具有强大内建电场的C60@TpPa共价有机框架材料高效光催化产氢

doi:10.6023/A25100352

化学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 84 ›› Issue (3): 370-376.DOI: 10.6023/A25100352 上一篇下一篇

研究论文

具有强大内建电场的C₆₀@TpPa共价有机框架材料高效光催化产氢

宋玉朋^a^,^c, 华紫辉^b^,^c, 葛介超^a^,^c, 王春儒^b^,^c, 吴波^b^,^c^,^d^,^*()

^a 中国科学院理化技术研究所中国科学院光化学转化与功能器件重点实验室北京 100190
^b 中国科学院化学研究所北京分子科学国家研究中心分子纳米结构与纳米技术重点实验室北京 100190
^c 中国科学院大学北京 100049
^d 中国科学院化学研究所碳中和化学中心北京 100190

投稿日期:2025-10-23 发布日期:2026-02-03
通讯作者: 吴波
基金资助:
项目受国家自然科学基金(52322204); 项目受国家自然科学基金(52072374); 国家重点研发计划(2022YFA1205900); 以及中国科学院青年创新促进会(Y2022015)

C₆₀@TpPa Covalent Organic Framework with Strong Built-In Electric Field Enables Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production

Song Yupeng^a^,^c, Hua Zihui^b^,^c, Ge Jiechao^a^,^c, Wang Chunru^b^,^c, Wu Bo^b^,^c^,^d^,^*()

^a Key Laboratory of Photochemical Conversion and Optoelectronic Materials, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
^b Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Key Laboratory of Molecular Nanostructure and Nanotechnology, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
^c University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
^d Center for Carbon Neutral Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2025-10-23 Published:2026-02-03
Contact: Wu Bo
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52322204); National Natural Science Foundation of China(52072374); National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFA1205900); Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS(Y2022015)

文章分享

1. Supporting Information-A25100352.pdf(7770KB)

摘要/Abstract

共价有机框架(COFs), 兼具可设计性、比表面积大和能带可调性, 近年来逐渐受到了研究者的青睐. 但其COFs存在光生电荷快速复合以及电子传递路径受限的问题, 限制了其光催化产氢的应用. 构建强大内建电场促进高效电荷分离与传输是提升光催化剂性能的关键. 本工作通过利用一种具有β-酮烯胺连接的甲基COFs孔内嵌入富勒烯C₆₀成功制备了一种C₆₀@TpPa-(CH₃)₂-COF光催化剂. 结果表明, 与未封装C₆₀的COF相比, 封装C₆₀后内建电场强度提升了4.32倍, 极大促进了电荷分离与传输. 优化后的C₆₀@TpPa-(CH₃)₂-COF在全光谱条件下的产氢速率高达61.58 mmol• g^－1•h^－1. 本研究为构筑高效COF基光催化剂提供了新策略.

关键词: 富勒烯, 共价有机框架, 内建电场, 电荷分离, 光催化产氢

Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution has emerged as a promising strategy for generating clean fuel. Covalent organic framework (COFs), which possess designability, large specific surface area and adjustable energy band, have gradually gained favor among researchers in recent years. However, their hydrogen-evolution activity is often restricted by rapid carrier recombination and limited electron transfer pathways. Although various strategies such as heterojunction construction or skeletal functionalization have been explored, they often involve complex chemical modifications that may compromise the crystallinity. In contrast, the host-guest assembly strategy offers a mild route to modulate optoelectronic properties without destroying the intrinsic porous structure. Here we report a C₆₀@TpPa-(CH₃)₂-COF composite with a markedly reinforced internal electric field (IEF) to increase the hydrogen-evolution rate. C₆₀ was selected as the guest due to its high electron affinity and size compatibility with the COF pores, acting as an ideal electron acceptor. The TpPa-(CH₃)₂-COF was synthesized via Schiff-base polycondensation between 2,4,6-triformylphloroglucinol (Tp) and 2,5-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine (Pa-(CH₃)₂) in a 1∶1.5 molar ratio, using mesitylene and benzyl alcohol as solvents, with anhydrous acetic acid as a catalyst. The reaction mixture underwent freeze-pump-thaw cycles under vacuum before being sealed and heated at 120 ℃ for 72 h. After cooling, the product was filtered, washed with anhydrous THF, soaked in dry acetone for solvent exchange, and vacuum-dried at 120 ℃ for 12 h to obtain TpPa-(CH₃)₂-COF. For C₆₀ encapsulation, 20 mg of the COF was added to a 5 mL saturated C₆₀ solution in o-dichlorobenzene and heated at 60 ℃ for 3 d. After cooling, the composite was filtered, washed with warm o-DCB to remove physiosorbed C₆₀, and further washed with ethanol. The final product, C₆₀@TpPa-(CH₃)₂-COF, was vacuum-dried at 60 ℃ for 12 h. Comprehensive characterization confirms both framework formation and successful loading of C₆₀. Powder X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy verify retention of the ordered lattice together with signatures of the guest fullerene. The IEF in C₆₀@TpPa-(CH₃)₂-COF is 4.32-fold higher than that of the pristine COF, which promotes spatial charge separation and transport. Complementary calculations indicate that pore-confined C₆₀ induces an uneven charge distribution and increase the polarity, thereby amplifying the IEF. Consequently, under AM 1.5 irradiation and loading 1% (w) of Pt, the optimized material delivers a hydrogen-evolution rate of 61.58 mmol•g^－1•h^－1. This performance represents a 5.63-fold enhancement compared to the pristine COF, and the apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) reaches 4.04% at 450 nm. At the same time, the photocatalyst demonstrated excellent cyclic stability and there had no obvious changes occurred in the structure after 24 h cyclic testing. In short, this approach utilizes the host-guest electronic interactions to enhance the strength of internal electric fields, offering a general and efficient route to high-performance COF-based photocatalysts for solar hydrogen production.

Key words: fullerenes, covalent organic framework, built-in electric field, charge separation, photocatalytic hydrogen production

引用此文

宋玉朋, 华紫辉, 葛介超, 王春儒, 吴波. 具有强大内建电场的C₆₀@TpPa共价有机框架材料高效光催化产氢[J]. 化学学报, 2026, 84(3): 370-376.

Song Yupeng, Hua Zihui, Ge Jiechao, Wang Chunru, Wu Bo. C₆₀@TpPa Covalent Organic Framework with Strong Built-In Electric Field Enables Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2026, 84(3): 370-376.

导出引用 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

分享此文

图/表 5

图1. (a) C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF合成示意图. (b) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF的透射电子显微镜图像. (c) C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF的透射电子显微镜图像. (d) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF、C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF和C60的粉末X-射线衍射图谱对比

Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration for the synthesis of C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF. The TEM images of (b) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and (c) C60@TpPa-(CH3)2- COF. (d) Comparison of powder XRD Patterns for TpPa-(CH3)2-COF, C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60

图2. (a) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF和C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF的吸附-解吸等温线(77 K). (b) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF和C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF的孔径分布. (c) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF和C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF傅里叶变换红外光谱. (d) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF, C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF和C60的拉曼图谱

Figure 2. (a) Adsorption-desorption isotherms (77 K) and (b) pore size distributions of TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF. (c) Fourier transform infrared spectra of TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF. (d) Raman spectra of TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60

图3. (a) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF和C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF紫外-可见漫反射光谱对比. (b) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF和(c) C60@TpPa-(CH3)2的莫特-肖特基图谱. (d) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF和C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF的价带和导带能级图

Figure 3. (a) Comparison of UV-visible diffuse reflection spectra of TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF. Mott-Schottky plots of (b) TpPa- (CH3)2-COF and (c) C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF. (d) Valence and conduction band energy level diagrams for TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF

图4. (a) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF与C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF的光电流密度对比图. (b) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF与C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF的表面光电压(SPV)对比图. (c) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF与C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF的内建电场强度对比图. (d) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF与C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF的电化学阻抗谱对比图. (e) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF和C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF的静电势分布

Figure 4. (a) Photocurrent density comparison of TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF. (b) Surface photovoltage (SPV) comparison of TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF. (c) The internal electric field intensity comparison of TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF. (d) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy comparison of TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF. (e) The ESP of TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF

图5. (a) 全光谱光下C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF光催化析氢效率. (b) TpPa-(CH3)2-COF和C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF产氢能力对比. (c) C60@TpPa-(CH3)2- COF的AQE与SPV叠加曲线. (d) C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF产氢循环稳定性

Figure 5. (a) The photocatalytic hydrogen evolution of C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF with time under full-spectrum light. (b) Comparison of hydrogen-producing capacity of TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF. (c) Overlayer curve of AQE and SPV of C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF and (d) hydrogen-producing cycle stability of C60@TpPa-(CH3)2-COF

参考文献 36

[13]	Luo X.; Chen Y.; Lin J.-T.; Luo J.; Xia R.-Q.; Yin N.; Lin Y.-M.; Duan H.; Ren S.-B.; Gao Q.; Ning G.-H.; Li D. Chin. J. Chem. 2025, 43, 1199.
[14]	Huang X.; Guo J. Chin. J. Chem. 2024, 42, 2621.
[15]	Chen Z.; Jiang J.; Jing M.; Bai Y.; Zhang X.; Deng W.; Wu Y.; Chen F.; Yi M.; Yang M.; Xu X.; Wu T.; Zhang Y.; Wang X. Carbon Neutralization 2024, 3, 689.
[16]	Luo X.; Luo J.; Lin J.-T.; Ning G.-H.; Li D. The Innovation Materials 2024, 2, 100087.
[17]	Liu Y.-H.; Chu X.; Jiang Y.; Han W.; Wang Y.; Shao L.-H.; Zhang G.; Zhang F.-M. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2316546.
[18]	Luo Z.; Zhu S.; Xue H.; Yang W.; Zhang F.; Xu F.; Lin W.; Wang H.; Chen X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202420217.
[19]	Li J.; Zhou J.; Wang X.-H.; Guo C.; Li R.-H.; Zhuang H.; Feng W.; Hua Y.; Lan Y.-Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202411721.
[20]	Zhang M.; Lu M.; Lang Z.-L.; Liu J.; Liu M.; Chang J.-N.; Li L.-Y.; Shang L.-J.; Wang M.; Li S.-L.; Lan Y.-Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 6500.
[21]	Jiang Y.; Wang C.; Dong T.; Song Y.; Wang T.; Che H.; Sheng H.; Wu B.; Wang C. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, 2505161.
[22]	Wang C.; Wu B.; Li Y.; Dong T.; Chai Y.; Zhang Y.; Wang C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202300377.
[23]	Wang C.; Wu B.; Wang C. Acc. Mater. Res. 2024, 5, 426.
[24]	Song Y.; Wang C.; Jiang Y.; Hua Z.; Dong T.; Liu R.; Wen R.; Ge J.; Wang C.; Wu B. Carbon Energy 2025, 7, e70000.
[1]	Xu Q.; Zhang L.; Cheng B.; Fan J.; Yu J. Chem 2020, 6, 1543.
[2]	Wang Y.; Vogel A.; Sachs M.; Sprick R. S.; Wilbraham L.; Moniz S. J. A.; Godin R.; Zwijnenburg M. A.; Durrant J. R.; Cooper A. I.; Tang J. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 746.
[3]	Banerjee T.; Podjaski F.; Kröger J.; Biswal B. P.; Lotsch B. V. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 168.
[4]	Chen M.; Zhang B.; Wei T.; Sun Z.; Feng Y.; Zhang B. Acta Chim. Sinica 2025, 83, 93 (in Chinese).
	(陈铭晖, 张博心, 魏滔, 孙兆雪, 冯亚青, 张宝, 化学学报, 2025, 83, 93.)
[5]	Pati P. B.; Damas G.; Tian L.; Fernandes D. L. A.; Zhang L.; Pehlivan I. B.; Edvinsson T.; Araujo C. M.; Tian H. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 1372.
[6]	Lu L.; Wu B.; Shi W.; Cheng P. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2019, 6, 3456.
[7]	Wang X.; Chen L.; Chong S. Y.; Little M. A.; Wu Y.; Zhu W.-H.; Clowes R.; Yan Y.; Zwijnenburg M. A.; Sprick R. S.; Cooper A. I. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 1180.
[25]	Hua Z.; Wu B.; Zhang Y.; Wang C.; Dong T.; Song Y.; Jiang Y.; Wang C. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 256.
[26]	Wang Z.; Meng H.; Liu X.; Wu N.; Yang L.; Wu B.; Li G.; Liu Q.; Li J.; Ge J.; Wang C. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 521, 166299.
[27]	Guo M.; Meng Q.; Chen W.; Meng Z.; Gao M.-L.; Li Q.; Duan X.; Jiang H.-L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202305212.
[28]	Liu L.; Meng H.; Chai Y.; Chen X.; Xu J.; Liu X.; Liu W.; Guldi D. M.; Zhu Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202217897.
[29]	He Y.-O.; Fu Y.-M.; Meng X.; Xue L.; Yang R.-G.; Qu J.-X.; Su Z.-M.; Wang H.-N. Appl. Catal., A 2023, 663, 119320.
[30]	Kandambeth S.; Mallick A.; Lukose B.; Mane M. V.; Heine T.; Banerjee R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 19524.
[8]	Zhou Q.; Guo Y.; Zhu Y. Nat. Catal. 2023, 6, 574.
[9]	Yan S.; Liu W.; Duan F.; Chen M.; Dong W.; Lu S.; Du M. Acta Chim. Sinica 2025, 83, 685 (in Chinese).
	(闫生荣, 刘文浩, 段芳, 陈明清, 东为富, 陆双龙, 杜明亮, 化学学报, 2025, 83, 685.)
[10]	Jing J.; Yang J.; Zhang Z.; Zhu Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101392.
[11]	Li X.-L.; Wang Y.-B.; Wang Y.; Zhang R.-Z.; Dong R.-Z.; Liu H.; Yu S.; Han N.; Xing L.-B. Carbon Neutralization 2023, 2, 689.
[12]	Mishra B.; Alam A.; Chakraborty A.; Kumbhakar B.; Ghosh S.; Pachfule P.; Thomas A. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2413118.
[31]	Yin L.; Zhao Y.; Xing Y.; Tan H.; Lang Z.; Ho W.; Wang Y.; Li Y. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 419, 129984.
[32]	Zhang Y.; Yang T.; Li J.; Zhang Q.; Li B.; Gao M. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2210939.
[33]	Zhou E.; Zhang X.; Zhu L.; Chai E.; Chen J.; Li J.; Yuan D.; Kang L.; Sun Q.; Wang Y. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadk8564.
[34]	Yang S.; Sa R.; Zhong H.; Lv H.; Yuan D.; Wang R. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2110694.
[35]	Guo Y.; Zhou Q.; Nan J.; Shi W.; Cui F.; Zhu Y. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2067.
[36]	Chen X.; Wang J.; Chai Y.; Zhang Z.; Zhu Y. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2007479.

具有强大内建电场的C₆₀@TpPa共价有机框架材料高效光催化产氢

C₆₀@TpPa Covalent Organic Framework with Strong Built-In Electric Field Enables Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production

RichHTML

PDF

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

图/表 5

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

[1]	彭天资, 沈嘉克, 郭淑雅, 夏潇潇, 李炜. 迁移学习预测金属/共价有机骨架材料内小分子气体自扩散系数研究[J]. 化学学报, 2026, 84(3): 305-315.
[2]	闫生荣, 刘文浩, 段芳, 陈明清, 东为富, 陆双龙, 杜明亮. 基于sp²-碳连接具有D-A结构共价有机框架的构筑及其光催化产双氧水性能研究[J]. 化学学报, 2025, 83(7): 685-693.
[3]	王佳雨, 赵文娟, 贾宏宇, 刘永博, 张敏, 董龙龙, 张安杰, 王锐. 铜配位三维共价有机框架提升电催化硝酸盐还原制氨[J]. 化学学报, 2025, 83(12): 1507-1513.
[4]	班渺寒, 双亚洲, 杨安平, 郑长勇, 张伟, 徐飞. 共价有机框架的设计及质子传导性能研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2025, 83(11): 1435-1540.
[5]	晋圣林, 韩昌志, 张崇, 胡道道, 杨奔, 蒋加兴. 呋喃基D-π-A型线性共轭聚合物的合成与光催化产氢性能研究[J]. 化学学报, 2025, 83(10): 1150-1156.
[6]	李澄秋, 余嘉俊, 冯霄. 共价有机框架作为质子导体的研究进展^★[J]. 化学学报, 2025, 83(10): 1223-1236.
[7]	魏颖, 王家成, 李玥, 汪涛, 马述威, 解令海. 碳碳键链接的二维共价有机框架研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2024, 82(1): 75-102.
[8]	刘建川, 李翠艳, 刘耀祖, 王钰杰, 方千荣. 高稳定二维联咔唑sp²碳共轭共价有机框架材料用于高效电催化氧还原^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(8): 884-890.
[9]	杨蓉婕, 周璘, 苏彬. 基于共价有机框架修饰电极的维生素A和C的选择性检测^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(8): 920-927.
[10]	何明慧, 叶子秋, 林桂庆, 尹晟, 黄心翊, 周旭, 尹颖, 桂波, 汪成. 卟啉基共价有机框架的光催化研究进展^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(7): 784-792.
[11]	刘祯钰, 甘利华. 乙炔热解为富勒烯的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(5): 502-510.
[12]	陈俊畅, 张明星, 王殳凹. 晶态多孔材料合成方法的研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(2): 146-157.
[13]	眭玉光, 周锦荣, 廖攀, 梁文杰, 徐海. 巨型给-受体分子开关化合物的合成及性质研究[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(8): 1061-1065.
[14]	邱玲, 梁家艺, 张竹霞, 王太山. ¹⁵N同位素标记的金属氮化物内嵌富勒烯的合成与表征[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(7): 874-878.
[15]	林文源, 朱清哲, 马云龙, 王鹏, 万硕, 郑庆东. 理性调控聚合物给体-非富勒烯受体的混溶性制备高效率有机太阳能电池^※[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(6): 724-733.