“拟双子”阴离子表面活性剂在癸烷/水界面的分子动力学模拟

doi:10.6023/A19100364

化学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 78 ›› Issue (2): 155-160.DOI: 10.6023/A19100364 上一篇下一篇

研究论文

“拟双子”阴离子表面活性剂在癸烷/水界面的分子动力学模拟

高斯萌, 夏坤, 康志红, 乃永宁, 袁瑞霞, 牛瑞霞

东北石油大学化学化工学院大庆 163318

投稿日期:2019-10-12 发布日期:2020-01-11
通讯作者: 高斯萌, 牛瑞霞 E-mail:gaosimeng2006@126.com;niuruixia999@sina.com
基金资助:
项目受国家自然科学基金（No.21606042）、东北石油大学培育基金（No.2017PYQZL-08）和东北石油大学人才工程科研启动基金（No.RC201724）资助.

Molecular Dynamics Simulation of “Quasi-Gemini” Anionic Surfactant at the Decane/Water Interface

Gao Simeng, Xia Kun, Kang Zhihong, Nai Yongning, Yuan Ruixia, Niu Ruixia

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318

Received:2019-10-12 Published:2020-01-11
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21606042), Northeast Petroleum University Cultivation Fund (No. 2017PYQZL-08) and Northeast Petroleum University Talent Engineering Research Start Fund (No. RC201724).

文章分享

摘要/Abstract

采用全原子分子动力学模拟方法研究了壬基酚取代的系列烷基磺酸盐表面活性剂在癸烷/水界面的微观聚集行为，通过分析界面厚度、界面生成能和界面张力以及表面活性剂分子与水分子之间的径向分布函数和配位数，讨论了不同磺烷基链长度对壬基酚基取代烷基磺酸盐表面活性剂界面性质的影响.结果表明，磺烷基链长为12时，表面活性剂的界面张力最低，界面厚度和界面生成能最大.

关键词: 壬基酚取代烷基磺酸盐, 分子动力学, 界面性质, 油水界面, 聚集行为

Anionic surfactants play a key role in many industrial fields such as drug delivery, detergent, oil displacement and food processing because of their unique amphiphilic properties. The structure of surfactant in oil-water system has a great influence on the interfacial behavior. It is of great significance to study the structure and interfacial properties of surfactants. In this paper, the all-atomic molecular dynamics method was used to study the aggregation behavior of nonylphenol-substituted series of alkyl sulfonate surfactants (C_n-NPAS) at the decane/water interface. The effects of different sulfoalkyl chain lengths on the interfacial properties of nonylphenol-substituted alkyl sulfonate surfactants were investigated by analyzing the interface thickness, interface formation energy, interfacial tension, the radial distribution function and coordination number. Simulation results have shown that the interfacial thickness increases at first and then decreases as the length of sulfoalkyl chain increases. The same trend was found in the results of the interface formation energy (IFE). The absolute value of IFE follows the order of C₁₂-NPAS > C₁₄-NPAS > C₁₀-NPAS > C₁₆-NPAS > C₈-NPAS, indicating that the C₁₂-NPAS is the most stable system in terms of energy which should be attribute to the stronger aggregation ability. Moreover, it is observed that the trend of interfacial tension is in agreement with that of interface formation energy and the interface thickness. Surfactant C₁₂-NPAS induces the minimum interfacial tension. The calculation results are consistent with the experimental data. Furthermore, the radial distribution function and the coordination number of water around the surfactant headgroup were obtained for evaluating the interaction strength between the hydrophilic headgroup and water molecules. The results are well in accordance with the trend of the interface formation energy and interfacial tension. This indicates that the length of alkyl tail affect the interaction between hydrophilic headgroup and water indirectly. Simulation results suggest that the length of alkyl tail plays a dominant role in the interfacial behaviors. We expect that the results of this study could be valuable for the understanding of mechanism and the design of high performance surfactants.

Key words: nonylphenol substituted alkyl sulfonate, molecular dynamics, interface property, oil-water interface, aggregation behavior

引用此文

高斯萌, 夏坤, 康志红, 乃永宁, 袁瑞霞, 牛瑞霞. “拟双子”阴离子表面活性剂在癸烷/水界面的分子动力学模拟[J]. 化学学报, 2020, 78(2): 155-160.

Gao Simeng, Xia Kun, Kang Zhihong, Nai Yongning, Yuan Ruixia, Niu Ruixia. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of “Quasi-Gemini” Anionic Surfactant at the Decane/Water Interface[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2020, 78(2): 155-160.

导出引用 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

分享此文

参考文献

[1] He, X. B.; Guvench, O.; Mackerell Jr., A. D.; Klein, M. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 9787.
[2] Yu, Y. X.; Zhao, J.; Guvench, O.; Bayly, A. E. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2008, 16, 517.
[3] Zhao, W. W.; Wang, Y. L. Acta Chim. Sinica 2019, 77, 717(in Chinese). (赵微微, 王毅琳, 化学学报, 2019, 77, 717.)
[4] Yan, H.; Guo, X. L.; Liu, C. B.; Yuan, S. L. Langmuir 2011, 27, 5762.
[5] Lin, C.; Pan, R. M.; Xing, P. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 38, 3260(in Chinese). (林超, 潘仁明, 邢萍, 有机化学, 2018, 38, 3260.)
[6] Zhao, Y.; Wang, C.; Chow, A. H.; Ren, K.; Gong, T.; Zhang, Z. R.; Zheng, Y. Int. J. Pharm. B 2010, 383, 170.
[7] Liao, G. Z.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H. Z.; Liu, W. D.; Wang, Z. M. Acta Petrolei Sinica 2017, 38, 196(in Chinese). (廖广志, 王强, 王红庄, 刘卫东, 王正茂, 石油学报, 2017, 38, 196.)
[8] Yu, T.; Liu, H. J.; Ding, W. Chin. J. Appl. Chem. 2008, 25, 1107(in Chinese). (于涛, 刘红娟, 丁伟, 应用化学, 2008, 25, 1107.)
[9] Chen, X. M.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y. Chin. J. Chem. 2018, 36, 526.
[10] Li, H. F.; Qiao, F. L.; Fan, Y. X.; Wang, Y. L. Acta Chim. Sinica 2018, 76, 564(in Chinese). (李浩飞, 乔富林, 范雅珣, 王毅琳, 化学学报, 2018, 76, 564.)
[11] Li, M.; Zhang, C.; Yang, X. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 1706.
[12] Li, Z. Q.; Guo, X. L.; Wang, H. Y.; Li, Q. H.; Yuan, S. L. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2009, 25, 6(in Chinese). (李振泉, 郭新利, 王红艳, 李青华, 苑世领, 物理化学学报, 2009, 25, 6.)
[13] Jang, S. S.; Lin, S. T.; Maiti, P. K.; Blanco, M.; Goddard, W. A.; Shuler, P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 12130.
[14] Sun, H. Q.; Xiao, H. Y.; Liu, X. H. Sci. Chin. Chem. 2011, 54, 1078(in Chinese). (孙唤泉, 肖红艳, 刘新厚, 中国科学:化学, 2011, 54, 1078.)
[15] Shi, J.; Lv, K.; Yuan, S. L. J. Shandong Univ. (Engineering Science) 2012, 42, 77(in Chinese). (石静, 吕凯, 苑世领, 山东大学学报:工学版, 2012, 42, 77.)
[16] Wang, Y. F.; Yu, W. Z.; Hu, S. Q. J. Chin. Univ. Petro. 2011, 35, 153(in Chinese). (王业飞, 于维钊, 胡松青, 中国石油大学学报, 2011, 35, 153.)
[17] Niu, R. X.; Wang, D. Q.; Wang, J. L.; Wang, C.; Song, H. J. Chem. Ind. Eng. 2016, 67, 2944(in Chinese). (牛瑞霞, 王大强, 王敬玲, 王超, 宋华, 化工学报, 2016, 67, 2944.)
[18] Tan, J. S.; Zhang, L.; Lim, F. C.; Cheong, D. W. Langmuir 2017, 33, 4461.
[19] Martínez, L.; Andrade, R.; Birgin, E. G. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 2157.
[20] Lundborg, M.; Lindahl, E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 119, 810.
[21] Wang, J.; Wolf, R. M.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A. J. Comp. Chem. 2004, 25, 1157.
[22] Sastry, N. V.; Valand, M. K. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 1998, 30, 929.
[23] Pai, Y. H.; Chen, L. J. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1998, 43, 665.
[24] Hou, M. D.; Li, H. P.; Hu, Z. Z.; Song, H. W. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics 2018, 48, 243(in Chinese). (候孟蝶, 李惠萍, 胡子昭, 宋宏伟, 日用化学工业, 2018, 48, 243.)
[25] Hu, X. Y.; Song, X. W.; Li, Q. W.; He, X. J.; Li, Y. Acta Chim. Sinica 2009, 67, 1691(in Chinese). (胡晓莹, 宋新旺, 李全伟, 何秀娟, 李英, 化学学报, 2009, 67, 1691.)
[26] Olayiwola, S. O.; Dejam, M. Fuel 2019, 241, 1045.
[27] Jiang, R. J.; Luo, J. H.; Bai, R. B.; Jiang, B.; Zhou, G. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2017, 38, 1804(in Chinese). (江蓉君, 罗健辉, 白瑞兵, 江波, 周歌, 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38, 1804.)
[28] Zeppieri, S.; Rodriguez, J.; López, R. A. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2001, 46, 1086.
[29] Wang, J.; Wang, J. X.; Zeng, F. G.; Wu, X. L. Acta Chim. Sinica 2010, 68, 1653(in Chinese). (王进, 王军霞, 曾凡桂, 吴秀玲, 化学学报, 2010, 68, 1653.)
[30] Liu, M. T.; Pu, M. F.; Ma, H. W. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2012, 33, 1319(in Chinese). (刘梅堂, 浦敏锋, 马鸿文, 高等学校化学学报, 2012, 33, 1319.)
[31] Liu, Z. Y.; Liao, Q.; Jin, Z. Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sinica 2016, 32, 1168(in Chinese). (刘子瑜, 廖琦, 靳志强, 张磊, 张路, 物理化学学报, 2016, 32, 1168.)

“拟双子”阴离子表面活性剂在癸烷/水界面的分子动力学模拟

Molecular Dynamics Simulation of “Quasi-Gemini” Anionic Surfactant at the Decane/Water Interface

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

[1]	王海朋, 蔡文生, 邵学广. 抗冻剂抗冻机制的近红外光谱与分子模拟研究^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(9): 1167-1174.
[2]	王端达, 沈欣怡, 宋永杨, 王树涛. 新兴Janus颗粒在油水分离中的应用进展^★[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(9): 1187-1195.
[3]	刘祯钰, 甘利华. 乙炔热解为富勒烯的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(5): 502-510.
[4]	王娟, 肖华敏, 谢丁, 郭元茹, 潘清江. 铜掺杂与氮化碳复合氧化锌材料结构和二氧化氮气体传感性质的密度泛函理论计算[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(11): 1493-1499.
[5]	韩逸之, 蓝建慧, 刘学, 石伟群. 基于机器学习势函数的熔盐体系分子动力学研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(11): 1663-1672.
[6]	赵珂, 程夏宇, 马雪雪, 耿明慧. 含哌嗪基团锌离子探针的双光子吸收增强机理[J]. 化学学报, 2023, 81(10): 1371-1378.
[7]	齐子朋, 高冬, 朱志成, 贺志远, 白国英. 聚乙烯醇调控水溶性共轭聚噻吩的光学性质[J]. 化学学报, 2022, 80(7): 921-928.
[8]	杜英喆, 张恒, 苑世领. Al₂O₃/PDMS复合材料热传导的分子动力学模拟[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(6): 787-793.
[9]	刘长安, 洪士博, 李蓓. 石墨烯在甘油/尿素剥离液中的稳定行为的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(4): 530-538.
[10]	梁尊, 张鑫, 吕松泰, 梁洪涛, 杨洋. 单分子层受限冰-水共存界线毛细波与固-液相变动力学[J]. 化学学报, 2021, 79(1): 108-118.
[11]	范勤, 梁洪涛, 许贤祺, 吕松泰, 梁尊, 杨洋. 应用极化水分子模型研究单分子层受限水的介电性质[J]. 化学学报, 2020, 78(6): 547-556.
[12]	高振, 黄焜, 杜林, 刘会洲. 酸性有机磷类萃取剂单分子膜的气-液界面行为:亚相pH和铺展溶剂的影响[J]. 化学学报, 2019, 77(6): 506-514.
[13]	杨鹏里, 王振兴, 梁尊, 梁洪涛, 杨洋. 电场作用下水表面电势的分子动力学研究[J]. 化学学报, 2019, 77(10): 1045-1053.
[14]	杜涵, 梁洪涛, 杨洋. 限域单分子层冰-水两相平衡体系的分子动力学模拟[J]. 化学学报, 2018, 76(6): 483-490.
[15]	郭宇, 姚远, 李慧, 赫兰兰, 朱尊伟, 杨忠志, 宫利东, 刘翠, 赵东霞. 光合释氧机理的ABEEM/MM/MD和BS-DFT理论研究[J]. 化学学报, 2017, 75(9): 903-913.