电化学促进未活化C(sp3)—H官能团化研究进展

doi:10.6023/cjoc202309024

摘要/Abstract

有机电合成以无痕电子代替传统的化学氧化剂或还原剂, 具有绿色易放大等优势. 未活化C(sp³)—H键的官能团化可以将目标官能团直接引入分子中进行修饰, 避免预官能团化, 兼具原子经济性和步骤经济性. 随着有机电合成发展的日益成熟, 电化学促进未活化C(sp³)—H官能团化成为了有机合成的研究热点之一. 根据官能团类型对反应进行分类, 总结了近年来涉及未活化C(sp³)—H官能化的研究成果, 重点分析了反应优势、底物特点以及反应机理, 最后展望了面临的挑战及未来的发展趋势.

关键词: 有机电合成, 未活化C(sp³)—H键, 官能团化

Organic electrosynthesis replaces traditional chemical oxidants or reductants with traceless electrons, which has the advantages of sustainability and easy to scale up. The functionalization of unactivated C(sp³)—H bond can directly introduce the target functional group into the molecules, avoiding pre-functionalization and possessing both atomic and step economies. With the development of organic electrosynthesis, electrochemical-promoted functionalization of unactivated C(sp³)—H bond has become one of the hotspots in organic synthesis. The functional groups are classified according to the types of functional groups, and the recent achievements related to the functionalization of unactivated C(sp³)—H bond are summarized, with emphasis on analyzing reaction advantages, substrate scope, and reaction mechanism. Finally, the current challenges and future development are briefly discussed.

Key words: organic electrosynthesis, unactivated C(sp³)—H bond, functionalization

引用此文

高瑞林, 文丽荣, 郭维斯. 电化学促进未活化C(sp³)—H官能团化研究进展[J]. 有机化学, 2024, 44(3): 892-902.

Ruilin Gao, Lirong Wen, Weisi Guo. Recent Advances in Electrochemical-Promoted Unactivated C(sp³)—H Functionalization[J]. Chinese Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2024, 44(3): 892-902.

导出引用 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

分享此文

图/表 15

图1. C(sp3)—H键的BDE

Figure 1. BDE of C(sp3)—H bond

图式1. 反应模式

Scheme 1. Reaction activation mode

图式2. 奎宁环介导的电化学促进未活化C(sp3)—H键氧化

Scheme 2. Electrochemical-promoted oxidation of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond mediated by quinuclidine

图式3. N-铵基叶立德介导的电化学促进未活化C(sp3)—H键氧化

Scheme 3. Electrochemical-promoted oxidation of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond mediated by N-ammonium ylide

图式4. 电化学促进未活化C(sp3)—H键羟基化

Scheme 4. Electrochemical-promoted hydroxylation of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond

图式5. 电化学促进钯催化未活化C(sp3)—H键氧化

Scheme 5. Electrochemical-promoted oxidation of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond catalyzed by palladium

图式6. 光电协同催化未活化C(sp3)—H键氧化

Scheme 6. Photoelectrocatalyzed oxidation of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond

图式7. 光电协同催化未活化C(sp3)—H键叠氮化

Scheme 7. Photoelectrocatalyzed azidation of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond

图式8. 电化学促进锰催化未活化C(sp3)—H键叠氮化

Scheme 8. Electrochemical-promoted azidation of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond catalyzed by manganese

图式9. 电化学促进未活化C(sp3)—H键胺化

Scheme 9. Electrochemical-promoted amination of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond

图式10. 光电协同催化未活化C(sp3)—H键杂芳化

Scheme 10. Photoelectrocatalyzed for heteroaromatization of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond

图式11. 电化学促进未活化C(sp3)—H键杂芳化

Scheme 11. Electrochemical-promoted heteroaromatization of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond

图式12. 光电协同催化未活化C(sp3)—H与苯并噻唑的交叉偶联

Scheme 12. Photoelectrocatalyzed cross coupling of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond with benzothiazoles

图式13. 电化学促进未活化C(sp3)—H键氟化

Scheme 13. Electrochemical-promoted fluorination of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond

图式14. 电化学促进未活化C(sp3)—H键烯基化和酰基化

Scheme 14. Electrochemical-promoted alkenylation and acylation of unactivated C(sp3)—H bond

参考文献 39

[1]	Faraday M. Ann. Phys. 1834, 47, 438.
[2]	Kolbe H. J. Prakt. Chem. 1847, 41, 138.
[3]	Yan M.; Kawamata Y.; Baran P. S. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1323.
[4]	Xiong P.; Xu H.-C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 3339. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00472
[5]	Yuan Y.; Yang Y.; Lei A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 10058. doi: 10.1039/D1CS00150G
[6]	Cheng X.; Lei A.; Mei T.-S.; Xu H.-C.; Xu K.; Zeng C. CCS Chem. 2022, 4, 1120. doi: 10.31635/ccschem.021.202101451
[7]	Tang H.-T.; Pan Y.-Z.; Pan Y.-M. Green Chem. 2023, 25, 8313. doi: 10.1039/D3GC02106H
[8]	Li Y.; Wen L.; Guo W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52, 1168. doi: 10.1039/D3CS00009E
[9]	(a) He J.; Wasa M.; Chan K. S. L.; Shao Q.; Yu J.-Q. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8754. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00622 pmid: 35965690
	(b) Golden D. L.; Suh S.-E.; Stahl S. S. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2022, 6, 405. doi: 10.1038/s41570-022-00388-4 pmid: 35965690
[10]	Liu B.; Romine A. M.; Rubel C. Z.; Engle K. M.; Shi B.-F. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 14957. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00519
[11]	White M. C.; Zhao J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 13988. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b05195
[12]	Kawamata Y.; Yan M.; Liu Z.; Bao D.-H.; Chen J.; Starr J. T.; Baran P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 7448. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b03539 pmid: 28510449
[13]	Saito M.; Kawamata Y.; Meanwell M.; Navratil R.; Chiodi D.; Carlson E.; Hu P.; Chen L.; Udyavara S.; Kingston C.; Tanwar M.; Tyagi S.; McKillican B. P.; Gichinga M. G.; Schmidt M. A.; Eastgate M. D.; Lamberto M.; He C.; Tang T.; Malapit C. A.; Sigman M. S.; Minteer S. D.; Neuroc M. K.; Baran P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 7859. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c03780
[14]	(a) Che C. M.; Leung W. H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1987, 18, 1376.
	(b) Mack J. B. C.; Gipson J. D.; Bois J.; Sigman M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 9503. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b05469
[15]	Robinson S. G.; Mack J. B. C.; Alektiar S. N.; Bois J.; Sigman M. S. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 7060. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01313 pmid: 32419465
[16]	(a) Huang Z.; Wang C.; Dong G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 5299. doi: 10.1002/anie.v55.17
	(b) Chen F.-J.; Zhao S.; Hu F.; Chen K.; Zhang Q.; Zhang S.-Q.; Shi B.-F. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 4187. doi: 10.1039/c3sc51993g
[17]	Zhou L.; Lu W. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 508. doi: 10.1021/ol403393w
[18]	Yang Q.-L.; Li Y.-Q.; Ma C.; Fang P.; Zhang X.-J.; Mei T.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3293. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01232
[19]	(a) Huang H.; Steiniger K. A.; Lambert T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 12567. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c01914 pmid: 35816101
	(b) Li P.; Zhang T.; Mushtaq M. A.; Wu S.; Xiang X.; Yan D. Chem. Rec. 2021, 21, 841. doi: 10.1002/tcr.v21.4 pmid: 35816101
[20]	Shen T.; Li Y.-L.; Lai L.-C.; Ye K.-Y.; Lambert T. Nature 2023, 614, 275. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05608-x
[21]	(a) Thirumurugan P.; Matosiuk D.; Jozwiak K. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 4905. doi: 10.1021/cr200409f pmid: 23531040
	(b) Meng G.; Guo T.; Ma T.; Zhang J.; Shen Y.; Sharpless K. B.; Dong J. Nature 2019, 574, 86. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1589-1 pmid: 23531040
[22]	Brase S.; Gil C.; Knepper K.; Zimmermann V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5188. doi: 10.1002/anie.v44:33
[23]	(a) Sharma A.; Hartwig J. F. Nature 2015, 517, 600. doi: 10.1038/nature14127
	(b) Xia Y.; Wang L.; Studer A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12940. doi: 10.1002/anie.v57.39
[24]	(a) Huang X.; Bergsten T. M.; Groves J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5300. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b01983
	(b) Suh S.-E.; Chen S.-J.; Mandal M.; Guzei I. A.; Cramer C. J.; Stahl S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 11388. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c05362
[25]	Niu L.; Jiang C.; Liang Y.; Liu D.; Bu F.; Shi R.; Chen H.; Chowdhury D.-A.; Lei A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 17693. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c08437
[26]	Meyer T. H.; Samanta R. C.; Vecchio A. D.; Ackermann L. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 2890. doi: 10.1039/D0SC05924B
[27]	(a) Hou Z.-W.; Liu D.-J.; Xiong P.; Lai X.-L.; Song J.; Xu H.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 2943. doi: 10.1002/anie.v60.6
	(b) Wu J.; Zhou Y.; Zhou Y.; Chiang C.-W.; Lei A. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 8320. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03551
[28]	Zhang L.; Fu Y.; Liu C.; Sun M.; Cheng R.; Zhu W.; Qian X.; Ma Y.; Ye J. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4138. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31813-3 pmid: 35842447
[29]	Crespi S.; Simeth N. A.; König B. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2019, 3, 133. doi: 10.1038/s41570-019-0074-6
[30]	Correia C. A.; Yang L.; Li C.-J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4581. doi: 10.1021/ol201774b
[31]	Hu A.; Guo J.-J.; Pan H.; Zuo Z. Science 2018, 361, 668. doi: 10.1126/science.aat9750
[32]	Xu P.; Chen P.-Y.; Xu H.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 14275. doi: 10.1002/anie.v59.34
[33]	Liu Y.; Shi B.; Liu Z.; Gao R.; Huang C.; Alhumade H.; Wang S.; Qi X.; Lei A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 20863. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c09341
[34]	Capaldo L.; Quadri L. L.; Merli D.; Ravelli D. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 4424. doi: 10.1039/D1CC01012C
[35]	Hagmann W. K. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4359. doi: 10.1021/jm800219f
[36]	West J. G.; Bedell T. A.; Sorensen E. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 8923. doi: 10.1002/anie.v55.31
[37]	Liu W.; Huang X.; Cheng M.-J.; Nielsen R. J.; Goddard W. A.; Groves J. T. Science 2012, 337, 1322. doi: 10.1126/science.1222327
[38]	Takahira Y.; Chen M.; Kawamata Y.; Mykhailiuk P.; Nakamura H.; Peters B. K.; Reisberg S. H.; Li C.; Chen L.; Hoshikawa T.; Shibuguchid T.; Baran P. S. Synlett 2019, 30, 1178. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1611737
[39]	Zou L.; Wang X.; Xiang S.; Zheng W.; Lu Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, e202301026.

电化学促进未活化C(sp³)—H官能团化研究进展

Recent Advances in Electrochemical-Promoted Unactivated C(sp³)—H Functionalization

RichHTML

PDF

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用此文

分享此文

图/表 15

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

相关统计

本文评价

[1]	黄克金, 蔡金博, 王瑞革, 张永红, 王斌, 夏昱, 金伟伟, 李新勇, 刘晨江. 硼促进甘氨酸衍生物的电化学C(sp²)—H溴化反应[J]. 有机化学, 2024, 44(3): 989-996.
[2]	Hasil Aman, 常瑞, 叶俊涛. 氧化型光电催化促进的C—H键官能团化反应研究进展[J]. 有机化学, 2024, 44(3): 728-747.
[3]	高淳, 刘欣, 王明慧, 刘淑贤, 朱婷婷, 张怡康, 郝二军, 杨启亮. 电化学不对称合成反应的研究进展[J]. 有机化学, 2024, 44(3): 673-727.
[4]	张剑, 梁万洁, 杨艺, 闫法超, 刘会. 联烯胺化合物的区域选择性双官能团化[J]. 有机化学, 2024, 44(2): 335-348.
[5]	朱彦硕, 王红言, 舒朋华, 张克娜, 王琪琳. 烷氧自由基引发1,5-氢原子转移实现C(sp³)—H键官能团化的研究进展[J]. 有机化学, 2024, 44(1): 1-17.
[6]	董江湖, 宣良明, 王池, 赵晨熙, 王海峰, 严琼姣, 汪伟, 陈芬儿. 无过渡金属或无光催化剂条件下可见光促进喹喔啉酮C(3)—H官能团化研究进展[J]. 有机化学, 2024, 44(1): 111-136.
[7]	王玉超, 刘晋彪, 何智涛. 钯催化共轭二烯的不对称氢官能团化[J]. 有机化学, 2023, 43(8): 2614-2627.
[8]	刘颖杰, 石岗庆, 仇格, 张鑫, 宋冬雪, 陈宁, 于淼, 许颖. 光/电催化醚α-位官能团化研究进展[J]. 有机化学, 2023, 43(8): 2664-2681.
[9]	钟赟哲, 陈颖, 俞磊, 周宏伟. 电化学介导羧酸与醇的酯化反应[J]. 有机化学, 2023, 43(8): 2855-2863.
[10]	许晓萍, 张翼飞, 莫小渝, 江俊. 铑催化3-重氮吲哚-2-亚胺与吡唑啉酮的C—H官能团化反应制备3-吡唑基吲哚[J]. 有机化学, 2023, 43(7): 2519-2527.
[11]	高师泉, 刘闯军, 杨俊锋, 张俊良. 钴催化的烯烃和炔烃的电化学还原偶联反应[J]. 有机化学, 2023, 43(4): 1559-1565.
[12]	潘彦年, 秦萧, 袁成凯, 鲁艺. 配体在Cp*Rh(III)催化C—H键官能团化反应中的应用[J]. 有机化学, 2023, 43(3): 924-948.
[13]	李落墨, 杨小会. 离子转移反应的研究进展[J]. 有机化学, 2023, 43(3): 1036-1044.
[14]	侯虹宇, 程元元, 陈彬, 佟振合, 吴骊珠. 光催化烯烃α-酰化反应[J]. 有机化学, 2023, 43(3): 1012-1022.
[15]	刘宁, 爨晓丹, 李慧, 段希焱. 烯胺酮α-官能团化反应的研究进展[J]. 有机化学, 2023, 43(2): 602-621.