γ-Fe2O3纳米立方块修饰的Graphene/CdS复合光催化材料的合成及性能研究

doi:10.6023/A17050220

摘要/Abstract

利用普鲁士蓝（PB）作为γ-Fe₂O₃前驱体，先依次在氧化石墨烯（GO）片上负载PB和CdS纳米粒子，再将其置于惰性气体（N₂）氛围下进行煅烧，成功制备出CdS/RGO/γ-Fe₂O₃三元复合光催化剂.通过改变PB负载量可以得到不同γ-Fe₂O₃含量的三元光催化剂，且PB的方块状形貌在煅烧后得以保持.利用XRD、EDS、TEM、FT-IR、UV-vis等手段对所制备的样品进行组成、结构、形貌、光吸收等的分析表征，并以罗丹明B （RhB）为模拟污染物研究上述催化剂对有机污染物的光催化降解性能.与二元复合物CdS/RGO相比，三元CdS/RGO/γ-Fe₂O₃光催化剂表现出更强的可见光催化活性，这说明γ-Fe₂O₃在光催化过程中起了重要作用.而且，由于γ-Fe₂O₃具有铁磁性，在外加磁场的作用下可以将光催化剂从反应体系中快速分离回收.同时，还研究了CdS/RGO/γ-Fe₂O₃光催化剂的降解动力学过程，并通过光催化剂的荧光表征和活性基团捕获实验，提出了光催化降解的机理.

关键词: γ-Fe₂O₃, 石墨烯, CdS, 光催化, 机理

With Prussian blue (PB) as the precursor for γ-Fe₂O₃, the tri-component CdS/RGO/γ-Fe₂O₃ photocatalyst was prepared through loading PB nanocubes and CdS nanoparticles on graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets, followed by a calcination process in inert atmosphere (N₂). The content of γ-Fe₂O₃ in the CdS/RGO/γ-Fe₂O₃ photocatalyst can be adjusted by changing the loading amount of PB, and the cubic morphology of PB was maintained after the calcination. The composition, structure, morphology and light absorption of the as-prepared products were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), Raman spectroscopy and ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy. The photocatalytic activity of the ternary photocatalysts was evaluated by the degradation of the organic pollutant of Rhodamine B (RhB) under visible-light irradiation. It was found that the degradation process of RhB follows pseudo-first-order kinetics. Compared to the bi-component CdS/RGO photocatalyst, the tri-component CdS/RGO/γ-Fe₂O₃ exhibited greatly enhanced photocatalytic activity, demonstrating that the γ-Fe₂O₃ played an important role in the photocatalytic process. The CdS/RGO/γ-Fe₂O₃ composite with PB loading amount of 12 mg exhibits the highest photocatalytic degradation efficiency of about 99.8% and the highest apparent reaction rate constant (k) value of about 0.03289 min^-1, which is almost 2.9 times and 1.8 times higher than that of CdS and CdS/RGO, respectively. This result indicates that a suitable loading amount of γ-Fe₂O₃ is important to optimize the photocatalytic performance of the CdS/RGO/γ-Fe₂O₃ composites. Moreover, owing to the ferromagnetism of γ-Fe₂O₃, the CdS/RGO/γ-Fe₂O₃ photocatalyst could be easily separated from the reaction solution for recycling by a magnet. A possible photocatalytic mechanism was also proposed based on the photoluminescence (PL) characterization and the active species capture experiment. It was demonstrated that the enhanced photocatalytic degradation properties of CdS/RGO/γ-Fe₂O₃ composites can be ascribed to the excellent conductivity of RGO and the construction of Z-scheme heterostructure between CdS and γ-Fe₂O₃, which facilitate the transport and separation of photogenerated carriers.

Key words: γ-Fe₂O₃, graphene, CdS, photocatalysis, mechanism

引用此文

吴佳佳, 季振源, 沈小平, 缪绪立, 徐克强. γ-Fe₂O₃纳米立方块修饰的Graphene/CdS复合光催化材料的合成及性能研究[J]. 化学学报, 2017, 75(12): 1207-1214.

Wu Jiajia, Ji Zhenyuan, Shen Xiaoping, Miao Xuli, Xu Keqiang. Synthesis of γ-Fe₂O₃ Nanocubes Decorated Graphene/CdS Nanocomposites with Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance[J]. Acta Chim. Sinica, 2017, 75(12): 1207-1214.

导出引用 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

分享此文

参考文献

[1] Aarthi, T.; Narahari, P.; Madras, G. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 149, 725.
[2] Gu, S. H.; Wang, L. Z.; Zhang, J. L. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 153.
[3] Higashimoto, S.; Hikita, K.; Azuma, M. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 165.
[4] Wang, J. T.; Xiao, C.; Wu, X. Y. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 189.
[5] Li, X. D.; Zhang, Q. H.; Wang, H. Z. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 196.
[6] Qin, H. X.; Bian, Y. Y.; Zhang, Y. X. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 203.
[7] Cui, S. Z.; Yang, H. P.; Sun, H. H. Acta Chim. Sinica 2016, 74, 995. (崔素珍, 杨汉培, 孙慧华, 聂坤, 吴俊明, 化学学报, 2016, 74, 995.)
[8] Carey, J. H.; Lawrence, J.; Tosine, H. M. B. Environ. Contam. Tox. 1976, 16, 697.
[9] Wang, E. J.; Yang, H. Y.; Cao, Y. A. Acta Chim. Sinica 2009, 67, 2759(in Chinese). (王恩君, 杨辉云, 曹亚安, 化学学报, 2009, 67, 2759.)
[10] Bae, E.; Choi, W. Environ. Sci. Technol 2003, 37, 147.
[11] Wang, Y. W.; Zhu, Y. H.; Yang, X. L. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 949.
[12] Chang, J.; Zhang, W. J.; Hong, C. Y. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 1016.
[13] Jiang, L. P.; Wang, S. J.; Shi, L. Y. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 183.
[14] Cheng, J. S.; Wang, W. H.; Zhu, W. J. Chin. J. Chem. 2016, 34, 53.
[15] Wang, D. B.; Zhao, L. X.; Guo, L. H.; Zhang, H.; Wan, B.; Yang, Y. Acta Chim. Sinica 2015, 73, 388(in Chinese). (王大彬, 赵利霞, 郭良宏, 张辉, 万斌, 杨郁, 化学学报, 2015, 73, 388.)
[16] Bi, F.; Muhammad, F.; Liu, W. Chin. J. Chem. 2015, 33, 112.
[17] Abe, R.; Takata, T.; Sugihara, H. Chem. Commun. 2005, 30, 3829.
[18] Higashi, M.; Abe, R.; Teramura, K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 452, 120.
[19] Li, C. Q.; Luo, L. T.; Xiong, G. W. Acta Chim. Sinica 2010, 68, 1023(in Chinese). (李长全, 罗来涛, 熊光伟, 化学学报, 2010, 68, 1023.)
[20] Ba-Abbad, M. M.; Kadhum, A. A. H.; Mohamad, A. B. Int. J. Therm. Environ. Eng. 2010, 1, 37.
[21] Xie, Y. P.; Yu, Z. B.; Liu, G.; Ma, X. L.; Cheng, H. M. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1895.
[22] Zhang, N.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, X.; Yang, M. Q.; Xu, Y. J. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 18023.
[23] Ye, X. J.; Dai, X.; Meng, S. G. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 217.
[24] Kashiath, L.; Namratha, K.; Byrappa, K. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 695, 799.
[25] Lee, J.; Kim, Y.; Kim, J. K.; Kim, S.; Min, D.; Jang, D. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 205, 433.
[26] Khan, S.; Han, J. S.; Lee, S. Y. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 159.
[27] Cong, R. M.; Luo, Y. J.; Yu, H. Q. Acta Chim. Sinica 2012, 68, 1971(in Chinese). (丛日敏, 罗运军, 于怀清, 化学学报, 2012, 68, 1971.)
[28] Li, H. J.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, L.; Luo, W. J.; Xu, Q. F.; Wang, X. Y.; Xiao, M.; Zou, Z. G. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 11933.
[29] Vaquero, F.; Navarro, R. M.; Fierro, J. L. G. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 753.
[30] Li, Q.; Guo, B. D.; Yu, J. G.; Ran, J. R.; Zhang, B. H.; Yan, H. J.; Gong, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10878.
[31] Li, Y. G.; Wei, X. L.; Li, H. J.; Wang, R. R.; Feng, J.; Yun, H.; Zhou, A. N. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 14704.
[32] Liu, X. J.; Pan, L. K.; Lv, T.; Zhu, G.; Sun, Z.; Sun, C. Q. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 11984.
[33] Zhang, Y. H.; Tang, Z. R.; Fu, X. Z.; Xu, Y. J. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 7303.
[34] Zhang, N.; Yang, M. Q.; Liu, S. Q.; Sun, Y. G.; Xu, Y. J. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 10307.
[35] Quan, Q.; Lin, X.; Zhang, N.; Xu, Y. J. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 2398.
[36] Han, C.; Zhang, N.; Xu, Y. J. Nano Today 2016, 11, 351.
[37] Yuan, L.; Yang, M. Q.; Xu, Y. J. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 6335.
[38] Liu, Y.; Zhou, L.; Hu, Y.; Guo, C. F.; Qian, H. S.; Zhang, F. M.; Lou, X. W. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 18359.
[39] Li, N.; Zhang, J.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, J. H.; Zuo, W. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 308, 377.
[40] Chen, Y.; Liu, K. R. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 697, 161.
[41] Jia, X. H.; Dai, R. R.; Lian, D. D.; Han, S.; Wu, X. Y.; Song, H. J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 392, 268.
[42] Wang, L.; Wei, H. W.; Fan, Y. J.; Gu, X.; Zhan, J. H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 14119.
[43] Liu, Y.; Yu, L.; Hu, Y.; Guo, C. F.; Zhang, F. M.; Lou, X. W. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 183.
[44] Zhang, L.; Wu, H. B.; Madhavi, S.,; Hng, H. H.; Lou, X. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17388.
[45] He, H.; Klinowski, J.; Forster, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 287, 53.
[46] Singh, A. P.; Mishra, M.; Sambyal, P.; Gupta, B. K.; Singh, A.; Dhawan, S. K. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 3581.
[47] Meng, N. N.; Zhou, Y. F.; Nie, W. Y.; Chen, P. P. J. Nanopart. Res. 2016, 18, 241.
[48] Kudin, K. N.; Ozbas, B.; Schniepp, H. C. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 36.
[49] Sirivisoot, S.; Harrison, B. S. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2015, 10, 4447.
[50] Xu, J.; Wang, L.; Cao, X. J. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 283, 816.
[51] Jia, L.; Wang, D. H.; Huang, Y. X.; Xu, A. W.; Yu, H. Q. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 11466.
[52] Guo, R. Q.; Fang, L.; Dong, W.; Zheng, F. G.; Shen, M. R. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 18645.
[53] Mondal, S.; Sunhu, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Saha, S. K. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 27749.

γ-Fe₂O₃纳米立方块修饰的Graphene/CdS复合光催化材料的合成及性能研究

Synthesis of γ-Fe₂O₃ Nanocubes Decorated Graphene/CdS Nanocomposites with Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance

PDF

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

[1]	黄广龙, 薛小松. “陈试剂”作为三氟甲基源机理的理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2024, 82(2): 132-137.
[2]	李雅宁, 王晓艳, 唐勇. 自由基聚合的立体选择性调控^★[J]. 化学学报, 2024, 82(2): 213-225.
[3]	陈健强, 朱钢国, 吴劼. 镍催化氮杂环丙烷的开环偶联反应研究[J]. 化学学报, 2024, 82(2): 190-212.
[4]	吴宇晗, 张栋栋, 尹宏宇, 陈正男, 赵文, 匙玉华. “双碳”目标下Janus In₂S₂X光催化还原CO₂的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(9): 1148-1156.
[5]	付信朴, 王秀玲, 王伟伟, 司锐, 贾春江. 团簇Au/CeO₂的制备及其催化CO氧化反应构效关系的研究^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(8): 874-883.
[6]	崔国庆, 胡溢玚, 娄颖洁, 周明霞, 李宇明, 王雅君, 姜桂元, 徐春明. CO₂加氢制醇类催化剂的设计制备及性能研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(8): 1081-1100.
[7]	何明慧, 叶子秋, 林桂庆, 尹晟, 黄心翊, 周旭, 尹颖, 桂波, 汪成. 卟啉基共价有机框架的光催化研究进展^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(7): 784-792.
[8]	刘嘉文, 林玮璜, 王惟嘉, 郭学益, 杨英. Cu_1.94S-SnS纳米异质结的合成及其光催化降解研究[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(7): 725-734.
[9]	刘坜, 郑刚, 范国强, 杜洪光, 谭嘉靖. 4-酰基/氨基羰基/烷氧羰基取代汉斯酯参与的有机反应研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(6): 657-668.
[10]	李飞, 丁汇丽, 李超忠. 基于氟仿衍生的三氟甲基硼络合物参与的烯烃氢三氟甲基化反应[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(6): 577-581.
[11]	王俊, 许晓梅, 周姣龙, 赵雅男, 孙秀丽, 唐勇, 何素芳, 杨红梅. 新型无硫无磷醚-酯化合物的合成及其作为无灰摩擦改进剂的性能研究[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(5): 461-468.
[12]	徐袁利, 潘辉, 杨义, 左智伟. 连续流条件下蒽-铈协同催化的苄位碳氢键选择性氧化反应^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(5): 435-440.
[13]	齐学平, 王飞, 张健. 后合成法构筑钛基金属有机框架及其应用[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(5): 548-558.
[14]	刘祯钰, 甘利华. 乙炔热解为富勒烯的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(5): 502-510.
[15]	宁聪聪, 杨倩, 毛阿敏, 唐梓嘉, 金燕, 胡宝山. 石墨烯纳米带的可控制备研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(4): 406-419.