卟啉基共价有机框架的光催化研究进展★

doi:10.6023/A23040178

化学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 81 ›› Issue (7): 784-792.DOI: 10.6023/A23040178 上一篇下一篇

所属专题：庆祝《化学学报》创刊90周年合辑

研究展望

卟啉基共价有机框架的光催化研究进展^★

何明慧, 叶子秋, 林桂庆, 尹晟, 黄心翊, 周旭, 尹颖, 桂波, 汪成^*()

武汉大学化学与分子科学学院武汉 430072

投稿日期:2023-04-28 发布日期:2023-06-05

作者简介:

何明慧, 硕士毕业于浙江师范大学, 现为武汉大学化学与分子科学学院博士生, 目前研究方向为共价有机框架的构筑及其催化性能的探究.

汪成, 2003年获武汉大学学士学位, 2008年在中国科学院化学研究所获理学博士学位, 随后在美国西北大学化学系进行博士后研究. 2012年4月加入武汉大学化学与分子科学学院, 任教授、博士生导师. 2013年被聘为湖北省“楚天学者”特聘教授, 2015年获得湖北省杰出青年基金资助, 2019年入选第四批“万人计划”青年拔尖人才, 2022年获国家杰出青年科学基金资助, 任Chinese Journal of Chemistry编委、中国化学会超分子化学专业委员会委员、中国化学会晶体化学专业委员会委员. 主要从事共价有机框架(COFs)的研究.

^★庆祝《化学学报》创刊90周年.

基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(22225503); 国家自然科学基金(U21A20285)

Research Progress of Porphyrin-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks in Photocatalysis^★

Minghui He, Ziqiu Ye, Guiqing Lin, Sheng Yin, Xinyi Huang, Xu Zhou, Ying Yin, Bo Gui, Cheng Wang()

College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

Received:2023-04-28 Published:2023-06-05
Contact: *E-mail: chengwang@whu.edu.cn
About author:
^★Dedicated to the 90th anniversary of Acta Chimica Sinica.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(22225503); National Natural Science Foundation of China(U21A20285)

文章分享

摘要/Abstract

共价有机框架(COFs)因其比表面积大、稳定性高和可设计性强等优点而引起了人们的广泛关注. 卟啉是一种具有大π共轭体系、易于修饰和良好吸光性能的功能基元. 卟啉基COFs吸光范围广, 活性位点多, 电子-空穴分离能力强, 在光催化领域应用广泛. 综述了卟啉基COFs在光催化还原二氧化碳、光催化分解水、光催化有机转化和光催化还原六价铀的研究进展, 最后讨论了卟啉基COFs在光催化领域的前景和面临的挑战.

关键词: 共价有机框架, 卟啉, 光催化

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are a class of crystalline organic porous materials formed by molecular building blocks via covalent bonds. According to the dimensions of the framework extended in space, COFs can be divided into two-dimensional and three-dimensional COFs. Owing to their high specific surface area, good stability and strong designability, COFs have broad prospects in the fields of gas adsorption and separation, catalysis, sensing, optoelectronics, and energy storage. In the field of photocatalysis, COFs have the following advantages. First, COFs are highly designable, which can achieve efficient photocatalysis by introducing different functional units to adjust the band gap energy and light absorption range. Secondly, the ordered structure of COFs improves the electron-hole separation efficiency. In addition, the high specific surface area and abundant active sites of COFs can promote the photocatalytic reaction and improve the reaction rate. Finally, COFs are connected by covalent bonds, which make them highly stable and facilitate the maintenance of catalytic activity in the photocatalytic process. Porphyrins are a class of 18 π-electron conjugated macrocyclic compounds formed by the interconnection of four pyrroles, which can be involved in photosynthesis as the core part of chlorophyll and other biomolecules. As a kind of functional units with large π-conjugated structure and good photophysical properties, porphyrins usually have strong absorption in the 400~450 nm (Soret band) and 500~700 nm (Q band) regions, and their photocatalytic properties can be regulated by coordination with metal ions and modification of functional groups, which has unique advantages in the field of photocatalysis. By introducing porphyrins into COFs, combined with their unique advantages, porphyrin-based COFs have been found great potential in the field of photocatalysis due to the exceptional optical absorption in a broad spectral range, multiple active sites and effective electron-hole separation ability. As a new type of photocatalyst, porphyrin-based COFs have attracted much interest and have been rapidly developed in the field of photocatalysis. In this review, we focus on the discussion of porphyrin-based COFs in the photocatalytic CO₂ reduction, photocatalytic water splitting, photocatalytic organic transformation, and photocatalytic reduction of hexavalent uranium. Finally, the prospects and challenges of porphyrin-based COFs in photocatalysis are discussed.

Key words: covalent organic framework, porphyrin, photocatalysis

引用此文

何明慧, 叶子秋, 林桂庆, 尹晟, 黄心翊, 周旭, 尹颖, 桂波, 汪成. 卟啉基共价有机框架的光催化研究进展^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(7): 784-792.

Minghui He, Ziqiu Ye, Guiqing Lin, Sheng Yin, Xinyi Huang, Xu Zhou, Ying Yin, Bo Gui, Cheng Wang. Research Progress of Porphyrin-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks in Photocatalysis^★[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2023, 81(7): 784-792.

导出引用 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

分享此文

图/表 7

图1. (a) TTCOF-M (M=2H, Zn, Ni, Cu)的CO2还原和H2O氧化机理示意图及(b) TTCOF-Zn的理论模拟紫外-可见漫反射光谱及其光诱导电子转移(PET)路径(插图)

Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the mechanism of TTCOF-M (M=2H, Zn, Ni, Cu) CO2 reduction reaction with H2O oxidation and (b) theoretical simulation UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of TTCOF-Zn and scheme of photoinduced electron transfer (PET) route under light excitation (inset)

图2. (a) TAPP-HFPB-COF的合成示意图、(b) TAPP-HFPB-COF的带隙、(c)可见光照射下6 h内TAPP-HFPB-COF光催化还原CO2性能(红色曲线: CO生成量; 蓝色曲线: CH4生成量)、(d) JUC-640-M(M=2H, Co, Ni)的合成示意图、(e)相同条件下JUC-640-M的光催化活性及(f) JUC-640-M (M=Co, Ni)上CO2还原为CO的自由能

Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram for construction of TAPP-HFPB-COF, (b) band alignment of TAPP-HFPB-COF, (c) photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance of TAPP-HFPB-COF upon visible-light irradiation within 6 h (red curve: CO; blue curve: CH4), (d) synthesis of JUC-640-M (M=2H, Co, Ni), (e) the photocatalytic activity of JUC-640-M and (f) free energy diagrams for CO2 reduction to CO on JUC-640-M (M=Co, Ni) under the same condition

图3. (a) MPor-DETH-COF (M=2H, Co, Ni, Zn)的合成示意图、(b)可见光照射下, H2析出量随光照时间的变化[2.5 mg MPor-DETH-COF (M=2H, Co, Ni, Zn), 5 mL磷酸盐缓冲溶液, 2.5 μL H2PtCl6的水溶液(w=8%), 50 μL 三乙醇胺(TEOA), λ>400 nm, 300 W氙灯]及(c)可见光照射下, ZnPor-DETH-COF在120 h内的产H2结果

Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram for construction of MPor-DETH-COF (M?=?2H, Co, Ni, Zn), (b) time dependent H2 photogeneration using visible light for MPor-DETH-COF (M?=?2H, Co, Ni, Zn) [2.5?mg catalyst in 5?mL phosphate buffer solution, 2.5?μL H2PtCl6 aqueous solution (w=8%), 50?μL triethanolamine (TEOA), λ?>?400?nm 300?W Xe lamp] and (c) long-term H2 production using visible light for ZnPor-DETH-COF for 120?h.

图4. (a) Por-sp2c-COF的合成示意图和(b) COFs对二苄胺进行氧化偶联的催化[[Ⅰ]条件: 仲胺(0.1 mmol), 光催化剂(9.67 mg), CH3CN (1 mL), 氯苯(10 μL), 用3 W白光LEDs照射0.5 h; [Ⅱ]转化率由GC-FID测定, 以氯苯为内标; [Ⅲ]Por-COF(8.71 mg); [Ⅳ]超氧化物清除剂为苯醌]

Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram for construction of Por-sp2c-COF and (b) oxidative coupling of dibenzylamine using the COFs as photocatalyst [[Ⅰ] Conditions: Dibenzylamine (0.1 mmol), photocatalyst (9.67 mg), CH3CN (1 mL), chlorobenzene (10 μL), irradiation with 3 W white LEDs for 0.5 h. [Ⅱ] Conversion determined by GC-FID with chlorobenzene as the internal standard. [Ⅲ]?Por-COF (8.71 mg). [Ⅳ] Benzoquinone was used as a superoxide scavenger (1 mg)]

图5. 可见光照射下, Por-sp2-COF和TEMPO协同光催化选择性氧化苄胺的可能机理示意图

Figure 5. Schematic diagram of a plausible mechanism of visible-light-induced selective aerobic oxidation of benzylamine by cooperative Por-sp2c-COF photocatalysis and TEMPO catalysis

图6. (a) 2D-PdPor-COF和3D-PdPor-COF的合成示意图、(b) 2D-PdPor-COF及(d) 3D-PdPor-COF的结构图、(c) 2D-PdPor-COF及(e) 3D-PdPor-COF中卟啉的堆积方式、(f) 2D-PdPor-COF和3D-PdPor-COF光催化硫代苯甲醚选择性氧化光催化制备甲基苯基亚砜

Figure 6. (a) Schematic diagram for construction of 2D-PdPor-COF and 3D-PdPor-COF, structural representations of 2D-PdPor-COF (b) and 3D-PdPor-COF (d), diagrams of the stacking of palladium porphyrin units in 2D-PdPor-COF (c) and 3D-PdPor-COF (e) and (f) photocatalytic production of methyl phenyl sulfoxide from the selective oxidation of thioanisole under the catalysis of 2D-PdPor-COF and 3D-PdPor-COF

图7. (a) DhaTph-M (M=Zn, Ni)的晶体结构和其在可见光照射下氧选择性活化成1O2和O2?－的示意图及(b)可见光照射下不同催化剂在O2气氛中对松油烯的光催化氧化作用I[I反应条件: 催化剂(10 mg), 松油烯(0.1 mmol), 3 mL CH3CN, 300 W Xe灯可见光(λ>420 nm), O2 (101 kPa); II产品的产量通过GC分析, 正十二烷作为内标]

Figure 7. (a) Crystal structure of DhaTph-M (M=Zn and Ni) and diagram representation of their discriminative oxygen activation selectivity to 1O2 and O2?－ under visible light irradiation and (b) photocatalytic oxidation of α-terpinene over different catalysts in O2 atmosphere under visible light irradiationI [IReaction conditions: catalyst (10 mg), α-terpinene (0.1 mmol), 3 mL of CH3CN, 300 W Xe lamp with visible light (λ>420 nm), O2 (101 kPa). IIYield of products was analyzed by GC, and n-dodecane was used as the internal standard]

参考文献 26

[1]	Li X. B.; Xin Z. K.; Xia S. G.; Gao X. Y.; Tung C. H.; Wu L. Z. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 9028. doi: 10.1039/D0CS00930J
[2]	(a) Li X. B.; Tung C. H.; Wu L. Z. Nat. Rev. Chem 2018, 2, 160. doi: 10.1038/s41570-018-0024-8
	(b) Frischmann P. D.; Mahata K.; Wurthner F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 1847. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35223K
[3]	(a) Du P.; Eisenberg R. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6012. doi: 10.1039/c2ee03250c
	(b) Guo Q.; Ma Z.; Zhou C.; Ren Z.; Yang X. M. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 11020. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00226
	(c) Li S. H.; Qi M. Y.; Tang Z. R.; Xu Y. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 7539. doi: 10.1039/D1CS00323B
	(d) Sulas-Kern D. B.; Miller E. M.; Blackburn J. L. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 2684. doi: 10.1039/D0EE01370F
	(e) Cheng Z.; Qi W.; Pang C. H.; Thomas T.; Wu T.; Liu S.; Yang M. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2100553. doi: 10.1002/adfm.v31.26
[4]	(a) Yuan Y. J.; Yu Z. T.; Chen D. Q.; Zou Z. G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 603. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00436A
	(b) Jing X.; He C.; Zhao L.; Duan C. Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 100. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00463
	(c) Lavarda G.; Labella J.; Martínez-Díaz M. V.; Rodríguez-Morgade M. S.; Osuka A.; Torres T. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 9482. doi: 10.1039/D2CS00280A
	(d) Bai X.; Yan S.; Wang J.; Wang L.; Jiang W.; Wu S.; Sun C.; Zhu Y. F. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 17521. doi: 10.1039/C4TA02781G
	(e) Lee J.-S. M.; Cooper A. I. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 2171. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00399
	(f) Schwab M. G.; Hamburger M.; Feng X.; Shu J.; Spiess H. W.; Wang X.; Antonietti M.; Müllen K. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8932. doi: 10.1039/c0cc04057f
	(g) Wang H.; Wang H.; Wang Z.; Tang L.; Zeng G.; Xu P.; Chen M.; Xiong T.; Zhou C.; Li X.; Huang D.; Zhu Y.; Wang Z.; Tang J. W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 4135. doi: 10.1039/D0CS00278J
[5]	(a) Ding S. Y.; Wang W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 548. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35072F
	(b) Geng K.; He T.; Liu R.; Dalapati S.; Tan K. T.; Li Z.; Tao S.; Gong Y.; Jiang Q.; Jiang D. L. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 8814. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00550
	(c) Liang R. R.;Jiang, S. Y.; A, R. H.; Zhao, X. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 3920. doi: 10.1039/D0CS00049C
	(d) Lyle S. J.; Waller P. J.; Yaghi O. M. Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 172. doi: 10.1016/j.trechm.2019.03.001
	(e) Gui B.; Ding H.; Cheng Y.; Mal A.; Wang C. Trends Chem. 2022, 4, 437. doi: 10.1016/j.trechm.2022.01.002
[6]	Guan X.; Chen F.; Fang Q.; Qiu S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 1357. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00911F
[7]	(a) Jiang L.; Tian Y.; Sun T.; Zhu Y.; Ren H.; Zou X.; Ma Y.; Meihaus K. R.; Long J. R.; Zhu G. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 15724. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b08174
	(b) Khan N. A.; Zhang R.; Wu H.; Shen J.; Yuan J.; Fan C.; Cao L.; Olson M. A.; Jiang Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 13450. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c04589
	(c) Zhao S.; Jiang C.; Fan J.; Hong S.; Mei P.; Yao R.; Liu Y.; Zhang S.; Li H.; Zhang H.; Sun C.; Guo Z.; Shao P.; Zhu Y.; Zhang J.; Guo L.; Ma Y.; Zhang J.; Feng X.; Wang F.; Wu H.; Wang B. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 1551. doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-01052-w
	(d) Zhang Z.; Kang C.; Peh S. B.; Shi D.; Yang F.; Liu Q.; Zhao D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 14992. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c05309
[8]	(a) Vyas V. S.; Haase F.; Stegbauer L.; Savasci G.; Podjaski F.; Ochsenfeld C.; Lotsch B. V. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8508. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9508
	(b) Yang S.; Hu W.; Zhang X.; He P.; Pattengale B.; Liu C.; Cendejas M.; Hermans I.; Zhang X.; Zhang J.; Huang J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 14614. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b09705
	(c) Zhi Q.; Liu W.; Jiang R.; Zhan X.; Jin Y.; Chen X.; Yang X.; Wang K.; Cao W.; Qi D.; Jiang J. Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 21328. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c09482
	(d) Zhao W.; Yan P.; Yang H.; Bahri M.; James A. M.; Chen H.; Liu L.; Li B.; Pang Z.; Clowes R.; Browning N. D.; Ward J. W.; Wu Y.; Cooper A. I. Nat. Synth. 2022, 1, 87. doi: 10.1038/s44160-021-00005-0
[9]	(a) Jhulki S.; Evans A. M.; Hao X.-L.; Cooper M. W.; Feriante C. H.; Leisen J.; Li H.; Lam D.; Hersam M. C.; Barlow S.; Brédas J.-L.; Dichtel W. R.; Marder S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 783. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b08628
	(b) Meng Z.; Stolz R. M.; Mirica K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 11929. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b03441
	(c) Das G.; Biswal B. P.; Kandambeth S.; Venkatesh V.; Kaur G.; Addicoat M.; Heine T.; Verma S.; Banerjee R. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 3931. doi: 10.1039/C5SC00512D
[10]	(a) Jin E.; Asada M.; Xu Q.; Dalapati S.; Addicoat M. A.; Brady M. A.; Xu H.; Nakamura T.; Heine T.; Chen Q.; Jiang D. Science 2017, 357, 673. doi: 10.1126/science.aan0202
	(b) Ding H.; Li J.; Xie G.; Lin G.; Chen R.; Peng Z.; Yang C.; Wang B.; Sun J.; Wang C. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5234. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07670-4
	(c) Jakowetz A. C.; Hinrichsen T. F.; Ascherl L.; Sick T.; Calik M.; Auras F.; Medina D. D.; Friend R. H.; Rao A.; Bein T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 11565. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b03956
	(d) Qi M.; Zhou Y.; Lv Y.; Chen W.; Su X.; Zhang T.; Xing G.; Xu G.; Terasaki O.; Chen L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 2739. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c10717
[11]	(a) Zhang Q.; Dong S.; Shao P.; Zhu Y.; Mu Z.; Sheng D.; Zhang T.; Jiang X.; Shao R.; Ren Z.; Xie J.; Feng X.; Wang B. Science 2022, 378, 181. doi: 10.1126/science.abm6304
	(b) Li X.; Wang H.; Chen H.; Zheng Q.; Zhang Q.; Mao H.; Liu Y.; Cai S.; Sun B.; Dun C.; Gordon M. P.; Zheng H.; Reimer J. A.; Urban J. J.; Ciston J.; Tan T.; Chan E. M.; Zhang J.; Liu Y. Chem 2020, 6, 933. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.01.011
	(c) Yang X.; Hu Y.; Dunlap N.; Wang X.; Huang S.; Su Z.; Sharma S.; Jin Y.; Huang F.; Wang X.; Lee S.-H.; Zhang W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 20385. doi: 10.1002/anie.v59.46
	(d) Wu C.; Liu Y.; Liu H.; Duan C.; Pan Q.; Zhu J.; Hu F.; Ma X.; Jiu T.; Li Z.; Zhao Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 10016. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b06291
	(e) Peng Z.; Ding H.; Chen R.; Gao C.; Wang C. Acta Chim. Sinica 2019, 77, 681. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6023/A19040118
	(彭正康, 丁慧敏, 陈如凡, 高超, 汪成, 化学学报, 2019, 77, 681.)
[12]	(a) Du Y. D.; Zhou C. Y.; To W. P.; Wang H. X.; Che C. M. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 4680. doi: 10.1039/D0SC00784F
	(b) Li L. L.; Diau E. W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 291. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35257E
	(c) Najafpour M. M.; Renger G.; Holynska M.; Moghaddam A. N.; Aro E. M.; Carpentier R.; Nishihara H.; Eaton-Rye J. J.; Shen J. R.; Allakhverdiev S. I. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 2886. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00340
	(d) Zhang W.; Lai W.; Cao R. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 3717. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00299
[13]	Urbani M.; Gratzel M.; Nazeeruddin M. K.; Torres T. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 12330. doi: 10.1021/cr5001964
[14]	(a) Drain C. M.; Varotto V.; Radivojevi I. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 1631.
	(b) Gao W. Y.; Chrzanowski M.; Ma S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5841. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00001C
	(c) Hasobe T. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 15975. doi: 10.1039/c2cp42957h
	(d) Jiang Z. W.; Zou Y. C.; Zhao T. T.; Zhen S. J.; Li Y. F.; Huang C. Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 3300. doi: 10.1002/anie.v59.8
[15]	(a) Chen R.; Shi J. L.; Ma Y.; Lin G.; Lang X.; Wang C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 6430. doi: 10.1002/anie.v58.19
	(b) Meng Y.; Luo Y.; Shi J. L.; Ding H.; Lang X.; Chen W.; Zheng A.; Sun J.; Wang C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 3624. doi: 10.1002/anie.v59.9
	(c) Sun N.; Jin Y.; Wang H.; Yu B.; Wang R.; Wu H.; Zhou W.; Jiang J. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 1956. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c04436
	(d) Jin F.; Lin E.; Wang T.; Yan D.; Yang Y.; Chen Y.; Cheng P.; Zhang Z. Chem 2022, 8, 3064. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.07.016
	(e) Gong Y. N.; Zhong W.; Li Y.; Qiu Y.; Zheng L.; Jiang J.; Jiang H. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 16723. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c07206
	(f) Lu M.; Liu J.; Li Q.; Zhang M.; Liu M.; Wang J. L.; Yuan D. Q.; Lan Y. Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12392. doi: 10.1002/anie.v58.36
	(g) Xu X.; Cai P.; Chen H.; Zhou H. C.; Huang N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 18511. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c07733
	(h) Ding J.; Guan X.; Lv J.; Chen X.; Zhang Y.; Li H.; Zhang D.; Qiu S.; Jiang H. L.; Fang Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 3248. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c13817
[16]	(a) Wu Q. J.; Liang J.; Huang Y. B.; Cao R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 2978. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00326
	(b) Wang K.; Qi D. D.; Li Y. L.; Wang T. Y.; Liu H. B.; Jiang J. Z. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 378, 188. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.08.023
[17]	(a) Francis Kurisingal J.; Kim H.; Hyeak Choe J.; Seop Hong C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 473, 214835. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214835
	(b) He Z.; Goulas J.; Parker E.; Sun Y.; Zhou X.-D.; Fei L. Catal. Today 2023, 409, 103. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2022.04.021
[18]	(a) Wang X.; Ding X.; Wang T.; Wang K.; Jin Y.; Han Y.; Zhang P.; Li N.; Wang H.; Jiang J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 41122. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c12542
	(b) Dong M.; Li W.; Zhou J.; You S. Q.; Sun C. Y.; Yao X. H.; Qin C.; Wang X. L.; Su Z. M. Chin. J. Chem. 2022, 40, 2678. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.v40.22
	(c) Yu X.; Huang W.; Li Y. G. Acta Chim. Sinica 2022, 80, 1494. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6023/A22070303
	(于潇涵, 黄伟, 李彦光, 化学学报, 2022, 80, 1494.)
	(d) Chen Q.; Kuang Q.; Xie Z. X. Acta Chim. Sinica 2021, 79, 10. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6023/A20080384
	(陈钱, 匡勤, 谢兆雄, 化学学报, 2021, 79, 10.)
[19]	(a) Song D.; Xu W.; Li J.; Zhao J.; Shi Q.; Li F.; Sun X.; Wang N. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 2425. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(22)64143-3
	(b) Skorjanc T.; Shetty D.; Mahmoud M. E.; Gandara F.; Martinez J. I.; Mohammed A. K.; Boutros S.; Merhi A.; Shehayeb E. O.; Sharabati C. A.; Damacet P.; Raya J.; Gardonio S.; Hmadeh M.; Kaafarani B. R.; Trabolsi A. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 2015. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c20729
	(c) Gong L. J.; Liu L. Y.; Zhao S. S.; Yang S. L.; Si D. H.; Wu Q. J.; Wu Q.; Huang Y. B.; Cao R. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 458, 141360. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.141360
[20]	(a) Wang L.; Huang G.; Zhang L.; Lian R.; Huang J.; She H.; Liu C.; Wang Q. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 64, 85. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.04.053
	(b) Zou L.; Sa R.; Zhong H.; Lv H.; Wang X.; Wang R. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 3550. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c05449
[21]	(a) Ye S.; Ding C.; Liu M.; Wang A.; Huang Q.; Li C. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1902069. doi: 10.1002/adma.v31.50
	(b) Tao X.; Zhao Y.; Wang S.; Li C.; Li R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 3561. doi: 10.1039/D1CS01182K
	(c) Qi Y.; Zhang F. Acta Chim. Sinica 2022, 80, 827. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6023/A21120607
	(祁育, 章福祥, 化学学报, 2022, 80, 827.)
[22]	(a) Chen R.; Wang Y.; Ma Y.; Mal A.; Gao X. Y.; Gao L.; Qiao L.; Li X. B.; Wu L. Z.; Wang C. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1354. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21527-3
	(b) Xu Z.; Cui X.; Li Y.; Li Y.; Si Z.; Duan Q. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 613, 155966. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155966
	(c) Lv M.; Ren X.; Cao R.; Chang Z.; Chang X.; Bai F.; Li Y. Polymers 2022, 14, 4893. doi: 10.3390/polym14224893
[23]	(a) Wu S.; Zhang Y. F.; Ding H.; Li X.; Lang X. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 610, 446. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.024
	(b) Li P.; Dong X.; Zhang Y.; Lang X.; Wang C. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 25, 100953.
	(c) Shi J. L.; Chen R.; Hao H.; Wang C.; Lang X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 908.
[24]	(a) Feng K.; Hao H.; Huang F.; Lang X.; Wang C. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 2255. doi: 10.1039/D0QM01076F
	(b) Shan H.; Cai D.; Zhang X.; Zhu Q.; Qin P.; Baeyens J. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 432, 134288. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.134288
	(c) Kan X.; Wang J. C.; Chen Z.; Du J. Q.; Kan J. L.; Li W. Y.; Dong Y. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 6681. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c01186
[25]	Qian Y.; Li D.; Han Y.; Jiang H. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 20763. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c09727
[26]	Chen L.; Hang J.; Chen B.; Kang J.; Yan Z.; Wang Z.; Zhang Y.; Chen S.; Wang Y.; Jin Y.; Xia C. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 454, 140378. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.140378

卟啉基共价有机框架的光催化研究进展^★

Research Progress of Porphyrin-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks in Photocatalysis^★

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

图/表 7

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

[1]	陈健强, 朱钢国, 吴劼. 镍催化氮杂环丙烷的开环偶联反应研究[J]. 化学学报, 2024, 82(2): 190-212.
[2]	魏颖, 王家成, 李玥, 汪涛, 马述威, 解令海. 碳碳键链接的二维共价有机框架研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2024, 82(1): 75-102.
[3]	吴宇晗, 张栋栋, 尹宏宇, 陈正男, 赵文, 匙玉华. “双碳”目标下Janus In₂S₂X光催化还原CO₂的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(9): 1148-1156.
[4]	杨蓉婕, 周璘, 苏彬. 基于共价有机框架修饰电极的维生素A和C的选择性检测^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(8): 920-927.
[5]	刘建川, 李翠艳, 刘耀祖, 王钰杰, 方千荣. 高稳定二维联咔唑sp²碳共轭共价有机框架材料用于高效电催化氧还原^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(8): 884-890.
[6]	刘嘉文, 林玮璜, 王惟嘉, 郭学益, 杨英. Cu_1.94S-SnS纳米异质结的合成及其光催化降解研究[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(7): 725-734.
[7]	刘坜, 郑刚, 范国强, 杜洪光, 谭嘉靖. 4-酰基/氨基羰基/烷氧羰基取代汉斯酯参与的有机反应研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(6): 657-668.
[8]	李飞, 丁汇丽, 李超忠. 基于氟仿衍生的三氟甲基硼络合物参与的烯烃氢三氟甲基化反应[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(6): 577-581.
[9]	徐袁利, 潘辉, 杨义, 左智伟. 连续流条件下蒽-铈协同催化的苄位碳氢键选择性氧化反应^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(5): 435-440.
[10]	齐学平, 王飞, 张健. 后合成法构筑钛基金属有机框架及其应用[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(5): 548-558.
[11]	李万红, 于明月, 王丽丽, 朱德煌, 彭素红, 王惠, 刘海洋. 溶剂对四苯基卟啉氯化锰飞秒瞬态吸收光谱的影响[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(4): 345-350.
[12]	陈俊畅, 张明星, 王殳凹. 晶态多孔材料合成方法的研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(2): 146-157.
[13]	陈健强, 朱钢国, 吴劼. 草酸酯类化合物在自由基脱羟基化反应中的研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(11): 1609-1623.
[14]	杨春晖, 陈景超, 李新汉, 孟丽, 王凯民, 孙蔚青, 樊保敏. 可见光催化的硅烷二氟烯丙基化反应[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(1): 1-5.
[15]	解众舒, 薛中鑫, 许子文, 李倩, 王洪宇, 李维实. 石墨相氮化碳的共轭交联修饰及其对可见光催化产氢性能的影响[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(9): 1231-1237.

卟啉基共价有机框架的光催化研究进展★

Research Progress of Porphyrin-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks in Photocatalysis★

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

图/表 7

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

卟啉基共价有机框架的光催化研究进展^★

Research Progress of Porphyrin-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks in Photocatalysis^★