TiO2纳米酶絮凝动力学

doi:10.6023/A12030054

化学学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 70 ›› Issue (21): 2226-2231.DOI: 10.6023/A12030054 上一篇下一篇

研究论文

TiO₂纳米酶絮凝动力学

王芬, 吴敏, 秦艳涛, 苗春存, 周少红, 倪恨美, 孙岳明

东南大学化学化工学院南京 211189

投稿日期:2012-03-25 发布日期:2012-09-11
通讯作者: 吴敏 E-mail:wuminnj@sohu.com
基金资助:
项目受国家自然科学基金(No. 51073035)和江苏省教育厅高校科研成果产业化推进项目(No. JHB2011-2)资助.

Flocculation Kinetics of TiO₂-enzyme Microfloccules

Wang Fen, Wu Min, Qin Yantao, Miao Chuncun, Zhou Shaohong, Ni Henmei, Sun Yueming

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189

Received:2012-03-25 Published:2012-09-11
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51073035), and Educational Commission of Jiangsu Province (No. JHB2011-2).

文章分享

摘要/Abstract

以聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)为絮凝剂, 纳米TiO₂为固定化酶载体材料, 木瓜蛋白酶为酶模型制备纳米絮凝酶. 结合粒度分析、SEM、EDS等表征手段, 考察PAM种类、加量及体系pH对高分子凝胶絮凝与沉降动力学的影响. 结果表明通过氢键、静电吸附和架桥等作用, 纳米酶和PAM间产生有效的絮凝. TiO₂纳米酶的絮凝沉降速度、体系浊度、絮团大小和紧实程度随PAM用量不同而改变. 适量的PAM产生高沉降速度, 低浊度, 稳定、大絮团的强絮凝, 其中nPAM絮凝酶的沉降速度最快, 絮团最大. 过量的絮凝剂导致絮团脱稳. 调控体系酸碱度亦可有效调控PAM絮凝动力学行为. 比较nPAM和cPAM, 发现nPAM絮凝体对pH有较高稳定性, cPAM絮凝体受pH影响显著. 故可以根据酶结构与特性, 调节絮凝剂加量和体系酸碱度设计出微纳尺度可调的固定化酶.

关键词: 絮凝动力学, 沉降速度, 粒度分布, 纳米TiO₂, 形貌

TiO₂-enzyme microfloccules were prepared by using titanium dioxide nanoparticles as immobilizing carriers, three kinds of polyacrylamide (nonionic, cationic and anionic polyacrylamide) as flocculants and papain as a model of enzyme. The effects of pH values, dosage and types of polyacrylamide (PAM) on the flocculation and sedimentation behaviour of TiO₂-enzyme microfloccules were investigated. The SEM, EDS and particle size analyzer were used to characterize the morphology of TiO₂-enzyme microfloccules. The results showed that an effective flocculation was formed among TiO₂, papain and different types of PAM flocculant by hydrogen bonding interactions, electrostatic attractions, adsorption bridging action, etc. It was noted that the settling rate of TiO₂-enzyme microfloccules, turbidity of the supernatant, floc size and compactness of resulting floccules were highly dependent on the PAM dosage. For three kinds of PAM, similar trends of flocculation kinetics were observed, a general increase in settling rates were relevant to decrease in turbidity. Attributed to high settling rates, strong flocculation with big size and stable floc occurred with the function of optimum PAM concentrations. But the optimum dosages were different. When the concentration was in the range of 75 mg稬^-1 to 175 mg稬^-1, nonionic PAM (nPAM) displayed the best flocculant performance in all kinds of PAM with a rapid settling rate and large floc size. Moreover, under excessive dosage condition, breakup of floc then occurred. Flocculation kinetics of TiO₂-enzyme microfloccules also could be effectively controlled by changing the pH value of reaction system. Compared nPAM with cationic PAM (cPAM), the microfloccules by using nPAM displayed a high stability and compactness in a wide range of pH values. The settling rate and floc size by using cPAM showed a strong dependence on pH values. It indicated that the immobilized enzyme size could be regulated by the PAM dosage and pH value according to the enzyme structure and properties. Such porous and flexible microstructure was expected to provide the free space as much as possible for the access of substrate molecules to enzyme.

Key words: flocculation kinetics, settling rate, particle size distribution, nano TiO₂, morphology

引用此文

王芬, 吴敏, 秦艳涛, 苗春存, 周少红, 倪恨美, 孙岳明. TiO₂纳米酶絮凝动力学[J]. 化学学报, 2012, 70(21): 2226-2231.

Wang Fen, Wu Min, Qin Yantao, Miao Chuncun, Zhou Shaohong, Ni Henmei, Sun Yueming. Flocculation Kinetics of TiO₂-enzyme Microfloccules[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2012, 70(21): 2226-2231.

导出引用 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

分享此文

参考文献

[1] Liao, H.-D.; Yuan, L.; Tong, C.-Y.; Zhu, Y.-H.; Li, D.; Liu, X.-M. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2008, 29(8), 1564. (廖红东, 袁丽, 童春义, 朱咏华, 李杜, 刘选明, 高等学校化学学报, 2008, 29(8), 1564.)
[2] Hermann, B. G.; Patel, M. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2007, 136, 361.
[3] Wu, M.; He, Q.; Shao, Q. F.; Zuo, Y. G.; Wang, F.; Ni, H. M. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 3300.
[4] Jiang, Y. J.; Gao, Q. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 716.
[5] Zong, J.; Chen, Y.-W.; Zhu, S.-M.; Wang, A.-M.; Shen, S.-B.; Ouyang, P.-K. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2006, 57(8), 1776. (宗璟, 陈英文, 祝社民, 王安明, 沈树宝, 欧阳平凯, 化工学报, 2006, 57(8), 1776.)
[6] Chen, S. H.; Yen, Y. H.; Wang, C. L.; Wang, S. L. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2003, 33, 643.
[7] Kim, J.; Grate, J. W. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1219.
[8] Vertegel, A.; Siegel, R.; Dordick, J. Langmuir 2004, 20, 6800.
[9] Wang, Z.-J.; Li, X.; Wang, C.-C.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, Y.-H. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2011, 32, 753. (王周俊, 李翔, 王琛琛, 唐颐, 张亚红, 高等学校化学学报, 2011, 32, 753.)
[10] Yan, M.; Ge, J.; Liu, Z.; Ouyang, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11008.
[11] Kim, J. B.; Grate, J. W.; Wang, P. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 26(11), 639.
[12] Wang, P. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2006, 17, 574.
[13] Hu, R.-Q.; Yu, J.-B.; Song, F.-B.; Xia, C.-T.; Li, Q.-Z. Acta Chim. Sinica 2000, 58, 1211. (胡仁其, 于家波, 宋富兵, 夏春镗, 李全芝, 化学学报, 2000, 58, 1211.)
[14] Liu, W. F.; Zhang, S. P.; Wang, P. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 139, 102.
[15] Jia, H. F.; Zhu, G. Y.; Wang, P. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 84, 406.
[16] Wu, M.; He, Q.; Zuo, Y.-G.; Wang, F.; Sun, Y.-M. Acta Chim. Sinica 2011, 69, 1475. (吴敏, 何琴, 左勇刚, 王芬, 孙岳明, 化学学报, 2011, 69, 1475.)
[17] Lu, C.-X.; Du, Z.-W.; Li, H.-R. Acta Chim. Sinica 2009, 67(3), 238. (卢翠香, 杜竹玮, 李浩然, 化学学报, 2009, 67(3), 238.)
[18] Xu, X. J. The Principle of Chemical Flocculant, Science Press, Beijing, 2005, pp. 74～76.
[19] Nasser, M. S.; James, A. E. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 52, 241.
[20] Solberg, D.; Wagberg, L. Colloids Surf. A 2003, 219, 161.
[21] Taylor, M. L.; Morris, G. E.; Self, P. G.; Smart, R. S. C. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 250, 28.
[22] Qiu, Y.-L.; Chen, H.-L.; Wang, X.-Z.; Xu, N.-P. J. Chem. Eng. Chin. Univ. 2005, 19, 129. (丘永樑, 陈洪龄, 汪效祖, 徐南平, 高校化学工程学报, 2005, 19, 129.)
[23] Sahoo, B.; Sahu, S. K.; Bhattacharya, D.; Dhara, D.; Pramanik, P. Colloids Surf. B 2013, 101, 280.
[24] Chu, R. H.; Yan, J. C.; Lian, S. Y.; Wang, Y. H.; Yan, F. C.; Chen, D. W. Solid State Commun. 2004, 130, 789.

TiO₂纳米酶絮凝动力学

Flocculation Kinetics of TiO₂-enzyme Microfloccules

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

[1]	刘彦甫, 李世麟, 荆亚楠, 肖林格, 周惠琼. 有机太阳能电池性能衰减机理研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(7): 993-1009.
[2]	Jamshid Kadirkhanov, 钟峰, 张文建, 洪春雁. 聚合诱导自组装制备多腔室囊泡以及成核链段中亲溶剂片段的影响[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(7): 913-920.
[3]	苗俊辉, 丁自成, 刘俊, 王利祥. 小分子给体/高分子受体型有机太阳能电池研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(5): 545-556.
[4]	张宇, 王世兴, 杨蕊, 戴腾远, 张楠, 席聘贤, 严纯华. Co₉S₈/MoS₂异质结构的构筑及电催化析氢性能研究[J]. 化学学报, 2020, 78(12): 1455-1460.
[5]	陈甜, 杨英, 赵婉玉, 潘德群, 朱从潭, 林飞宇, 郭学益. 溶剂热法制备纳米氧化镍及其表征[J]. 化学学报, 2019, 77(5): 447-454.
[6]	马慧, 马巍, 杨哲曜, 丁志峰, 龙亿涛. 纳米电极稳态电流表征的探讨[J]. 化学学报, 2017, 75(11): 1082-1086.
[7]	程沛, 史钦钦, 占肖卫. 基于聚合物给体/有机小分子/富勒烯受体的三元共混有机太阳能电池[J]. 化学学报, 2015, 73(3): 252-256.
[8]	薛启帆, 孙辰, 胡志诚, 黄飞, 叶轩立, 曹镛. 钙钛矿太阳电池研究进展:薄膜形貌控制与界面工程[J]. 化学学报, 2015, 73(3): 179-192.
[9]	邵志鹏, 潘旭, 张旭辉, 叶加久, 朱梁正, 李毅, 马艳梅, 黄阳, 朱俊, 胡林华, 孔凡太, 戴松元. 薄膜结构及形貌对钙钛矿电池性能的影响[J]. 化学学报, 2015, 73(3): 267-271.
[10]	张亚清, 唐黎明, 李麒. 基于单独MBA凝胶纤维的RAFT聚合制备聚合物微米管[J]. 化学学报, 2015, 73(2): 126-130.
[11]	万洋, 郑荞佶, 赁敦敏. 锂离子电池正极材料磷酸锰锂研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2014, 72(5): 537-551.
[12]	黄国勇, 徐盛明, 王俊莲, 李林艳, 王学军. 锂离子电池负极材料用Co₃O₄及其复合材料研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2013, 71(12): 1589-1597.
[13]	张永龙, 胡学步, 徐云兰, 丁明亮. 不同形貌结构Li₄Ti₅O₁₂负极材料的最新进展[J]. 化学学报, 2013, 71(10): 1341-1353.
[14]	杨慧, 彭娟, 邱枫. PI-b-P2VP两嵌段共聚物环状形貌的影响因素研究[J]. 化学学报, 2013, 71(08): 1141-1148.
[15]	张晓晴, 曾美桂, 李淑萍. 不同溶剂对甲氨蝶呤/类水滑石复合物性质的影响[J]. 化学学报, 2013, 71(02): 246-254.