(in Chinese). (李远明, 贾凡, 马丽娜, 李志平, 化学学报, 2015, 73, 1311.)
[8] Hu, S.-B.; Chen, M.-W.; Zhai, X.-Y.; Zhou, Y.-G. Acta Chim. Sinica 2018, 76, 103(in Chinese). (胡书博, 陈木旺, 翟小勇, 周永贵, 化学学报, 2018, 76, 103.)
[9] Wang, H.; Huang, L. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 39, 883(in Chinese). (王辉, 黄龙江, 有机化学, 2019, 39, 883.)
[10] Xiao, M.; Yue, X.; Xu, R.; Tang, W.; Xue, D.; Li, C.; Lei, M.; Xiao, J.; Wang, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 10528.
[11] Santerre, G. M.; Hansrote, C. J.; Crowell, T. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1254.
[12] Martin, R. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 1369.
[13] Makela, M. J.; Korpela, T. K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1983, 12, 309.
[14] Jencks, W. P. Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. 1964, 2, 63.
[15] Hine, J.; Via, F. A.; Gotkis, J. K.; Craig, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5186.
[16] Sayer, J. M.; Pinsky, B.; Schonbrunn, A.; Washtien, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7998.
[17] Rosenberg, S.; Silver, S. M.; Sayer, J. M.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7986.
[18] Williams, I. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6299.
[19] Hall, N. E.; Smith, B. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 4930.
[20] Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 475.
[21] Jencks, W. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1976, 9, 425.
[22] Sayer, J. M.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 5637.
[23] Ding, Y. Q.; Cui, Y. Z.; Li, T. D. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 4252.
[24] Salva, A.; Donoso, J.; Frau, J.; Muñoz, F. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 9409.
[25] Ortega-Castro, J.; Adrover, M.; Frau, J.; Salva, A.; Donoso, J.; Muñoz, F. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 4634.
[26] Casasnovas, R.; Salvà, A.; Frau, J.; Donoso, J.; Muñoz, F. Chem. Phys. 2009, 355, 149.
[27] Solis-Calero, C.; Ortega-Castro, J.; Muñoz, F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 15879.
[28] Kirmizialtin, S.; Yildiz, B. S.; Yildiz, I. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2017, 30, 1.
[29] Ciaccia, M.; Di Stefano, S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 646.
[30] Hooley, R. J.; Iwasawa, T.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15330.
[31] Ciaccia, M.; Cacciapaglia, R.; Mencarelli, P.; Mandolini, L.; Di Stefano, S. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 2253.
[32] Chai, J.-D.; Head-Gordon, M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 6615.
[33] Marenich, A. V.; Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 6378.
[34] Hratchian, H. P.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 9918.
[35] Mayer, I. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1983, 97, 270.
[36] Wiberg, K. B. Tetrahedron 1968, 24, 1083.
[37] Lu, T.; Chen, F. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 580.
[38] Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Bloino, J.; Zheng, G.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Montgomery Jr., J. A.; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E.; Kudin, K. N.; Staroverov, V. N.; Keith, T.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A.; Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Millam, J. M.; Klene, M.; Knox, J. E.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Farkas, O.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cioslowski, J.; Fox, D. J. Gaussian 09, Revision B. 01. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, 2010.
[39] Legault, C. Y. CYLview, 1.0b, Université de Sherbrooke, 2009, http://www.cylview.org.

含氮杂环协助的醛胺缩合反应机理的研究

Theoretical Study on Nitrogenous Heterocyclic Assisted Aldimine Condensation

PDF

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

[1]	黄广龙, 薛小松. “陈试剂”作为三氟甲基源机理的理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2024, 82(2): 132-137.
[2]	梁雪峰, 荆剑, 冯昕, 赵勇泽, 唐新员, 何燕, 张立胜, 李慧芳. 共价有机框架COF66/COF366的电子结构: 从单体到二维平面聚合物[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(7): 717-724.
[3]	杨磊, 葛娇阳, 王访丽, 吴汪洋, 郑宗祥, 曹洪涛, 王洲, 冉雪芹, 解令海. 一种基于芴的大环结构的有效降低内重组能的理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(6): 613-619.
[4]	张少秦, 李美清, 周中军, 曲泽星. 多共振热激活延迟荧光过程的理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(2): 124-130.
[5]	王娟, 肖华敏, 谢丁, 郭元茹, 潘清江. 铜掺杂与氮化碳复合氧化锌材料结构和二氧化氮气体传感性质的密度泛函理论计算[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(11): 1493-1499.
[6]	刘金晶, 杨娜, 李莉, 魏子栋. 铂活性位空间结构调控氧还原机理的理论研究^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(11): 1478-1485.
[7]	栾雪菲, 王聪芝, 夏良树, 石伟群. 铀酰与羧酸和肟基类配体相互作用的理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(6): 708-713.
[8]	王珞聪, 李哲伟, 岳彩巍, 张培焕, 雷鸣, 蒲敏. 电场下偶氮苯衍生物分子顺反异构化反应机理的理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(6): 781-787.
[9]	熊昆, 陈伽瑶, 杨娜, 蒋尚坤, 李莉, 魏子栋. 理论探究水溶液条件对TMN_xC_y催化氮还原性能的增强机制[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(9): 1138-1145.
[10]	王英辉, 魏思敏, 段金伟, 王康. 理论研究“受阻路易斯酸碱对”催化的烯醇硅醚氢化反应机理[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(9): 1164-1172.
[11]	满清敏, 付尊蕴, 刘甜甜, 郑明月, 蒋华良. Cu催化偶联反应合成烷基芳基醚的DFT机理研究[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(7): 948-952.
[12]	王岩, 田英齐, 金钟, 索兵兵. 基于GPU的Hartree-Fock与密度泛函算法及程序[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(5): 653-657.
[13]	张丹琪, 邵英博, 郑汉良, 周碧莹, 薛小松. 双齿氮配体螯合五价碘试剂介导的苯酚氧化去芳构化机理的理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(11): 1394-1400.
[14]	宋梦迪, 刘莹, 李歆, 陆思华. 典型芳香烃大气氧化机理研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(10): 1214-1231.
[15]	于沫涵, 程媛媛, 刘亚军. 萤火虫生物发光中加氧反应机理的理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2020, 78(9): 989-993.